In Modern Bondage: An International Perspective on Human Trafficking in the 21st CenturyLaura J. Lederer, Senior Advisor on Trafficking in Persons, Office for Democracy and Global AffairsRemarks at the Federal Acquisition Regulation Compliance Training for Government Contractors Washington, DC July 17, 2007 Good afternoon. It is an honor to be here to participate in the FAR Compliance Training for Government Contractors. I want to thank the International Peace Officers Association, and especially Doug Brooks and Iveta Cherneva, for organizing the training, and also, Crowell & Moring, for hosting the event.
I’ve been asked to give you an international perspective on the link between human trafficking and international humanitarian or peacekeeping presence. Trafficking is both a human rights abuse and a transnational law enforcement problem, but it is also a national security threat, a public health issue, a border security concern, and more. Before joining the Department of State I spent years collecting all the foreign national laws that address trafficking in persons. I am asked in every forum for the definition of trafficking in persons. I can tell you that no two laws and no two definitions of human trafficking are the same. Our law in the U.S. defines trafficking as the recruiting, transporting, harboring, providing, or obtaining a person, by force, fraud, or coercion, for the purposes of forced labor or commercial sexual exploitation. But this definition tells us nothing about what happens to a real human being when she is trafficked, so I want to start by telling you about the case that was our “wake up call” in the United States. I do this because this case makes the harm visible. Rosa’s Story Rosa was young and hopeful. She asked her parents if she could go but they forbade her. But she wanted a better life than what she had, and so, against her parents and friend’s warnings, she accepted the offer. She was told to go to the main hotel in town on Friday evening. When she got there, a car was waiting, with several other young girls in it from other neighboring villages. They drove northward hundreds of miles into the desert until the road ended. There, they met up dozens more young women and girls from other towns in Mexico. On the ground were backpacks and water bottles. They were told to put the backpacks on their backs, and then they walked. They walked 4 days and 4 nights–through the desert, across the Rio Grande, and into Brownsville, Texas, where they were picked up by a white van and driven across Texas and Louisiana into rural Florida. They were dropped off in a rural town called Avon Park, in front a series of trailers. A big, burly man met them outside and Rosa said they were told, “I’ve just purchased you. Now you work for me.” They told her she was in a brothel and would have to buy her freedom by sexually servicing men. Rosa was young. She was a virgin. She was Catholic. She knew what the man was telling her was bad, a sin. She began to cry and begged for the restaurant job she was promised. She was told, “There are no restaurant jobs–only this.” When she refused to do what they said, the burly man brought out three other men who took her into one of the trailers and gang-raped her to induct her into the “business.” Then they locked her in the trailer without food and water until she succumbed. For the next 6 months she was a prisoner. She was forced to service ten or more men a day. On the weekends it was as many as 20 to 30 men. The men bought a ticket, which was a condom, for $20.00. But they often didn’t use it. Twice Rosa was impregnated and twice forced to have an abortion. And twice forced back into the brothel the next day. She was beaten if she refused a customer’s demands. She was guarded 24 hours a day, even when she went to the bathroom. She was passed around at private parties that the trafficking ring held in the evenings and on weekends. Once she and several others tried to escape. They were caught and pistol-whipped around the head and face in front of the other girls to deter them all from trying that. Shortly after the second abortion and this beating, Rosa became sick and felt crazy. She was very beautiful and much in demand with the customers. In order to keep her functioning in the brothel, the traffickers gave her drugs and alcohol to numb her pain. She was only “rescued” when one of the young women jumped out of a second story window at one of the private parties and ran to a neighbor’s house. The neighbor called the local police. The police called the INS and FBI, and a sting operation was set up. Over 40 young women and girls were rescued and 14 traffickers were arrested. A medical doctor examined Rosa. She had several STDs; she had broken bones that hadn’t healed properly from the beatings; she had pelvic inflammatory disease and scar tissue from the forced abortions. She was addicted to drugs and alcohol, was suffering from post-traumatic stress syndrome, including nightmares, flashbacks, depression, and suicidal tendencies. In short, she was physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually broken. Scope of the Problem Peacekeeping and Trafficking Humanitarian and peacekeeper/military personnel are entrusted to provide assistance and protection to the local population. There have been too many instances where some of these personnel end up exploiting young women and children as young as 5 years old–offering food, money and promises of education in exchange for sexual favors. This is an abuse of power. Instead of reducing human suffering, they have extended it. The Efforts of the UN and Other Organizations Engaged in Peace Operations The U.S. Government has taken a strong stand against human trafficking within the UN, NATO and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE). For example, in early 2005, then-Secretary of State Colin Powell, and his Japanese counterpart, representing the two largest donor countries to the UN, sent a joint letter to the UN Secretary General expressing concern about continued sexual misconduct by peacekeepers in light of the UN’s zero-tolerance policy. We continue to press the UN for reforms and accountability of personnel. In 2004, we co-led an effort with Norway to get a NATO Policy on Combating Trafficking in Human Beings adopted by member states. In 2005, the OSCE adopted a US-initiated resolution entitled “Ensuring the Highest Standards of Conduct and Accountability of Persons serving on International Forces and Missions. U.S. Prevention Efforts with Military and Civilian Personnel Contractor Role in Fighting Human Trafficking 1. Don’t create demand for victims of sex trafficking and slave labor; 2. Educate foreign counterparts (this applies primarily to police officers and prosecutors); and 3. Establish procedures for reporting possible human trafficking situations and addressing violations. Taking each of these in order, here are a few suggestions: 1. Ways to help curb demand: 2. Educate foreign counterparts (in coordination with foreign governments) about trafficking and how to recognize and treat potential victims. 3. Establish monitoring and reporting procedures that allow employees to report a possible trafficking scenario or violation. Participants need to be aware that the Trafficking Victims Protection Act requires that the U.S. Government shall include a provision that authorizes a Federal department or agency to terminate any grant, contract or cooperative agreement (regardless of whether or not it is related to human trafficking) if the recipients or their sub-recipients 1) engage in severe forms of trafficking in persons or have procured a commercial sex act during the time of the U.S. Government-funded activity, or 2) use forced labor in carrying out U.S. Government-funded activities. The FAR Council and relevant agencies such as the Office of Management and Budget are in the process of establishing uniform government procedures for the inclusion of such a provision. U.S. Government’s Response to Stop Trafficking in Persons The law does a number of things. I only want to mention four briefly because we are going to hear in more detail from the Department of Justice about the use of our new law to prosecute human traffickers. Why is the Trafficking Victims Protection Act so important? First, it broadens the definition of trafficking to include recruiter, transporter, buyer, seller, harborer, brothel owner, manager, and guards. This is important because it gets to the whole pipeline of activity in trafficking. Second it increases penalties from 20 years to life imprisonment. This is important because it sends a message to traffickers that we take human trafficking as seriously as drug trafficking–and that the penalties will be commensurate with the crime. Third, it has a victim-centered approach, including a “T visa” for victims of severe forms of trafficking–which allows the victim to stay in the U.S. temporarily for up to 4 years and apply for permanent residency status, and allows access to benefits, including food, clothing, and shelter, medical, legal, and other forms of assistance, and finally, education and employment assistance. Fourth, the law also mandated the creation of a President's Interagency Task Force on Trafficking in Persons. This cabinet level task force is chaired by the Secretary of State, and includes the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Director of National Intelligence, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Secretary of Labor, the Secretary of Defense, the U.S. Agency for International Development Administrator, and other officials as designated by the President. This Cabinet-level Task Force is important because it creates political will at the highest levels, which streams down into each agency. Implementation of the Law In the last 5 years, since the law passed, the U.S. Government, through all its agencies, has worked hard to implement the law, for example: Trafficking as a Transnational Crime Taking advantage of the chaos, poverty, and vulnerability of people, traffickers have set up and solidified sophisticated regional and global trafficking networks that include recruiters, transporters, harborers, buyers, sellers, and others. These networks operate across national, ethnic, language, and geographic barriers. With estimates in the millions of people being moved across borders, the transnational crime of trafficking has created significant challenges for countries of origin, transit, and destination. Those working to help victims see on a daily basis the lives shattered by the terrible exploitation of innocent people. Countless men, women, and children are subjected to abuse we cannot begin to imagine. People seeking better lives are tricked, forced, and coerced into slavery and slavery-like situations. The stories of young women and children trafficked into sexual slavery are especially horrifying. Because trafficking is a transnational problem, it requires a transnational solution. Organized crime doesn’t stop at the borders–neither can our law enforcement efforts. We need to find answers to an especially thorny set of questions: The United States has developed a framework of three P’s: prevention, prosecution, and protection (and assistance) to help combat trafficking in persons. For prosecution, we have made reducing corruption and enhancing transparency a top foreign policy priority because we believe both are central to stable democracies, sustainable development, and national security. We have also passed new legislation making document fraud intended to further trafficking in persons a crime. We are also working with countries to encourage them to draft and pass their own laws prohibiting trafficking in persons, corruption, money laundering, document tampering, and other related crimes. We do this because we believe that a counter-crime approach that connects trafficking to corruption, border patrol, document forgery, money-laundering, terrorism, and other transnational criminal activities is essential. For protection, we encourage victim-centered programs that include rescue of victims, witness protection, shelters, and a comprehensive set of services for trafficking victims, as well as repatriation, resettlement, and reintegration programs where necessary. The victim-centered approach to trafficking does not prosecute the victims of sex trafficking for prostitution, for example. Rather it offers them a place of safety while addressing their physical, psychological and vocational needs. These assistance programs are basic humanitarian responses to a global problem. But perhaps most important of the three Ps are the prevention programs. Prevention is primary. Why? Because once a human being has been trafficked, the devastation is so great that rehabilitation is a lengthy effort with highly uncertain prospects for success. While we have victims we will support assistance programs, but in almost every country we are encouraging education and awareness campaigns to reach vulnerable communities and individuals. We are also interested in addressing issues of property and inheritance rights for women and suggesting legal as well as social reforms to combat practices and attitudes that discriminate against women and girls. These prevention programs are critical. After all, which would you rather have: a hospital at the bottom of the cliff or a fence at the top? Prevention programs are the fence at the top. While we have come a long way, we still have much to do. Winston Churchill once said “Give us the Tools and we will finish the Job.” This training, which I hope will be the first of many that contractors undertake, will give your people the information–the tools–they need to conduct themselves properly in the field, as well as to help combat trafficking in persons. The United States Government looks forward to working with you to insure excellence in peacekeeping operations, including abolishing human trafficking and related transnational criminal activities. If we share a common goal and a common determination, together we can finish the job. |