| |
| | | | | | | | |
- No. 03-1389: Judicial Watch v. IRS - Opposition
- No. 03-1410: Bank United v. United States - Opposition
- No. 03-1414: Hamilton v. Collett - Opposition
- No. 03-1418: Harris v. FAA - Opposition
- No. 03-1433: Rann v. Choa - Opposition
- No. 03-1450: Kahn v. Ashcroft - Opposition
- No. 03-1457: Metropolitan Stevedore v. Crescent Wharf - Opposition
- No. 03-1482: Assa'Ad-Faltas v. Ashcroft - Opposition
- No. 03-1485: McCloy v. DOA - Opposition
- No. 03-1519: Bramwell v. Bureau of Prisons - Opposition
- No. 03-1521: Visa U.S.A., Inc. v. United States - Opposition
- No. 03-1540: LaFontaine v. United States - Opposition
- No. 03-1551: Biehl v. CIR - Opposition
- No. 03-1552: Mainstream v. FTC - Opposition
- No. 03-1562: HCA v. Commissioner - Opposition
- No. 03-1566: Orff v. United States - Opposition
- No. 03-1602: Artichoke Joe's v. Norton - Opposition
- No. 03-1609: Providence v. Thompson - Opposition
- No. 03-1610: Whitaker v. Thompson - Opposition
- No. 03-1619: GDF v. Norton, Secretary of the Interior - Opposition
- No. 03-1635: Shaeffer v. United States - Opposition
- No. 03-1640: Nebraska v. EPA - Opposition
- No. 03-1655:Lewis v. United States - Opposition
- No. 03-1668: Mitrione v. United States - Opposition
- No. 03-1691: Robert W. Lee, Sr. v. United States - Opposition
- No. 03-1709: Union Elec. v. United States - Opposition
- No. 03-1722: Verizon v. RIAA - Opposition
- No. 04-12: National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners v. USTA - Opposition
- No. 04-33: Flynt v. Rumsfeld - Opposition
- No. 04-38: Miller v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-39: Gollie v. Elkay Mining Co. - Opposition
- No. 04-40: Invention Submission Corp. v. Dudas - Opposition
- No. 04-75: Stern v. United States - Response (hold)
- No. 04-83: Tucker v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-87: Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-107: Cibao Meat Products v. NLRB - Opposition
- No. 04-113: Teyent Loulou v. Ashcroft - Opposition
- No. 04-121: Crawford v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-137: Triplett v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-145: Micklin v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-150: Charleston County v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-154: Media General v. NLRB - Opposition
- No. 04-173: Quinn v. SEC - Opposition
- No. 04-183: Iacaboni v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-190: Petro-Hunt v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-193: Hammoud v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-198: Fitzgerald v. CFTC - Opposition
- No. 04-206: SL Service, Inc. v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-208: Jiles v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-232: Tenenbaum v. Simonini - Opposition
- No. 04-244: Dupurton v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-245: Rosalinda Alt v. Commissioner - Opposition
- No.04-251: Demissie and Negussu v. Ashcroft - Opposition
- No. 04-256: Asika v. Ashcroft - Opposition
- No. 04-264: Courtney v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-274: Flarida v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-280: Kebede v. Gonzales - Opposition
- No. 04-283: Lubetzky v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-0294: Fountain v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-306: Venture Coal Sales v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-314: Flarida v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-322: Francis v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-331: Orandello v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-332: LeBrun v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-335: DiFrisco v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-337: Callipari v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-339: Evangelista v. Ashcroft - Opposition
- No. 04-350: Fluro Daniel, Inc. v. NLRB - Opposition
- No. 04-356: Egervary v. Young - Opposition
- No. 04-358: McCormick v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-367: DeWaal v. Alston - Opposition
- No. 04-368: Arthur Anderson LLP v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-385: Stern v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-397: Former Employees of Marathon Ashland Pipe Line, LLC v. Chao - Opposition
- No. 04-414:Roach v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-430: Lifestar Ambulance v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-438: American Fed'n of Gov't Employees v. FLRA - Opposition
- No. 04-439: Johnson v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-457: Long v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-460: National League of Cities v. FCC - Opposition
- No. 04-464: City of New York v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-467:Pearson Education, Inc. v. NLRB - Opposition
- No. 04-469: Surfside v. Sephardi - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-484:National Taxpayers Union v. SSA - Opposition
- No. 04-503: Wint v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-517:Christopher Village, L.P. v. United States -
- No. 04-529: Superior Protection, Inc. v. NLRB - Opposition
- No. 04-0530: Nagy v. Butner - Opposition
- No. 04-548: Tate v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-585: Klinger v. Director, Department of Revenue - Opposition
- No. 04-589: The Brink's Co. v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-602:Namer v. FTC - Opposition
- No. 04-620:Jifry v. FAA - Opposition
- No. 04-626: Glendale Federal Bank v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-652: Calhoun v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-658: McInerney v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-670: Aleru v. Gonzales - Opposition
- No. 04-670: Aleru v. Gonzales - Supplemental Response
- No. 04-682: Patel v. Gonzales - Opposition
- No. 04-692: Chaney v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-693: Franklin Savings Corporation v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-694:Chomic v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-702: Hamdan v. Rumsfeld - Opposition
- No. 04-711:Koonin v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-714:Triple A Fire v. NLRB - Opposition
- No. 04-723: Stevedoring v. Price - Opposition
- No. 04-731: E. Shoshone Indian Tribe v. United States - Response (Acquiescence)
- No. 04-741: Culbertson v. Barnhart - Opposition
- No. 04-742: Doe v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-748: WMATA v. Barbour - Opposition
- No. 04-762: Badilla v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-766: Lamers Dairy v. Department of Agriculture - Opposition
- No. 04-768: Cervini v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-775: Blaine County v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-800: Schneider v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-809:Norfolk Dredging Co. v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-820: Acree v. Iraq and United States - Opposition
- No. 04-822: Ammex v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-835: AG Route Seven P'ship v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-837:Tarver v. Bo-Mac Contractors - Opposition
- No. 04-848: Dolan v. USPS - Opposition
- No. 04-852: Ashlock v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-858: Grasso v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-860: Ammex, Inc. v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-881:Lockhart v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-894: Czichray v. United States - Opposition
- Nos. 04-900 & 04-903: BP West Coast Products v. FERC - Opposition
- No. 04-922: National Wrestling Coaches Ass'n v. Department of Education - Opposition
- No. 04-923:Mobil Oil v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-948: Patel v. Gonzales - Opposition
- No. 04-949: McMellon v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-969: Saunders v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-975: Lewis v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-978: D.A.S. Sand & Gravel v. Chao - Opposition
- No. 04-1020: Media Genearl v. FCC - Opposition
- No. 04-1034: Rapanos, et al. v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1038: Singh v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1041: Kahawaiolaa v. Norton - Opposition
- No. 04-1073: Bashir v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-1086:Robinson v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-1094: Numez v. United States - Respones (Hold)
- No. 04-1094: Numez v. United States - Supplemental Opposition
- No. 04-1106: Folden v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1115: Seattle Housing v. Potter - Opposition
- No. 04-1116:Wagner - United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-1131: Whitman v. DOT - Opposition
- No. 04-1148: Rodriguez v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1149: Rose Acre Farms v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1164: Saladino v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-1210: Hembree v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1225: Adams v. United States - Opposition
- No.04-1227: Bradley v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-1252: American Pelagic v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1263: Boyd v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-1276: Dotson v. Griesa - Opposition
- No. 04-1291: El-Shifa Pharm. v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1292:Pemco v. EEOC - Opposition
- No. 04-1300:Macias-Placencia v. Gonzales - Opposition
- No. 04-1316: Moncrief v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-1325: McElwee v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-1331: Fletcher v. United States - Respones (Hold)
- No. 04-1342:Padilla v. Hanft - Opposition
- No. 04-1345: Arnold v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-1361: Fullenkamp v. Secretary of Agriculture -
- No. 04-1362: Hale v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-1383: Schiff v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1384: Carabell v. Army Corps of Engineers - Opposition
- No. 04-1387: Tugman v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1396: Sorrentino v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1423: Alternate Power Source v. FERC - Opposition
- No. 04-1434:Burt v. Rumsfeld - Opposition
- No. 04-1438: Drury v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1462: Franklin Savings v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1468: Boulware v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1481: O'Rouke v. Smithsonian - Opposition
- No. 04-1492: Lahey v. United States
- No. 04-1502: Horn Farms, Inc. v. Johans - Opposition
- No. 04-1507: Miller v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1508: Cooper and Time, Inc. v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1532: Rice v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-1610: Saenz v. United States - Response (Hold)
- No. 04-1620: Mills v. United States - Opposition
- No. 04-1698: Husband v. United States - Response (Hold)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|