The data collected for this study reveals that the appropriate design user for shared use paths may vary with respect to design criteria or a facility design element. Table 23 shows design features, AASHTO design values for bicyclists, potential design users, and 85th percentile performance values.
Table 23. Design criteria and potential design users.
DESIGN FEATURE | AASHTO DESIGN VALUE (FOR BICYCLISTS) | POTENTIAL DESIGN USER | PERFORMANCE VALUE (85TH PERCENTILE) |
---|---|---|---|
Sweep width | 1.2 m | Inline skaters | 1.5 m |
Horizontal alignment | 27 m | Recumbent bicyclists | 26.8 m |
Stopping sight distance (wet pavement) | 38.7 m | Recumbent bicyclists | 32.7 m |
Vertical alignment-crest | 49.8 m | Recumbent bicyclists | 46.7 m |
Refuge islands | 2.5 m | Bicyclists with trailers | 3.0 m |
Signal clearance intervals | 7.5 sec for a distance of 24.4 m | Kick scooters | 10.6 sec for a distance of 24.4 m |
Minimum green times | 12.8 sec for a distance of 24.4 m | Hand cyclists | 17.9 sec for a distance of 24.4 m |
Pedestrian clearance intervals | 20.0 sec for a distance of 24.4 m | Manual wheelchairs | 15.4 sec for a distance of 24.4 m |
1 m = 3.28 ft
It is worth noting that bicyclists (without trailers) do not appear as critical users for any of the design criteria. This is a major finding that may have a significant effect on how shared use paths and other components of the U.S. transportation system are designed, constructed, controlled, and maintained.
The data collected during this project suggest that several actions should be considered:
Previous | Table of Contents | Next
FHWA-HRT-04-103
HRDS-06/10-04(1M)E
TFHRC Home |
FHWA Home | Feedback |