1 The Complainant filed safety complaints against Sargent & Lundy while working for Commonwealth Edison at their LaSalle Nuclear Station. Sargent & Lundy was a contractor to Commonwealth Edison at that time.
2Hasan v. Sargent & Lundy, 2000-ERA-7 (ALJ Oct. 5, 2000).
16See, e.g., Complainant's Response (Second) Brief, at 42 (Aug. 26, 2002). However, during cross examination, the Complainant acknowledged that he would take nothing less than an engineering position.
17 This information was disclosed during the testimony of Mr. James Kelnosky, who was the technical staff manager in-charge of the contract resources group. The testimony was presented before Judge Mills, during the Complainant's previous case against the Respondent. The case was styled Hasan v. Sargent & Lundy, 1996-ERA-27 (ALJ Aug. 6, 1996). A portion of the hearing transcript was submitted as an exhibit by the Complainant, and is identified as CX 10.
18Floyd v. Arizona Public Service Co., 1990-ERA-39, 5 (Sec'y Sept. 23, 1994).
19 Complainant's Response to Show Cause Order, Attachment 1, at 1.
20 In its post-hearing brief, the Respondent notes, "S&L concedes that whatever it was that Hasan claims to be protected, S&L knew about it."
21 Complainant's Reply (Third) Brief, at 14 (Sep. 9, 2002).
22Couty v. Dole, 886 F.2d 147, 148 (8th Cir. 1989).
23 Complainant's Reply (Third) Brief, at 24 (Sept. 9, 2002).