skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Photos representing the workforce - Digital Imagery© copyright 2001 PhotoDisc, Inc.
www.dol.gov

Previous Section

Content Last Revised:
---DISCLAIMER---

Next Section

CFR  

Code of Federal Regulations Pertaining to ESA

Title 29  

Labor

 

Chapter V  

Wage and Hour Division, Department of Labor

 

 

Part 780  

Exemptions Applicable to Agriculture, Processing of Agricultural Commodities, and Related Subjects Under the Fair Labor Standards Act

 

 

 

Subpart J  

Employment in Fruit and Vegetable Harvest Transportation; Exemption From Overtime Pay Requirements Under Section 13(b)(16)


29 CFR 780.902 - Legislative history of exemption.

  • Section Number: 780.902
  • Section Name: Legislative history of exemption.

    Since the language of section 13(b)(16) and its predecessor, section 
13(a)(22) is identical, the legislative history of former section 
13(a)(22) still retains its pertinency and vitality. The former section 
13(a)(22) was added to the Act by the Fair Labor Standards Amendments of 
1961. The original provision in the House-passed bill was in the form of 
an amendment to the Act's definition of agriculture. It would have 
altered the effect of holdings of the courts that operations such as 
those described in the amendment are not within the agriculture 
exemption provided by section 13(a)(6) when performed by employees of 
persons other than the farmer. (Chapman v. Durkin, 214 F. 2d 360, 
certiorari denied 348 U.S. 897; Fort Mason Fruit Co. v. Durkin, 214 F. 
2d 363, certiorari denied, 348 U.S. 897.) The amendment was offered to 
exempt operations which, in the sponsor's view, were meant to be exempt 
under the original Act. (See 107 Cong. Rec. (daily ed.) p. 4523.) The 
Conference Committee, in changing the provision to make it a separate 
exemption made it clear that is was ``not intended by the committee of 
conference to change by this exemption (for the described transportation 
employees) * * * the application of the Act to any other employees. Nor 
is it intended that there be any implication of disagreement by the 
conference committee with the principles and tests governing the 
application of the present agricultural exemption as enunciated by the 
courts.'' (H. Rept. No. 327, 87th Cong., first session, p. 18.)
Previous Section

Next Section



Phone Numbers