| Patents > Search Colections > MPEP > § 66.2 Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority - none Patent Cooperation Treaty |
|
|
|
Go to MPEP - Table of Contents
§ 66.2 Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority - none Patent Cooperation Treaty
§ 66.2 Written Opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority
(a) If the International Preliminary Examining Authority
(i) considers that any of the situations referred to in Article 34(4) exists,
(ii) considers that the international preliminary examination report should be negative in respect of any of the claims because the invention claimed therein does not appear to be novel, does not appear to involve an inventive step (does not appear to be non-obvious), or does not appear to be industrially applicable,
(iii) notices that there is some defect in the form or contents of the international application under the Treaty or these Regulations,
(iv) considers that any amendment goes beyond the disclosure in the international application as filed,
(v) wishes to accompany the international preliminary examination report by observations on the clarity of the claims, the description, and the drawings, or the question whether the claims are fully supported by the description,
(vi) considers that a claim relates to an invention in respect of which no international search report has been established and has decided not to carry out the international preliminary examination in respect of that claim, or
(vii) considers that a nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence listing is not available to it in such a form that a meaningful international preliminary examination can be carried out, the said Authority shall notify the applicant accordingly in writing. Where the national law of the national Office acting as International Preliminary Examining Authority does not allow multiple dependent claims to be drafted in a manner different from that provided for in the second and third sentences of Rule 6.4(a), the International Preliminary Examining Authority may, in case of failure to use that manner of claiming, apply Article 34(4)(b). In such case, it shall notify the applicant accordingly in writing.
(b) The notification shall fully state the reasons for the opinion of the International Preliminary Examining Authority.
(c) The notification shall invite the applicant to submit a written reply together, where appropriate, with amendments.
(d) The notification shall fix a time limit for the reply. The time limit shall be reasonable under the circumstances. It shall normally be two months after the date of notification. In no case shall it be shorter than one month after the said date. It shall be at least two months after the said date where the international search report is transmitted at the same time as the notification. It shall, subject to paragraph (e), not be more than three months after the said date.
(e) The time limit for replying to the notification may be extended if the applicant so requests before its expiration.
The Inventors Assistance Center is available to help you on patent matters.Send questions about USPTO programs and services to the USPTO Contact Center (UCC). You can suggest USPTO webpages or material you would like featured on this section by E-mail to the webmaster@uspto.gov. While we cannot promise to accommodate all requests, your suggestions will be considered and may lead to other improvements on the website. |
|
|
Go to MPEP - Table of Contents
=online
business system 
=fees 
=forms
=help 
=laws/regulations 
=definition
(glossary)