Exhibit 300 FY2009

I. A. 1. Date of Submission:
2007-04-18

I. A. 2. Agency:
018

I. A. 3. Bureau:
14

I. A. 4. Name of this Capital Asset:
(short text - 250 characters)
Integrated Support Service (ISS)

I. A. 5. Unique Project (Investment) Identifier:
For IT investment only, see section 53. For all other, use agency ID system.
018-14-01-01-01-1040-00

I. A. 6. What kind of investment will this be in FY2009?
Please NOTE: Investments moving to O&M in FY2009, with Planning/Acquisition activities prior to FY2009 should not select O&M. These investments should indicate their current status.
Operations and Maintenance

I. A. 7. What was the first budget year this investment was submitted to OMB?
FY2001 or earlier

I. A. 8. Provide a brief summary and justification for this investment, including a brief description of how this, closes in part or in whole, an identified agency performance gap:
(long text - 2500 characters)
Integrated Support Services (ISS) was undertaken to integrate disparate systems into a single integrated financial management solution for the Department- EDCAPS. Before EDCAPS there were separate systems for grants, contracts, purchase orders, travel, and accounting. These systems didn't communicate with each other and required many manual processes and duplicate data entry. This resulted in inefficiencies, out of balance systems, and generally poor financial management capability. EDCAPS, in a first for government agencies, was able to tie these systems together resulting in: Decreased data entry requirement; More efficient business processes; Reduced paper processes; Reduced number of "cuff systems"; Improved financial system reporting capabilities; More accurate information; Increased system availability; Improved system performance; Improved financial management controls; and Faster processing of payment requests. ISS is not a system but a bundle of services that support all the EDCAPS systems (CPSS, GAPS, FMSS, TMS). EDCAPS support is primarily provided under a single fixed price contract. ISS was created to fund those parts of the contract that benefit all EDCAPS systems but were not directly attributable to them. This includes contractor project management and administration, database administration, system architecture planning and support, configuration management support, application and integration testing, and training support. In addition, ISS contains funding for hardware, hardware support (break/fix), software, and software support (updates and bug fixes), that are part of the overall EDCAPS infrastructure and critical to maintaining a reliable system.

I. A. 9. Did the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee approve this request?
yes

I. A. 10. Did the Project Manager review this Exhibit?
yes

I. A. 11. Contact information of Project Manager

I. A. 12. Has the agency developed and/or promoted cost effective, energy-efficient and environmentally sustainable techniques or practices for this project?
no

I. A. 13. Does this investment directly support one of the PMA initiatives?
yes

I. A. 14. Does this investment support a program assessed using the Program Assessment Rating Tool (PART)? (For more information about the PART, visit www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part.)
no

I. A. 15. Is this investment for information technology?
yes

I. A. 16. What is the level of the IT Project? (per CIO Council PM Guidance)
Level 1 - Projects with low-to-moderate complexity and risk. Example: Bureau-level project such as a stand-alone information system that has low- to-moderate complexity and risk.
Level 2 - Projects with high complexity and/or risk which are critical to the mission of the organization. Examples: Projects that are part of a portfolio of projects/systems that impact each other and/or impact mission activities. Department-wide projects that impact cross-organizational missions, such as an agency-wide system integration that includes large scale Enterprise Resource Planning (e.g., the DoD Business Mgmt Modernization Program).
Level 3 - Projects that have high complexity, and/or risk, and have government-wide impact. Examples: Government-wide initiative (E-GOV, President's Management Agenda). High interest projects with Congress, GAO, OMB, or the general public. Cross-cutting initiative (Homeland Security).
Level 2

I. A. 17. What project management qualifications does the Project Manager have? (per CIO Council's PM Guidance):
(1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment;(2) Project manager qualification is under review for this investment;(3) Project manager assigned to investment, but does not meet requirements;(4) Project manager assigned but qualification status review has not yet started;(5) No Project manager has yet been assigned to this investment
(1) Project manager has been validated as qualified for this investment

I. A. 18. Is this investment identified as "high risk" on the Q4-FY 2007 agency high risk report (per OMB Memorandum M-05-23)?
no

I. A. 19. Is this a financial management system?
no

I. A. 20. What is the percentage breakout for the total FY2009 funding request for the following? (This should total 100%)

I. A. 21. If this project produces information dissemination products for the public, are these products published to the Internet in conformance with OMB Memorandum 05-04 and included in your agency inventory, schedules and priorities?
n/a

I. A. 22. Contact information of individual responsible for privacy related questions:

I. A. 23. Are the records produced by this investment appropriately scheduled with the National Archives and Records Administration's approval?
yes

I. A. 24. Does this investment directly support one of the GAO High Risk Areas?
Question 24 must be answered by all Investments:
no

I. B. 1. Provide the total estimated life-cycle cost for this investment by completing the following table. All amounts represent budget authority in millions, and are rounded to three decimal places. Federal personnel costs should be included only in the row designated "Government FTE Cost," and should be excluded from the amounts shown for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." The "TOTAL" estimated annual cost of the investment is the sum of costs for "Planning," "Full Acquisition," and "Operation/Maintenance." For Federal buildings and facilities, life-cycle costs should include long term energy, environmental, decommissioning, and/or restoration costs. The costs associated with the entire life-cycle of the investment should be included in this report.
Note: For the cross-agency investments, this table should include all funding (both managing and partner agencies).
Government FTE Costs should not be included as part of the TOTAL represented.

PY-1 and Spending Prior to 2007 PY 2007 CY 2008 BY 2009 BY+1 2010 BY+2 2011 BY+3 2012 BY+4 2013 and Beyond Planning 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000         Acquisition 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000         Subtotal Planning & Acquisition                 Operations & Maintenance 55.990 7.738 7.999 8.811         Total                 Government FTE Costs 12.721 1.721 1.803 1.890         Number of FTE represented by cost 45 15 15 15

I. B. 2. Will this project require the agency to hire additional FTE's?
no

I. B. 3. If the summary of spending has changed from the FY2008 President's budget request, briefly explain those changes.
(long text - 2500 characters)
FY08 increases are due to additional software licensing fees, hardware maintenance, and increases in labor rates, necessary to maintain and operate the EDCAPS systems. Because of the new EDCAPS architecture, additional software licenses are required. In FY09 our greatest increases result from the maintenance agreements for the EDCAPS hardware and EDCAPS operating system coming due. Both were covered for four years after the initial purchase in FY05. In addition, our EDCAPS support contract will expire and we are requesting funding to cover a transition period of three months to ensure knowledge transfer between the existing contractor and a new one.

I. C. 1. Complete the table for all (including all non-Federal) contracts and/or task orders currently in place or planned for this investment. Total Value should include all option years for each contract. Contracts and/or task orders completed do not need to be included.
SIS - Share in Services contract; ESPC - Energy savings performance contract ; UESC - Utility energy efficiency service contract; EUL - Enhanced use lease contract; N/A - no alternative financing used.
(Character Limitations: Contract or Task Order Number - 250 Characters; Type of Contract/Task Order - 250 Characters; Name of CO - 250 Characters; CO Contact Information - 250 Characters)

Type of Contract/Task Order Has the contract been awarded? If so what is the date of the award? If not, what is the planned award date? Start date of Contract/Task Order End date of Contract/Task Order Total Value of Contract/Task Order ($M) Is this an Interagency Acquisition? Is it performance based? Competitively awarded? What, if any, alternative financing option is being used? Is EVM in the contract? Does the contract include the required security & privacy clauses? Name of CO CO Contact Information (phone/email) Contracting officer certification level If N/A, has the agency determined the CO assigned has the competencies and skills necessary to support this aquistion?

I. C. 2. If earned value is not required or will not be a contract requirement for any of the contracts or task orders above, explain why:
(long text - 2500 characters)

I. C. 3. Do the contracts ensure Section 508 compliance?

I. C. 4. Is there an acquisition plan which has been approved in accordance with agency requirements?

I. D. 1. Table 1. Performance Information Table
In order to successfully address this area of the exhibit 300, performance goals must be provided for the agency and be linked to the annual performance plan. The investment must discuss the agency's mission and strategic goals, and performance measures (indicators) must be provided. These goals need to map to the gap in the agency's strategic goals and objectives this investment is designed to fill. They are the internal and external performance benefits this investment is expected to deliver to the agency (e.g., improve efficiency by 60 percent, increase citizen participation by 300 percent a year to achieve an overall citizen participation rate of 75 percent by FY 2xxx, etc.). The goals must be clearly measurable investment outcomes, and if applicable, investment outputs. They do not include the completion date of the module, milestones, or investment, or general goals, such as, significant, better, improved that do not have a quantitative measure.

Agencies must use the following table to report performance goals and measures for the major investment and use the Federal Enterprise Architecture (FEA) Performance Reference Model (PRM). Map all Measurement Indicators to the corresponding "Measurement Area" and "Measurement Grouping" identified in the PRM. There should be at least one Measurement Indicator for each of the four different Measurement Areas (for each fiscal year). The PRM is available at www.egov.gov. The table can be extended to include performance measures for years beyond FY 2009.

Strategic Goal(s) Supported Measurement Area Measurement Grouping Measurement Indicator Baseline Target Actual Results 2004 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Mission and Business Results Higher Education Percentage of grant applications submitted electronically (for programs participating) 23% Increase to 25% 37% 2004 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Customer Results Customer Satisfaction Customer service survey results Score of 3 out of 5 Increase to 4 out of 5 4 2004 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Processes and Activities Financial Management Clean audit opinion Financial Maintain clean opinion Clean opinion received 2004 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Technology Availability Percentage of time EDCAPS platform is available to customers during regular operating hours 98% Increase to 99% 99% 2005 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Mission and Business Results Higher Education Percentage of grant applications submitted electronically (for programs participating) 37% Increase to 40% 73% 2005 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Customer Results Customer Satisfaction Monthly customer service survey results Score of 4 out of 5 Increase to 5 out of 5 4.1 2005 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Processes and Activities Financial Management Clean audit opinion Clean Maintain clean opinion Clean 2005 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Technology Availability Percentage of time EDCAPS platform is available to customers during regular operating hours 99% Increase to 99.5% 99% 2006 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Mission and Business Results Higher Education Percentage of grant applications submitted electronically (for programs participating) 73% Increase to 80% 74% 2006 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Customer Results Customer Satisfaction Monthly customer service survey results 4.1 out of 5 Increase to 4. 5 out of 5 4 2006 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Processes and Activities Financial Management Clean audit opinion Clean audit Maintain clean audit Clean Opinion Received 2006 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Technology Availability Percentage of time EDCAPS platform is available to customers during regular operating hours 99% Increase to 99.5% 99% 2007 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Mission and Business Results Higher Education Percentage of grant applications submitted electronically (for programs participating) 74% Increase to 80% 78% 2007 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Customer Results Customer Satisfaction Monthly customer service survey results Score of 4 out of 5 Increase to 4. 5 out of 5 4.2 2007 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Processes and Activities Financial Management Clean audit opinion Clean audit Maintain Clean audit Results available 12/2007 2007 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Technology Availability Percentage of time EDCAPS platform is available to customers during regular operating hours 99% Increase to 99.5% 99.1% 2008 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Mission and Business Results Higher Education Percentage of grant applications submitted electronically (for programs participating) 78% Increase to 80% Results available 8/2008 2008 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Customer Results Customer Satisfaction Monthly customer service survey results Score 4.2 out of 5 Increase to 4.5 out of 5 Results available 11/2007 2008 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Processes and Activities Financial Management Clean audit opinion TBD 12/2007 Maintain clean audit Results available 12/2008 2008 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Technology Availability Percentage of time EDCAPS platform is available to customers during regular operating hours 99.1% increase to 99.5% Results available 8/2008 2009 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Mission and Business Results Higher Education Percentage of grant applications submitted electronically (for programs participating) TBD 8/2008 Increase to 85% Results available 8/2009 2009 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Customer Results Customer Satisfaction Monthly customer service survey results TBD 11/2007 Increase to 4.5 out of 5 Results available 11/2008 2009 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Processes and Activities Financial Management Clean audit opinion TBD 12/2008 Maintain clean opinion Results available 12/2009 2009 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Technology Availability Percentage of time EDCAPS platform is available to customers during regular operating hours TBD 8/2008 Increase to 99.5% Results available 8/2009 2010 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Mission and Business Results Higher Education Percentage of grant applications submitted electronically (for programs participating) TBD 8/2009 Increase to 90% Results available 8/2010 2010 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Customer Results Customer Satisfaction Monthly customer service survey results TBD 11/2008 Increase to 4.5 out of 5 Results available 11/2009 2010 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Processes and Activities Financial Management Clean audit opinion TBD 12/2009 Maintain clean opinion Results available 12/2010 2010 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Technology Availability Percentage of time EDCAPS platform is available to customers during regular operating hours TBD 8/2009 Increase to 99.5% Results available 8/2010 2011 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Mission and Business Results Higher Education Percentage of grant applications submitted electronically (for programs participating) TBD 8/2010 Increase to 95% Results available 8/2011 2011 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Customer Results Customer Satisfaction Monthly customer service survey TBD 11/2009 Increase to 4.5 out of 5 Results available 11/2010 2011 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Processes and Activities Financial Management Clean audit opinion TBD 12/2010 Maintain clean opinion Results available 12/2011 2011 Cross-goal Strategy on Management Technology Availability Percentage of time EDCAPS platform is available to customers during regular operating hours TBD 8/2010 Increase to 99.5% Results available 8/2011

I. E. 1. Have the IT security costs for the system(s) been identified and integrated into the overall costs of the investment?

I. E. 2. Is identifying and assessing security and privacy risks a part of the overall risk management effort for each system supporting or part of this investment?

I. E. 3. Systems in Planning and Undergoing Enhancement(s) – Security Table:
The questions asking whether there is a PIA which covers the system and whether a SORN is required for the system are discrete from the narrative fields. The narrative column provides an opportunity for free text explanation why a working link is not provided. For example, a SORN may be required for the system, but the system is not yet operational. In this circumstance, answer "yes" for column (e) and in the narrative in column (f), explain that because the system is not operational the SORN is not yet required to be published.

Agency/or Contractor Operated System Planned Operational Date Date of Planned C & A update (for existing mixed life cycle systems) or Planned Completion Date (for new systems)

I. E. 4. Operational Systems - Security:

Agency/or contractor Operated System? NIST FIPS 199 Risk Impact level (High, Moderate, Low) Has C & A been Completed, using NIST 800-37? (Y/N) Date Completed: C & A What standards were used for the Security Controls tests? (FIPS 200/NIST 800-53, Other, N/A) Date Completed: Security Control Testing Date the contingency plan tested

I. E. 5. Have any weaknesses related to any of the systems part of or supporting this investment been identified by the agency or IG?

I. E. 6. Indicate whether an increase in IT security funding is requested to remediate IT security weaknesses?

I. E. 7. How are contractor security procedures monitored, verified, and validated by the agency for the contractor systems above?
(long text - 2500 characters)

I. E. 8. Planning & Operational Systems - Privacy Table:
Details for Text Options:
Column (d): If yes to (c), provide the link(s) to the publicly posted PIA(s) with which this system is associated. If no to (c), provide an explanation why the PIA has not been publicly posted or why the PIA has not been conducted.

Column (f): If yes to (e), provide the link(s) to where the current and up to date SORN(s) is published in the federal register. If no to (e), provide an explanation why the SORN has not been published or why there isn't a current and up to date SORN.

Note: Links must be provided to specific documents not general privacy websites.

(b) Is this a new system? (Y/N) (c) Is there a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) that covers this system? (Y/N) (d) Internet Link or Explanation (e) Is a System of Records Notice (SORN) required for this system? (Y/N) (f) Internet Link or Explanation

I. F. 1. Is this investment included in your agency's target enterprise architecture?
yes

I. F. 2. Is this investment included in the agency's EA Transition Strategy?
yes

I. F. 3. Is this investment identified in a completed (contains a target architecture) and approved segment architecture?
no

I. F. 4. Service Component Reference Model (SRM) Table :
Identify the service components funded by this major IT investment (e.g., knowledge management, content management, customer relationship management, etc.). Provide this information in the format of the following table. For detailed guidance regarding components, please refer to http://www.egov.gov.

a. Use existing SRM Components or identify as "NEW". A "NEW" component is one not already identified as a service component in the FEA SRM.
b. A reused component is one being funded by another investment, but being used by this investment. Rather than answer yes or no, identify the reused service component funded by the other investment and identify the other investment using the Unique Project Identifier (UPI) code from the OMB Ex 300 or Ex 53 submission.
c. 'Internal' reuse is within an agency. For example, one agency within a department is reusing a service component provided by another agency within the same department. 'External' reuse is one agency within a department reusing a service component provided by another agency in another department. A good example of this is an E-Gov initiative service being reused by multiple organizations across the federal government.
d. Please provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount used for each service component listed in the table. If external, provide the percentage of the BY requested funding amount transferred to another agency to pay for the service. The percentages in this column can, but are not required to, add up to 100%.

Agency Component Description FEA SRM Service Type FEA SRM Component (a) Service Component Reused - Component Name (b) Service Component Reused - UPI (b) Internal or External Reuse? (c) BY Funding Percentage (d) Configuration Management Manages a CM process that works across the multiple technologies that support EDCAPS applications. Management of Processes Configuration Management     No Reuse 2 Configuration Management Manages a CM process that works across the multiple technologies that support EDCAPS applications. Management of Processes Requirements Management     No Reuse 2 Program Management and Admin. Support Provides overall technical and management direction for the entire EDCAPS Support Services contract. Provides QA and QC functions, tracks milestone achievement, and provides project reporting. The team supervises and guides the EDCAPS contractor as a whole, thereby serving a vital intergroup-coordination function. This team provides oversight of EDCAPS activities and their status, coordinating resources and aligning efforts with overall EDCAPS objectives and operations. Management of Processes Program / Project Management     No Reuse 9 Program Management and Admin. Support Provides overall technical and management direction for the entire EDCAPS Support Services contract. Provides QA and QC functions, tracks milestone achievement, and provides project reporting. The team supervises and guides the EDCAPS contractor as a whole, thereby serving a vital intergroup-coordination function. This team provides oversight of EDCAPS activities and their status, coordinating resources and aligning efforts with overall EDCAPS objectives and operations. Management of Processes Quality Management     No Reuse 9 Systems Operation/Implementation Support Manages and maintains the EDCAPS Oracle databases and application environments on a daily basis. Utilizes the Oracle Enterprise Manager tool to monitor and administer these environments for optimum performance and minimal downtime. Provides issues-resolution support to the development, training, application and integration testing, acceptance testing, GAPS, CPSS, FMSS, and TMS teams. Refreshes the Oracle databases and applications to provide data consistency. Data Management Data Exchange     No Reuse 2 Systems Operation/Implementation Support Manages and maintains the EDCAPS Oracle databases and application environments on a daily basis. Utilizes the Oracle Enterprise Manager tool to monitor and administer these environments for optimum performance and minimal downtime. Provides issues-resolution support to the development, training, application and integration testing, acceptance testing, GAPS, CPSS, FMSS, and TMS teams. Refreshes the Oracle databases and applications to provide data consistency. Data Management Extraction and Transformation     No Reuse 2 Systems Operation/Implementation Support Manages and maintains the EDCAPS Oracle databases and application environments on a daily basis. Utilizes the Oracle Enterprise Manager tool to monitor and administer these environments for optimum performance and minimal downtime. Provides issues-resolution support to the development, training, application and integration testing, acceptance testing, GAPS, CPSS, FMSS, and TMS teams. Refreshes the Oracle databases and applications to provide data consistency. Data Management Meta Data Management     No Reuse 2 Systems Operation/Implementation Support Manages and maintains the EDCAPS Oracle databases and application environments on a daily basis. Utilizes the Oracle Enterprise Manager tool to monitor and administer these environments for optimum performance and minimal downtime. Provides issues-resolution support to the development, training, application and integration testing, acceptance testing, GAPS, CPSS, FMSS, and TMS teams. Refreshes the Oracle databases and applications to provide data consistency. Development and Integration Enterprise Application Integration     No Reuse 2 Systems Operation/Implementation Support Manages and maintains the EDCAPS Oracle databases and application environments on a daily basis. Utilizes the Oracle Enterprise Manager tool to monitor and administer these environments for optimum performance and minimal downtime. Provides issues-resolution support to the development, training, application and integration testing, acceptance testing, GAPS, CPSS, FMSS, and TMS teams. Refreshes the Oracle databases and applications to provide data consistency. Development and Integration Legacy Integration     No Reuse 2 Systems Operation/Implementation Support Manages and maintains the EDCAPS Oracle databases and application environments on a daily basis. Utilizes the Oracle Enterprise Manager tool to monitor and administer these environments for optimum performance and minimal downtime. Provides issues-resolution support to the development, training, application and integration testing, acceptance testing, GAPS, CPSS, FMSS, and TMS teams. Refreshes the Oracle databases and applications to provide data consistency. Systems Management System Resource Monitoring     No Reuse 2 Software and maintenance Software for EDCAPS platform and maintenance agreements to ensure system availability and reliability. The agreements ensure we get bug fixes and upgrades throughout the year. These are necessary to keep us current with releases. Systems Management License Management     No Reuse 11 Systems Operation/Implementation Support Manages and maintains the EDCAPS Oracle databases and application environments on a daily basis. Utilizes the Oracle Enterprise Manager tool to monitor and administer these environments for optimum performance and minimal downtime. Provides issues-resolution support to the development, training, application and integration testing, acceptance testing, GAPS, CPSS, FMSS, and TMS teams. Refreshes the Oracle databases and applications to provide data consistency. Security Management Digital Signature Management     No Reuse 2 Systems Operation/Implementation Support Manages and maintains the EDCAPS Oracle databases and application environments on a daily basis. Utilizes the Oracle Enterprise Manager tool to monitor and administer these environments for optimum performance and minimal downtime. Provides issues-resolution support to the development, training, application and integration testing, acceptance testing, GAPS, CPSS, FMSS, and TMS teams. Refreshes the Oracle databases and applications to provide data consistency. Development and Integration Data Integration     No Reuse 2 Core Systems Training Supports delivery of training to EDCAPS end users to build their skills and knowledge. The team assists with classroom training, dry-run sessions, and conference room pilots. They modify existing training documentation to accommodate resolution of software defects and reflect changes in system functionality, and maintain the training-environment with the latest production builds. Human Resources Education / Training     No Reuse 4 Systems Operation/Implementation Support Manages and maintains the EDCAPS Oracle databases and application environments on a daily basis. Utilizes the Oracle Enterprise Manager tool to monitor and administer these environments for optimum performance and minimal downtime. Provides issues-resolution support to the development, training, application and integration testing, acceptance testing, GAPS, CPSS, FMSS, and TMS teams. Refreshes the Oracle databases and applications to provide data consistency. Security Management Access Control     No Reuse 2 System Support Services Specialized consulting services including system administrators, DBAs, security analysts. Security Management Access Control     No Reuse 3 Application/Integration Testing Provides thorough testing of new EDCAPS releases. There are six scheduled releases per year as well as emergency ones as needed. The A&I team works closely with our acceptance test teams to effectively plan the components of EDCAPS releases. They maintain and update the A&I test plans, and execute the A&I test scripts for FMSS, GAPS, the e-Grants suite of applications, CPSS, TMS, internal interfaces, and external feeder-system file processing. Development and Integration Instrumentation and Testing     No Reuse 27 Architecture and Planning Support FSO in managing its technology assets and in planning the evolution of the EDCAPS platform in alignment with ED's overall IT architecture. Asset / Materials Management Computers / Automation Management     No Reuse 10 Hardware and maintenance Hardware for EDCAPS platform and maintenance agreements to ensure system availability and reliability. Asset / Materials Management Computers / Automation Management     No Reuse 4 Development Network Support Configures, administers, maintains, and troubleshoots remote site GAPS servers and GAPS/e-Grants desktops utilized by the GAPS development team. Monitors and maintains the remote site GAPS development servers and desktops on a daily basis utilizing system-monitoring tools such as Performance Analysis Web Zone (PAWZ) and Insight manager. Asset / Materials Management Computers / Automation Management     No Reuse 1 ISS Security ADP Security(testing, monitoring, scanning tools) Security Management Intrusion Detection     No Reuse 0 ISS Security ADP Security(testing, monitoring, scanning tools) Security Management Intrusion Prevention     No Reuse 0 EDNET Services Information Technology Infrastructure Services provided by the DoED EdNet Investment. Development and Integration Instrumentation and Testing Instrumentation and Testing 018-24-02-00-01-1020-00 Internal 0 EDNET Services Information Technology Infrastructure Services provided by the DoED EdNet Investment. Organizational Management Network Management Network Management 018-24-02-00-01-1020-00 Internal 0 EDNET Services Information Technology Infrastructure Services provided by the DoED EdNet Investment. Security Management Intrusion Detection Intrusion Detection 018-24-02-00-01-1020-00 Internal 0 EDNET Services Information Technology Infrastructure Services provided by the DoED EdNet Investment. Security Management Cryptography Cryptography 018-24-02-00-01-1020-00 Internal 0 Configuration Management Manages a CM process that works across the multiple technologies that support EDCAPS applications. Management of Processes Change Management     No Reuse 2

I. F. 5. Table 1. Technical Reference Model (TRM) Table:
To demonstrate how this major IT investment aligns with the FEA Technical Reference Model (TRM), please list the Service Areas, Categories, Standards, and Service Specifications supporting this IT investment.

a. Service Components identified in the previous question should be entered in this column. Please enter multiple rows for FEA SRM Components supported by multiple TRM Service Specifications
b. In the Service Specification field, agencies should provide information on the specified technical standard or vendor product mapped to the FEA TRM Service Standard, including model or version numbers, as appropriate.

FEA TRM Service Area FEA TRM Service Category FEA TRM Service Standard Service Specification (i.e., vendor and product name) Network Management Service Access and Delivery Service Requirements Hosting Internal provided by EDNET Network Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Service Transport Provided by EDNET Enterprise Application Integration Service Interface and Integration Integration Middleware Oracle PL SQL and Net 8 License Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database Oracle 10g Configuration Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Software Configuration Management Rational Enterprise Suite and Rational Clearcase Instrumentation and Testing Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Test Management Mercury Interactive Load Runner/Win Runner Enterprise Application Integration Service Platform and Infrastructure Support Platforms Platform Dependent Microsoft Windows and Sun Solaris Provided by EDNET; IBM AIX Enterprise Application Integration Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Storage IBM SAN Digital Signature Management Component Framework Security Certificates / Digital Signatures TBD Intrusion Detection Component Framework Security Supporting Security Services Intrusion Detection Services Enterprise Application Integration Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Servers / Computers Sun SunFire; Compaq ProLiant; IBM PSeries Cryptography Component Framework Security Supporting Security Services UNIX Secure Shell Enterprise Application Integration Component Framework Business Logic Platform Dependent Microsoft Visual Basic License Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Oracle Runtime;Cognos Impromtu;Cognos Query Network Management Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Provided by EDNET Enterprise Application Integration Component Framework Business Logic Platform Independent Microsoft C++ Requirements Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Modeling IBM Rational Rose Program / Project Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Integrated Development Environment IBM Rational Team Unifying Platform Quality Management Component Framework Data Management Reporting and Analysis Oracle Runtime; Cognos Impromtu; Cognos Query Data Exchange Service Access and Delivery Service Transport Supporting Network Services Provided by EDNET Access Control Service Access and Delivery Service Requirements Authentication / Single Sign-on IBM Tivoli Identity Manager, Federal Identity Manager, Tivoli IBM Directory Directory Integrator provided by EDNET Extraction and Transformation Service Interface and Integration Interoperability Data Transformation eXtensible Stylesheet Language Transform (XSLT) Meta Data Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Database / Storage Database Oracle 10g Legacy Integration Service Interface and Integration Integration Middleware Oracle PL SQL and Net 8 System Resource Monitoring Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Network Devices / Standards F5 Big - IP Change Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Software Engineering Software Configuration Management Rational Enterprise Suite and Rational Clearcase Data Integration Service Interface and Integration Integration Middleware Oracle PL SQL and Net 8 Education / Training Service Access and Delivery Delivery Channels Intranet OnDemand SW Computers / Automation Management Service Platform and Infrastructure Hardware / Infrastructure Servers / Computers Sun SunFire; Compaq ProLiant; IBM PSeries Intrusion Prevention Component Framework Security Certificates / Digital Signatures SSL

I. F. 6. Will the application leverage existing components and/or applications across the Government (i.e., FirstGov, Pay.Gov, etc)?
no

II. A. 1. Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this project?

II. A. 2. Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:
(Character Limitations: Alternative Analyzed - 250 characters; Description of Alternative - 500 Characters)

Description of Alternative Risk Lifecycle Cost Estimate Risk Lifecycle Benefits Estimate     NaN NaN

II. A. 3. Which alternative was selected by the Agency's Executive/Investment Committee and why was it chosen?
(long text - 2500 characters)

II. A. 4. What specific qualitative benefits will be realized?
(long text - 2500 characters)

II. A. 5. Will the selected alternative replace a legacy system in-part or in-whole?

UPI if available Date of the System Retirement

II. B. 1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?

II. B. 2. If there currently is no plan, will a plan be developed?

II. B. 3. Briefly describe how investment risks are reflected in the life cycle cost estimate and investment schedule:
(long text - 2500 characters)

II. C. 1. Does the earned value management system meet the criteria in ANSI/EIA Standard - 748?

II. C. 2. Is the CV or SV greater than 10%?

II. C. 3. Has the investment re-baselined during the past fiscal year?

II. C. 4. Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline
Complete the following table to compare actual performance against the current performance baseline and to the initial performance baseline. In the Current Baseline section, for all milestones listed, you should provide both the baseline and actual completion dates (e.g., "03/23/2003"/ "04/28/2004") and the baseline and actual total costs (in $ Millions). In the event that a milestone is not found in both the initial and current baseline, leave the associated cells blank. Note that the 'Description of Milestone' and 'Percent Complete' fields are required. Indicate '0' for any milestone no longer active. (Character Limitations: Description of Milestone - 500 characters)

Initial Baseline - Planned Completion Date Initial Baseline - Total Cost Current Baseline - Planned Completion Date Current Baseline - Actual Completion Date Current Baseline - Planned Total Cost Current Baseline - Actual Total Cost Current Baseline Variance - Schedule Current Baseline Variance - Cost Percent Complete

III. A. 1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?
yes

III. A. 2. If there currently is no plan, will a plan be developed?

III. B. 1. Was operational analysis conducted?
no

III. B. 2. Complete the following table to compare actual cost performance against the planned cost performance baseline. Milestones reported may include specific individual scheduled preventative and predictable corrective maintenance activities, or may be the total of planned annual operation and maintenance efforts).

(Character Limitations: Description of Milestone - 250 Characters)

Planned Completion Date Planned Total Cost Actual Completion Date Actual Total Cost Variance - Schedule Variance - Cost FY2001 Maintenance             FY2002 Maintenance             FY2003 Maintenance             FY2004 Maintenance             FY2005 Maintenance             FY2006 Maintenance             FY2007 Maintenance             FY2008 Maintenance             FY2009 Maintenance             FY2010 Maintenance             FY2011 Maintenance             FY2012 Maintenance             FY2013 Maintenance

IV. A. 1. Stakeholder Table
As a joint exhibit 300, please identify the agency stakeholders. Provide the partner agency and partner agency approval date for this joint exhibit 300.

Joint exhibit approval date

IV. A. 2. Partner Capital Assets within this Investment
Provide the partnering strategies you are implementing with the participating agencies and organizations. Identify all partner agency capital assets supporting the common solution (section 300.7); Managing Partner capital assets should also be included in this joint exhibit 300. These capital assets should be included in the Summary of Spending table of Part I, Section B. All partner agency migration investments (section 53.4) should also be included in this table. Funding contributions/fee-for-service transfers should not be included in this table. (Partner Agency Asset UPIs should also appear on the Partner Agency's exhibit 53)

Partner Agency Asset Title Partner Agency Exhibit 53 UPI

IV. A. 3. Partner Funding Strategies ($millions)
For jointly funded initiative activities, provide in the "Partner Funding Strategies Table": the name(s) of partner agencies; the UPI of the partner agency investments; and the partner agency contributions for CY and BY. Please indicate partner contribution amounts (in-kind contributions should also be included in this amount) and fee-for-service amounts. (Partner Agency Asset UPIs should also appear on the Partner Agency's exhibit 53. For non-IT fee-for-service amounts the Partner exhibit 53 UPI can be left blank) (IT migration investments should not be included in this table)

Partner Exhibit 53 UPI CY Contribution CY Fee-for-Service BY Contribution BY Fee-for-Service     NaN NaN NaN NaN

IV. A. 4. Did you conduct an alternatives analysis for this project?

IV. A. 5. Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:

IV. A. 6. Which alternative was selected by the Initiative Governance process and why was it chosen?
(long text - 2500 characters)

IV. A. 7. What specific qualitative benefits will be realized?
(long text - 2500 characters)

IV. A. 8. Table 1. Federal Quantitative Benefits ($millions):
What specific quantitative benefits will be realized (using current dollars)
Use the results of your alternatives analysis to complete the following table:

IV. A. 9. Will the selected alternative replace a legacy system in-part or in-whole?

IV. B. 1. Does the investment have a Risk Management Plan?

IV. B. 2. If there currently is no plan, will a plan be developed?

IV. C. 1. Are you using EVM to manage this investment?

IV. C. 2. Is the CV% or SV% greater than ± 10%? (CV% = CV/EV x 100; SV% = SV/PV x 100)
NOT applicable for capital assets with ONLY O&M.

IV. C. 3. Has the investment re-baselined during the past fiscal year?
Applicable to ALL capital assets

IV. C. 4. Comparison of Initial Baseline and Current Approved Baseline
Complete the following table to compare actual performance against the current performance baseline and to the initial performance baseline. In the Current Baseline section, for all milestones listed, you should provide both the baseline and actual completion dates (e.g., "03/23/2003"/ "04/28/2004") and the baseline and actual total costs (in $ Millions). In the event that a milestone is not found in both the initial and current baseline, leave the associated cells blank. Note that the 'Description of Milestone' and 'Percent Complete' fields are required. Indicate '0' for any milestone no longer active.