ABOUT   
Reports > USPTO Annual Reports
Collage showing U S P T O Director Jon Dudas, Patent Commissioner John Doll, the U S P T O 'Our Record-Breaking Year' banner, as well as images of fiscal year 2006 U S P T O activities. Image is part of the header for the U S P T O Performance and Accountability Report for Fiscal Year 2006
Performance and Accountability Report Fiscal Year 2006
Management's Discussion and Analysis

Table of Contents | Management | Financial | Auditor | IG | Other

Statement of Net Cost

The Statement of Net Cost presents the USPTO’s results of operations by Patent and Trademark business areas. The following table presents the total USPTO’s results of operations for the past four fiscal years. From fiscal years 2003 through 2005, the USPTO’s operations resulted in a net cost. However, in FY 2006, the USPTO generated a net income of $80.2 million due to the increased maintenance fees received and revenue recognition of previously deferred revenue collected subsequent to the fee increase on December 8, 2004.

Net (Cost)/Income (Dollars in Millions)
  FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006
Earned Revenue $ 1,162.3  $ 1,239.0  $ 1,372.8  $ 1,594.4 
Program Cost  (1,206.1)
single underline
 (1,289.2)
single underline
 (1,424.0)
single underline
 (1,514.2)
single underline
Net (Cost)/Income $   (43.8)
double underline
$   (50.2)
double underline
$    (51.2) 
double underline
$    80.2 
double underline

The Statement of Net Cost compares fees earned to costs incurred during a specific period of time. It is not necessarily an indicator of net income or net cost over the life of a patent or trademark. Net income or net cost for the fiscal year is dependent upon the groups of work that have been completed over the various phases of the production life cycle. The net income calculation is based on fees earned during the fiscal year being reported, regardless of when those fees were collected. Maintenance fees also play a large part in whether a total net income or net cost is recognized. Maintenance fees collected in FY 2006 are a reflection of patent issue levels 3.5, 7.5, and 11.5 years ago, rather than a reflection of patents issued in FY 2006. Therefore, maintenance fees can have a significant impact on matching costs and revenue.

While the backlog for patent applications continues to increase, increasing deferred revenue and decreasing earned revenue, during FY 2006 the Patent organization disposed of 11.3 percent more applications than were disposed of during FY 2005. In addition, the separation of the patent application fee into a discrete filing fee, search fee, and examination fee during FY 2005 resulted in an increase of $24.3 million in fees, recognized immediately as earned revenue during FY 2006.

During FY 2006, while the number of trademark applications increased 9.7 percent over the prior year, the Trademark organization was able to significantly reduce its backlog and register 31.7 percent more trademarks over FY 2005. While additional costs were incurred in reducing the backlog, the Trademark organization was able to recognize a significant increase in revenue earned.

< Previous Page | Next Page >

Is there a question about what the USPTO can or cannot do that you cannot find an answer for? Send questions about USPTO programs and services to the USPTO Contact Center (UCC). You can suggest USPTO webpages or material you would like featured on this section by E-mail to the webmaster@uspto.gov. While we cannot promise to accommodate all requests, your suggestions will be considered and may lead to other improvements on the website.


.|HOME | SITE INDEX| SEARCH | eBUSINESS | HELP | PRIVACY POLICY