Skip to Search Skip to Left Navigation U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA) Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS)Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) - Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA) - United States Department of Transportation (USDOT, US DOT or DOT)
  ABOUT RITA | CONTACT US | PRESS ROOM | CAREERS | SITE MAP
Bureau of Transportation Statistics
Data and Statistics
Bookstore
Programs
About BTS
Upcoming Press Releases
External Links
Intelligent Transportation Systems
National Transportation Library
Research, Development and Technology
Transportation Safety Institute
University Transportation Centers
Volpe National Transportation Systems Center
Printable Version

Table 4-52: Highway Noise Barrier Construction

(Miles)

Excel | CSV

  Unknown 1970-79 1980-89 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 Total
1970-98
Type I barriersa d6 102 419 44 78 113 62 48 87 34 47 114 R1,147
Type II barriersb 0 70 128 19 18 18 22 16 32 15 31 22 391
All other typesc N 2 28 0 U U U U 6 0 1 1 79
Total length 6 175 575 63 96 131 84 64 125 49 78 137 1,623
Cost (1998 $ millions) N 134 656 89 144 186 118 112 152 60 111 169 1,931

KEY: N = data do not exist; R = revised.

a A Type I barrier is built on a highway project to construct a new highway or to physically alter an existing highway.

b A Type II barrier is built to abate noise along an existing highway (often referred to as retrofit abatement) and is not mandatory.

c All other types of barriers are nonfederally funded.

d Have not been assigned a year of construction or a cost.

NOTES: Miles have been converted from kilometers.

Totals may not match the sum of yearly estimates due to rounding and converting from metric. 24 miles of barriers, while assigned a year of construction, cannot be assigned a cost. Data are produced on a 3-year cycle.

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Environment and Planning, HighwayTraffic Noise Barrier Construction Trends (Washington, DC: 2000), tables 1 and 3.