skip navigation links 
 
 Search Options 
Index | Site Map | FAQ | Facility Info | Reading Rm | New | Help | Glossary | Contact Us blue spacer  
secondary page banner Return to NRC Home Page

Escalated Enforcement Actions Issued to Reactor Licensees - W

Some links on this page are to documents in our our Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS). For additional information, see our Plugins, Viewers, and Other Tools.

Washington Nuclear 2 - Docket No. 050-00397

NRC Action Number(s) and
Facility Name
Action Type
(Severity) &
Civil Penalty
(if any)
Date
Issued
Description
EA-98-480
Washington Nuclear
NOV
(SL III)
01/29/1999 Violation involved failure to assure that a rupture of the plant's fire main would not impair equipment important to safety.
EA-97-573
Washington Nuclear
NOV
(SL III)
06/01/1998 Failure to perform an adequate safety evaluation in accordance to 10 CFR 50.59 and failure to maintain inservice testing of Valve RCIC-V-45 as required by 10 CFR 50.55a(f).
EA-97-138
Washington Nuclear
NOV
(SL III)
02/20/1998 Performance of response time measurements.
EA-96-327-I
EA-96-327
Washington Nuclear
NOVCP
(SL III)


ORDERCP
$100,000
02/14/1997

11/26/1996
This action was based on several instances in which required surveillances were not performed. In some cases, mode changes were made without assurance that required equipment was operable, and in one case, a mode change was made with one train of the control room emergency filtration system inoperable. The violations have been collectively characterized as a Severity Level III problem.
EA-96-267
Washington Nuclear
NOV
(SL III)
10/01/1996 Miscalibration of monitors resulted in inadequate dose assessment and protective action assessment process.
To top of page

Waterford 3 - Docket No. 050-00382

NRC Action Number(s) and
Facility Name
Action Type
(Severity) &
Civil Penalty
(if any)
Date
Issued
Description
EA-03-230
Waterford 3
NOV
(White)
04/12/2004 On April 12, 2004, a Notice of Violation was issued for a violation associated with a White SDP finding involving the failure to establish appropriate instruction and accomplish those instructions for installation of a fuel line for the Train A emergency diesel generator in May 2003.
EA-99-104
Waterford 3
NOV
(SL III)
06/15/1999 Failure involving access authorization program.
EA-98-479
Waterford 3
NOV
(SL III)
01/07/1999 Violation involved a failure to maintain required control of a copy of the Waterford-3 Physical Security Plan
EA-98-022
EA-98-022-W
Waterford 3

NOVCP
(SL III)

$110,000

Withdrawal

06/16/98

05/24/1999
50.59 violations involving AFW, and ECCS analysis deficiencies.
EA-97-589
Waterford 3
NOV
(SL III)
02/25/1998 ACCW inoperable.
EA-97-099
Waterford 3
NOVCP
(SL III)

$ 55,000
05/09/1997 The action was based on a Severity Level III problem consisting of: 1) a failure to assure containment fan cooler flows met Technical Specification surveillance acceptance requirements; 2) a failure to properly translate design basis information into accident analyses and specifications; 3) a failure to test containment fan cooler flows under post-accident conditions; and 4) a failure to take prompt action to resolve discrepancies between design basis documents and attained flows.
EA-96-255
Waterford 3
NOVCP
(SL III)

$ 50,000
12/26/1996 Failure to test valves pursuant to the requirements of Sections of the IST program.
EA-96-025
Waterford 3
NOVCP
(SL III)

$ 50,000
03/28/1996 Failure to implement effective actions to correct a known design deficiency in the auxiliary component cooling water system.
To top of page

Watts Bar 1 - Docket No. 050-00390

NRC Action Number(s) and
Facility Name
Action Type
(Severity) &
Civil Penalty
(if any)
Date
Issued
Description
EA-05-169
Watts Bar 1
NOV
(White)
04/07/2006 On April 7, 2006, a Notice of Violation was issued for a violation associated with a White SDP finding involving a challenge to reactor coolant system (RCS) integrity by multiple pressurizer power-operated relief valve (PORV) actuations and a challenge to RCS inventory control by loss of RCS coolant via the open PORV. This occurred on February 22, 2005, during transition to solid plant operations. The violation cited the licensee’s failure to slowly raise charging flow to fill the pressure at less than 30 gallons per minute as required by Technical Specification 5.7.1.1 and Procedure GO-6, Unit Stutdown from Hot Standby to Cold Shutdown.
EA-05-036
Watts Bar 1
NOV
(White)
04/11/2005 On April 11, 2005, a Notice of Violation was issued for a violation associated with a White SDP finding involving the licensee’s failure to promptly identify and correct silt blockage of the essential raw cooling water (ERCW) line to the 1A-A centrifugal charging pump (CCP). The violation cited the licensee’s failure to establish measures to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures and malfunctions, are promptly identified and corrected, as required in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, “Corrective Actions.”
EA-98-327
Watts Bar 1
NOVCP
(SL II)

$ 88,000
10/15/2001 On October 15, 2001, the NRC issued a Notice of Violation and Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty in the amount of $88,000 for a Severity Level II violation involving employment discrimination against a power maintenance specialist for engaging in protected activities.
To top of page

Wolf Creek - Docket No. 050-00482

NRC Action Number(s) and
Facility Name
Action Type
(Severity) &
Civil Penalty
(if any)
Date
Issued
Description
EA-96-470
Wolf Creek
NOVCP
(SL III)

$100,000
04/03/1997 The action is based on a Severity Level III problem consisting of three violations involving: (1) the failure to correct erroneous Technical Specification clarifications after being alerted of their existence by licensee Quality Assurance findings, (2) the continued existence of an erroneous Technical Specification clarification after being informed by the NRC that it was incorrect, and (3) an unauthorized change to the Technical Specifications.
EA-96-124
Wolf Creek
NOVCP
(SL III)

$300,000
07/01/1996 Frazil ice renders on train of ESW inoperable and the other train degraded; inoperable turbine driven AFW; operational inadequacies in response to icing event.
To top of page


Privacy Policy | Site Disclaimer
Wednesday, February 21, 2007