Case Nos. 89-ERA-40; 91-ERA-31; 94-ERA-5; 95-ERA-9; 95-ERA-26; 95-ERA-32

IN THE MATTER OF

GEORGE M. GILLILAN

Complainant

v.

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY

Respondent

The above case came on to be heard on the parties' joint motion to dismiss, and, it appearing that the parties have agreed that the matters in controversy in this proceeding have been fully conciliated; that the parties have further agreed that this proceeding should be dismissed with full prejudice; and that the conciliation agreement, having been reviewed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 5851(b)(2)(A)(1994), is fair to all parties and consistent with the provisions of law;

It is hereby RECOMMENDED that this proceeding be dismissed with full prejudice.

Daniel A. Sarno, Jr.

Administrative Law Judge

DATED: April 18, 1996
Newport News, Virginia

NOTICE: This RECOMMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL and the administrative file will be forwarded for review by the Secretary of Labor to the Office of Administrative Appeals, U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-4309, Frances Perkins Building, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20210. The Office of Administrative Appeals has the responsibility to advise and assist the Secretary in the preparation and issuance of final decisions in employee protection cases adjudicated under the regulations at 29 C.F.R. Parts 24 and 1978. See 55 Fed. Reg. 13250 (1990).