Comment by carlos bauza (Voter)
This is a comment on
Part 1, Chapter 2.7-A,
dated
2008/05/02 14:25:14.392 GMT-4
Our electoral process cannot rely on something as fallible and corruptible, by human intent, mechanical malfunction, and otherwise, as a computerized system. The hardware on which such a system would depend is not failsafe, and its software can miscalculate votes anywhere between the casting and the final report, by internal error or corrupt programming or use. We need physical proof of whom the public votes for so that the counting process cannot be manipulated. Paper ballots are possibly the best way to measure this.