STRATEGIC GOAL FIVE:
Fairly and Effectively Administer the Immigration and Naturalization Laws
of the United States
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE & ANNUAL GOAL 5.1: ENFORCEMENT
Secure America's borders, especially to reduce the incidence of
alien smuggling
|
5.1A Reduce the number of illegal aliens in the United States |
Background/Program Objectives:
The Immigration and Nationality Act states that the Commissioner, in consultation
with interested academicians, government agencies, and other parties, shall
provide for a system for collection and dissemination, to Congress and the public,
of information useful in evaluating the social, economic, environmental, and
demographic impact of immigration laws. The Act provides that
“such information shall include information on… the number of aliens estimated
to be present unlawfully in the United States each fiscal year.”
The initial estimates and projections reported by INS utilized the official
updated 1996 estimates of the U.S. illegal population using the detailed statistical
data from the U.S. Census Bureau. The estimates were revised for 1997-1999
based on recently released information on the foreign-born population as collected
in the 2000 Census, rather than in the 2000 Current Population Survey. INS
has improved the estimates further by identifying and eliminating those persons
from the unauthorized population who have gained temporary protection against
removal by applying for an immigration benefit. The estimated number of illegal
residents as of December 31, 1999, was reported as 6.8 million last year, but
the estimate has increased to 7.0 million this year, as a result of the improved
data and methodology.
D
D
Data Definition:
The total number of illegal aliens is an estimate of the total number
of illegal aliens residing in the U.S. as of December 31 of the reference
year. The definition of a resident corresponds to the U.S. Census
Bureau definition of usual residence (i.e., where a person spends more nights
during a year than any other place). Illegal aliens in transit or with no
place of usual residence within the United States, therefore, are not included
in the estimate. The estimate of the total number of illegal aliens is actually
based on estimates for several components according to the following formula:
Total illegal residents = (Foreign-born residents) + (Estimated undercount) –
(Legally admitted immigrants + Temporary migrants (nonimmigrants) + migrants
who have gained temporary protection against removal by applying for an immigration
benefit). Note: Legally admitted immigrants include: Aliens admitted for
legal permanent residence + Refugees admitted but not yet adjusted to Legal
Permanent Resident status - Emigrants – Deaths
Annual entries is an estimate of the annual number of illegal aliens who entered the
U.S. during the reference year and continue to reside in the U.S. as of December
31 of the year. A change in the resident illegal population between years
is equal to the difference between the number of new entrants establishing
residence during the year (entries) minus the number of prior residents
who left the illegal population during the year (departures). The
difference between entries and departures is the net change in the illegal
resident population. Note that many of the residents departing the illegal
population remain in the U.S. as legal permanent resdents. In addition,
Illegal residents leave the population through emigration, death, or removal
by INS enforcement. The definition of a resident corresponds to the
U.S. Census definition of usual residence (i.e., where a person spends more
nights during a year than any other place). Illegal aliens who entered the
U.S. during the year who are in transit or who have no usual place of residence
within the U.S., therefore, are not included in the estimate.
Data Collection
and Storage: Data are collected
from a variety of official government sources. The most important are Census
and survey data on the resident foreign-born population collected by the U.S.
Census Bureau and administrative data of legal admissions collected by INS.
The data on foreign-born residents are collected on the long-form sample during
the Decennial census, or, between Decennial censuses, with the monthly household
Current Population Survey. The Decennial census data are based on a 1 in
6 sample of all U.S. households. The Current Population Survey data are based
on a survey of approximately 50,000 households. INS administrative records
used in the estimate are for legal permanent residents, persons removed from
the U.S. by INS procedures, and estimates of nonimmigrants based on Nonimmigrant
Information System (NIIS) data. The legal permanent resident data are collected
by INS through Department of State visas and records of adjustment and recorded
in INS’ Computer-Linked Application Information Management System (CLAIMS3).
Information on INS removals is collected and recorded in INS’ service-wide
Deportable Alien Control System (DACS) by the respective field offices that
conduct the removals. Information on emigrants and deaths of illegal resident
aliens is estimated based on data and research conducted by the Census Bureau
and information reported by the Mexico-U.S. Migration Study in 1998.
Data Validation
and Verification: The census foreign-born
data are subject to the validation and verification procedures established
at the U.S. Census Bureau. Individual INS records of legal permanent residents
and persons removed by the INS are extensively reviewed to insure the validity
of the data. INS’ annual number of legal permanent residents is compared to
U.S. Department of State data on visas issued for the categories of immigrants
who require a visa, to check for completeness. INS inspectors collect data
from all arriving aliens via the Arrival/Departure Record which records name,
address, birth date, passport number, airline and flight number, country of
citizenship, country of residence, date of arrival and departure. The information
is compiled in the Nonimmigrant Information System. The estimates of emigrants
and deaths are based on research reports that are subject to the validation
and verification procedures established at the U.S. Census Bureau. Data on
the removal of criminal and non-criminal aliens are subject to extensive data
review activities by both the program office and the Statistics Division of
the INS. DACS and CLAIMS3 data verification and validation sections appear
in this plan in Strategic Objectives 5.2 and 5.3, respectively. The estimates
of emigrants and deaths of illegal immigrants are based on research reports
that are subject to the validation and verification procedures established
at the U.S. Census Bureau. The estimates of undercount of illegal residents
in the 2000 Census are consistent with those of the U.S. Census Bureau and
private researchers.
Data Limitations: The estimate for the total foreign-born population is
subject to sampling error. Assumptions of the number of persons who emigrate
or are in temporary legal status and assumptions of the coverage of the foreign-born
and illegal aliens in the Decennial census or Current Population Survey also
affect the estimate. Differences in assumptions will lead to different estimates.
The U.S. Census Bureau and several non-governmental researchers have published
their own estimates of the illegal resident population in the past. Differences
that are well within the margin of error may still raise questions about the
accuracy of the estimates. However, neither the U.S. Census Bureau nor non-governmental
researchers have been able to estimate annual inflow, departures from the
population, or net annual change in the population, so there are no benchmarks
against which to compare the estimates.
|
Performance:
Performance Measure: DISCONTINUED MEASURE: Total Number
of Illegal Aliens Residing in the United States (in millions) [INS] (NOTE: This
indicator is being discontinued - the program has been transferred to the Department
of Homeland Security) (NOTE: Prior year data has been changed as follows: The
annual estimates for 1997-1999 have been revised based on information on the
foreign born collected in the 2000 Census and improvements in estimating persons
who have obtained temporary protection against removal. The foreign-born information
in the census is based on a 1 in 6 household questionnaire [approximately 5,000,000
foreign-born households], while the previous estimates were based on a sample
of approximately 50,000 households [native and foreign-born].
The 2000 Census data provides the basis of the estimates through December 31,
1999. The December 31, 2002, projection is based on projecting net annual illegal
immigration in 2000-02 and adding it to the December 31, 1999 population.)
FY 2002 Target: Original target: 6.8
million. This was based on a .2 million reduction in illegal aliens residing
in the U.S. between 2001 and 2002 (originally estimated at 7.0 million in 2001).
This target was set without the benefit of the 1999 baseline data now available
through the 2000 Census.
FY 2002 Estimated: 7.6 million. This
reflects no measurable change in the estimated number of illegal aliens residing
in the U.S. between 2001 and 2002.
Discussion: The projected number of
illegal aliens residing in the United States as of December 31, 2002, is 7.6
million. The primary reason that the estimated number for FY 2002 is higher
than the target is due to the improved estimates of the foreign-born population
available through the 2000 census data, which significantly increases the estimated
populations for each year following 1999. The estimated size of the illegal
population remained virtually unchanged between FY 2001 and FY 2002, while INS
had projected a decrease of 200,000 in the population (see following discussion
of the number of illegal aliens entering and departing the U.S.).
Performance Measure: DISCONTINUED MEASURE: Aliens Entering and
Departing the Illegal Population formerly: Illegal Aliens Entering and
Departing the U.S. Annually [INS] (NOTE: Prior year estimates have been revised
based on new information available from the 2000 census. The average annual
number of entries of illegal aliens intending to reside in the United States
was 780,000 during the 1995-1999 period, while an average of 410,000 left the
illegal population, resulting in a net increase of 370,000 a year. The projected
average annual entries for 2000-2004 is 860,000, an average of 710,000 are expected
to leave the population, resulting in a net increase of 150,000 a year. The
entry data for 2000-2004 period are based in part on the estimated illegal entries
in 1999 as counted in the 2000 Census. (Note that many of the aliens departing
the illegally resident population remain in the United States as legal permanent
residents.)
FY 2002 Target: Original estimates:
510,000 estimated illegal alien entries
710,000 estimated illegal alien departures
This results in a net 200,000 reduction in illegal
aliens residing in the U.S. as discussed above.
FY 2002 Estimated:
775,000 estimated illegal alien entries
770,000 estimated illegal alien departures
Discussion: This results in a 5,000
increase in illegal aliens residing in the U.S., which is higher than targeted.
The projected target for illegal aliens entries for 2002 was set at 510,000.
This target was set without the benefit of the 1999 baseline data now available
through the 2000 Census. We currently estimate that the number of illegal alien
entries in 2001 was 875,000; therefore, the number of entries are estimated
to have decreased 100,000 between 2001 and 2002. Apprehensions of undocumented
aliens have generally been decreasing since FY 2000 through 2002. This can
be attributed to several factors, such as the increased level of control along
the southwest border, enhanced enforcement efforts after 9/11/2001, and the
possibility that undocumented aliens are more likely to remain in the U.S. rather
than return to their native countries, which reduces their exposure to the possibility
of apprehension upon their return to the United States.
5.1B Effectively Control the Border |
Background/Program Objectives:
At the Ports-of-Entry
Immigration Inspectors identify and examine persons seeking entry into the
United States at air, land, and sea Ports-of-Entry (POEs) in order to prevent
the entry of terrorists, criminals, and unlawful migrants. This mission entails
the full range of law enforcement and border security responsibilities balanced
with the need to foster travel and tourism and facilitate commerce.
INS works with other Federal Inspection Services to obtain and utilize
all available information before passengers arrive at United States borders
via air, land, or sea. The analysis of that data provides information necessary
to prevent illegal entry, human trafficking, and smuggling, among other crimes.
Between the Ports-of-Entry
The Border Patrol’s National Strategic Plan is the basis for a four-phased,
multi-year approach to the deployment of new resources along the U.S. borders,
initially concentrating on areas of greatest illegal entry. The strategic has
a national focus of “prevention through deterrence” as a means to restrict illegal
traffic and encourage legal entry. Deterrence is defined as raising the
risk of apprehension so high that it is futile to attempt entry. The four-phased
approach builds-up resources along the entire Southwest border as well as the
northern border and coastal areas of the U.S.
Areas with the highest concentration of illegal entry are given the highest
priority. The strategy focuses resources on specific sectors (further defined
by corridors) in priority order. Phase I includes San Diego and El Paso. Phase
II covers Tucson and McAllen. Phase III concentrates on Del Rio and Laredo and
the remainder of the Southwest border. Phase IV includes the Northern Border
and Coastal areas, as well as new areas of activity.
The primary indicator of successful deterrence is the significant reduction
followed by leveling off of attempted entry. Optimum deterrence is defined,
as the level at which applying more Border Patrol agents and resources
would not yield a significant gain in arrests/deterrence. This is a critical
point in the strategy, as it would make little sense to try to reach essentially
zero illegal entry attempts in one location while there are literally thousands
of such attempts in another. Through sufficient staffing in recent years, the
Border Patrol has profiled and predicted the trend pattern to reaching optimum
deterrence. After several years of staffing increases, a peak is reached in
staffing levels and arrests, followed by a reduction in illegal entry attempts
(deterrence), culminating in a leveling off of both resources and arrests (optimum
deterrence). It can take up to 6-8 years to reach optimum deterrence provided
there are sufficient resources.
Although an eventual reduction in arrests is a primary indicator of illegal
entry attempts (and therefore deterrence), other critical indicators include:
decrease in border related crime, decrease in recidivism, shifting of illegal
activity to non-traditional points of entry and through non-traditional methods,
increase in smuggling fees, increase in property values and commercial and public
development along the border, etc. Each of these factors is part of a comprehensive
analysis conducted for each area. The effectiveness of the Border Patrol’s National
Strategic Plan is evidenced by the significant changes in illegal entry attempts
in the San Diego, California, El Paso and Brownsville, Texas, and the Nogales,
Arizona border areas. The ultimate impact is the increase in quality of life
in these areas.
As a result of the events of September 11, 2001, the Border Patrol redirected
its attention forward into Phase IV of the National Strategy expanding its focus
to include the Northern Border and coastal areas of the U.S. Additional Border
Patrol Agents and Aircraft Pilots were deployed to the northern border and the
Border Patrol expanded its Integrated Border Enforcement Team (IBET) to all
sectors along the Northern Border. The IBET increases cooperation and exchange
of intelligence between other Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies.
Representatives of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police are an integral part of
the IBET teams.
D
|
Phase I |
# of Corridors |
FY94 |
FY95 |
FY96 |
FY97 |
FY98 |
FY99 |
FY00 |
FY01 |
FY02 |
San Diego |
2 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
El Paso |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
2 |
Phase II |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tucson |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
McAllen |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
Phase III |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Laredo |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Del Rio |
2 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
El Centro |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Yuma |
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Marfa |
3 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
Data Definitions: Operational effectiveness is defined
as apprehensions plus turn backs (the attempt was thwarted),
divided by attempts. Attempts are compiled by adding apprehensions
plus evadees (successful illegal entries) plus turn backs.
Evadees and turn backs are estimated by Border Patrol agents using
information from video cameras, infrared scopes, helicopter patrols,
sensor hits, and tracks, etc. Optimum deterrence is further
analyzed by evaluating: increase in traffic outside of targeted
corridors, decrease in attempted illegal entries, decrease in violent
acts against law enforcement, and utilization of “non-traditional”
entry routes.
Data Collection and Storage: Data are compiled by zones
and aggregated at the Sector level into Sector corridors. Data
collected include: activity (arrests, evadees, turn backs), narcotics
seizures (number, type, weight), personnel (permanent, detailed
in or out), technology (lighting, cameras, barriers, sensors, vehicles),
narrative reports (trends, Incidents, factors affecting entry),
and additional monthly statistics (IDENT/ENFORCE usage, crime rates).
Data Validation and Verification: On a monthly basis, nationwide
reporting occurs via the Performance Analysis System (PAS) database.
Monthly reviews and editing of apprehension data in PAS is conducted
at the Sector level and by the centralized INS Statistics Division.
Increasingly, review and editing involves using systems counts from
ENFORCE/IDENT.
Data Limitations: Standardization of recording and reporting
of data is ongoing. Data collection is currently an intensive manual
process. The use of INS’ Intranet to extract existing data from
automated systems such as ENFORCE and ICAD along with auxiliary
data not yet automated, is being tested at limited pilot sites.
The national implementation of such operational data will be used
to access and analyze operational effectiveness Patrol Strategy.
|
Performance:
Performance Measure: DISCONTINUED MEASURE: High
Priority Border Corridors Demonstrating Optimum Deterrence (NOTE: This indicator
is being discontinued - the program has been transferred to the Department of
Homeland Security)
FY 2002 Target: 8
FY 2002 Actual: 8
Discussion: The Border Patrol met the FY2002 target
of eight high priority border corridors demonstrating optimal deterrence. In
addition, all nine southwest border sectors demonstrated an increase in operational
effectiveness (above the FY 2000 baseline) in one
or more corridors. This increase in effectiveness was accomplished while expanding
Border Patrol operations to address concerns that arose subsequent to the events
of September 11, 2001.
5.1C Identify, Disrupt and Dismantle Alien Smuggling and
Trafficking Organizations |
Background/Program Objectives:
Data
Definition: Identification: the
process of conducting investigations and gathering evidence and
intelligence to name participants and their criminal associates
violating Federal U.S. immigration laws. Since these are complex
investigations, cases identified in one year produce outcomes in
later years.
Disruption: occurs when a targeted organization
is adversely impacted as a result of INS enforcement actions. Indicators
of disruption include changes in organizational leadership, trafficking
patterns, smuggling infrastructure, or smuggling methods. This may
include disruptive actions taken by another agency or government
at the request of, or in coordination, with the INS.
Dismantlement: occurs when an identified
organization is no longer capable of operating as a coordinated
criminal enterprise.
Data Collection and Storage: Data are collected
in the Performance Analysis System (PAS) and through manual tracking.
INS collects investigations data in the PAS which contains aggregate
case data and workyears for specific categories of activities.
The field enters data into PAS each month.
Data Validation and Verification: PAS verification
is conducted by the Statistics Office of the Office of Policy and
Planning. The statistics are corroborated through submission audits;
and logic, range, and computational edits. The Office of Statistics
produces monthly statistical and production reports. Some manual
tracking is required for smuggling and fraud since performance categories
for types of cases no longer exactly match the definitions and methodology
of the existing PAS categories. This manual case information is
collected and verified by headquarters staff.
Data Limitations: PAS records are complete
with 95% of field office records entered within the first 8 working
days of the reporting month. The remaining 5% are subsequently
obtained through submission audits. Since PAS data are manually
consolidated at an office level, audits of individual case records
cannot be performed. |
|
|
The growing volume and sophistication of alien smuggling organizations poses
a threat to the national security of the U.S. to the success of the INS’ Border
Control and Interior Enforcement Strategies. Public corruption and lax immigration
controls in source and transit countries contribute to a smuggling organization's
ability to move large groups of migrants from virtually any country in the world
to the U.S.
The National Anti-Smuggling Strategy focuses on deterring, disrupting, and
dismantling major smuggling organizations operating in the U.S., source, and
transit countries. After September 11, 2001, the INS Anti-Smuggling Strategy
placed significant emphasis on targeting alien smuggling organizations that
present threats to national security. Terrorists and their associates are likely
to align with specific alien smuggling networks to obtain entry into the U.S.
Some smuggling organizations utilize their illicit profits to provide financial
support to terrorist organizations. INS activity in this area will target specific
smuggling corridors, and will emphasize long-term, complex investigations targeting
smuggling organizations that present a threat to national security. Specific
investigative targets have been identified, based on recommendations from the
Interagency Working Group (including INS, FBI, DOJ, and the Intelligence Community)
on alien smuggling.
To effectively combat threats to our security, INS targets smuggling organizations
with ties to extremists overseas. Targeting these groups in source and transit
countries increases the ability to protect our homeland, increases our intelligence
gathering efforts, enhances our efforts at the border, and enhances our efforts
to completely dismantle those organizations that present the greatest threats
to our security.
Performance:
Performance Measure: DISCONTINUED MEASURE: Targeted Alien Smuggling
& Trafficking Organizations Identified, Disrupted, and Dismantled [INS]
(NOTE: This indicator is being discontinued - the program has been transferred
to the Department of Homeland Security)
FY 2002 Target:
Identify 3, Disrupt 1, Dismantle 0
FY 2002 Actual:
Identified 16, Disrupted 7, Dismantled 1
Discussion: INS exceeded its goals in FY 2002 for
the number of targeted alien smuggling and trafficking organizations identified
and disrupted. INS conducted investigations of the most significant alien smuggling
organizations and alien smugglers. Many of the operations were conducted in
Central and South America, particularly in Guatemala, Mexico, Ecuador, and the
Caribbean. The majority of the 16 organizations identified and the 7 organizations
disrupted were operating in this area of the world.
5.1D Deter Illegal Immigraiton at the Source |
Background/Program Objectives:
Data Collection and Storage:
Data are compiled daily on the G-23.34 Workload summary submitted
by INS offices in respective foreign countries and reported to the
District Office level. The District Office forwards that data to
the Office of International Affairs and to the Performance Analysis
System (PAS) database.
Data Validation and Verification: On a monthly
basis, overseas district offices report a summary of the number
of interceptions to the Office of International Affairs. The same
information is provided to the INS PAS.
Data Limitations: Major discrepancies in
the collection of data have been identified, corrective action is
underway, and expected to be completed prior to the end of FY 2002.
|
|
|
INS enforcement activity overseas is dedicated to halting illegal immigration
at its source and in transit in order to safeguard our borders. By intercepting
mala fide and undocumented travelers; targeting and prosecuting known alien
smugglers and traffickers, disrupting smuggling operations that may support
potential terrorists, and repatriating migrants involved in these operations,
INS’ efforts overseas are keeping our borders safe and keeping out individuals
who present national security concerns. Targeted enforcement actions overseas
strengthen the legal immigration process and save INS costly processing, detention,
and removal of aliens who may gain access illegally to the United States.
Expanded INS enforcement-dedicated resources overseas will result in stronger
and more coordinated investigations, higher numbers of mala fide and undocumented
interceptions will occur, thus pushing back our borders and increasing security.
These actions will send a clear message to potential terrorists, criminals
and undocumented migrants that their efforts to violate our borders will not
succeed.
Performance:
Performance Measure: DISCONTINUED MEASURE: Interception
of Mala Fide and Offshore Travelers en route to the United States [INS] (NOTE:
This indicator is being discontinued - the program has been transferred to the
Department of Homeland Security)
(NOTE: Major discrepancies in the collection of data were identified and corrected
in FY 2002.)
FY 2002 Target: 20,000
FY 2002 Actual: 90,000
Discussion: The FY 2002 target was exceeded
due to Operation Bus Bound, which was conducted in cooperation with Mexico and
Guatemala which resulted significant increases in interceptions of undocumented
aliens enroute to the U.S.
STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE & ANNUAL GOAL 5.2: CRIMINAL ALIENS
Promote public safety by combating immigration-related crimes and
removing individuals, especially criminals, who are unlawfully present
in the United States |
5.2A Increase the Number of Criminal Alien Removals and
Monitor Alien Overstays |
Background/Program Objectives:
Data Definition:
Unexecuted Final Orders – Removable Aliens: Aliens that have
been issued final orders of removal but who have not been removed
at the time of the report. Some of these aliens have been officially
notified to report for their deportation, but have failed to do
so. These are termed “absconders. Aliens “not readily removable:”
include those who are incarcerated, officially designated as in
a Temporary Protected Status, and aliens from countries with whom
the US does not have repatriation agreements. Expedited Removal:
The formal removal of an alien ordered removed by the INS after
having been inspected and found to be inadmissible based on having
no documents or fraudulent documents.
Data Collection and Storage: INS collects
removal and detention data in the Deportable Alien Control System
(DACS) case tracking system. Data is input daily from physical
Alien-files, primarily by INS Deportation Program staff, and to
a lesser extent, inspectors and agents. DACS is updated throughout
the life cycle of the case.
Data Validation and Verification: DACS verification
occurs through the headquarters DACS quality team, file reviews,
comparison with monthly statistical reports, INSPECT team reviews,
and district status reports and call-up lists. The Statistics Office
of the Office of Policy and Planning conducts monthly quality reviews
of DACS data. The verification of an alien’s lawful status by the
Law Enforcement Support Center (LESC) includes interfaces with DACS
and other corporate information systems such as the Central Index
System (CIS). INS also interfaces with the NCIC to report wanted
and deported alien felons.
Data Limitations: DACS removals records
are complete, with 99 percent of total removals records entered
within 6 months of the close of the fiscal year. A small but significant
number of detention records (approximately 7 percent of over one
hundred thousand records) are incomplete. The long-range plan is
for DACS to migrate to the Enforcement Case Tracking System (ENFORCE)
that will have the capability to track detention and removal cases.
A new system the ENFORCE Removal Module (EREM) should permit the
reduction of data entry errors, increase completeness and accuracy
of data retrieval and provide greater data integrity.
|
|
|
INS is legally required to remove aliens who have received formal removal orders
or who have volunteered to be repatriated. A fundamental part of this mission
is to ensure the removal of the criminal element in the alien population. INS
is adopting new policies and procedures to improve the effectiveness of the
Institutional Removal Program, a program designed to identify and remove incarcerated
criminal aliens by means of administrative or hearing processes before their
release from custody. Focusing on the criminal alien removals enhances the
promotion of public safety.
Another challenge is identifying and removing persons who are in the U.S. illegally,
including monitoring alien overstays. Knowing who has entered and who has departed
our country in real time is an important element in enforcing our laws. The
Data Management Improvement Act of 2000 requires INS to develop a fully-automated,
integrated entry-exit data collection system and deploy this system at airports
and seaports by the end of FY 2003; at the 50 largest land ports-of-entry (POEs)
by the end of FY 2004; and all other POEs by the end of FY 2005. The legislation
also requires a private sector role to ensure that any systems developed to
collect data do not harm tourism or trade.
Performance:
Performance Measure: DISCONTINUED/REFINED MEASURE:
Final Order Removals, Expedited Removals, and Unexecuted Orders formerly:
Final Order Alien Removals [INS] (NOTE: This indicator is being discontinued
- the program has been transferred to the Department of Homeland Security)
FY 2002 Target:
Criminal Removals: 65,000
Non-Criminal Removals: 42,500
Unexecuted Final Orders – Removable Aliens:
289,000
FY 2002 Actual:
Criminal Removals: 67,946
Non-Criminal: 45,504
Expedited Removals: 33,945
Unexecuted Final Orders – Removable Aliens 406,000
Discussion: INS exceeded both the criminal
and non-criminal removal targets for FY 2002. INS re-evaluated the unexecuted
final orders measure in FY 2002. After an in-depth review and validation
of the data encompassing all active cases in the INS database, including
absconders and all other forms of unexecuted final order cases, INS revised
the measure to include all removable aliens, not just absconders. As of
September 30, 2002, there was a 406,000 case backlog of removable unexecuted
final orders and a 196,000 case backlog of not readily removable unexecuted
final orders of removal, for a total of 602,000 unexecuted orders. [NOTE:
Aliens “not readily removable” include those who are incarcerated, officially
designated as in a Temporary Protected Status, and those who are nationals
of Laos, Vietnam or Cuba (countries with whom the US does not have repatriation
agreements).]
|