Mosquito and Fly Research Unit Site Logo
ARS Home About Us Helptop nav spacerContact Us En Espanoltop nav spacer
Printable VersionPrintable Version     E-mail this pageE-mail this page
Agricultural Research Service United States Department of Agriculture
Search
  Advanced Search
Programs and Projects
Achievements
Air Curtain
Deployed War-Fighter Protection (DWFP) Program
Mosquito Insectary
Protection and Prevention
 

Research Project: SURVEILLANCE AND ECOLOGY OF MOSQUITO, BITING AND FILTH BREEDING INSECTS

Location: Mosquito and Fly Research Unit

Title: CAN THE MOSQUITO LANDING RATE ON HUMANS BE PREDICTED FROM CDC LIGHT TRAP COLLECTIONS?

Authors

Submitted to: American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Publication Type: Abstract
Publication Acceptance Date: November 29, 2005
Publication Date: December 11, 2005
Citation: Barnard, D.R., Knue, G.J., Kline, D.L., Bernier, U.R., Allan, S.A., Linthicum, K.J. 2005. Can the mosquito landing rate on humans be predicted from cdc light trap collections?. American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene.

Technical Abstract: Landing rates (LR) for Aedes albopictus, Anopheles quadrimaculatus, Culex nigripalpus, Cx. quinquefasciatus, and Ochlerotatus triseriatus on a human subject were compared with collections of each species using a CDC light trap (CDC) baited with carbon dioxide during eight different observation times (Periods) in the diel (24 hour) period. On a catch-per-unit-effort basis, the capture efficiency ratio (LR/CDC) ranged from 3:1 (Cx. quinquefasciatus) to 36:1 (Oc.triseriatus) and favored the LR method in all cases. For Ae. albopictus, LR can be estimated from CDC capture responses in Periods 7 and 8. For An. quadrimaculatus, Cx. nigripalpus, and Cx. quinquefasciatus, LR can be estimated from CDC capture responses in, respectively, Periods 2 and 3, Periods 1 thru 4, and in Period 1. Bounds on error of estimated LR varies depending on the mosquito species but exceeds one order of magnitude for estimates of LR for Ae. albopictus, An. quadrimaculatus, and Cx. nigripalpus. Differences in mosquito activity indicated by each collection method suggest that LR and CDC methods may sample different components (or phases) of the mosquito population and/or simultaneously stimulate competitive response patterns in individual females.

   

 
Project Team
Kline, Daniel - Dan
Barnard, Donald - Don
Linthicum, Kenneth - Ken
Clark, Gary
Bernier, Ulrich - Uli
Allan, Sandra - Sandy
Geden, Christopher - Chris
Hogsette, Jerome - Jerry
 
Publications
   Publications
 
Related National Programs
  Veterinary, Medical and Urban Entomology (104)
 
Related Projects
   REDUCING RISK OF HUMAN AND DOMESTICATED ANIMAL INFECTION WITH WEST NILE AND OTHER EMERGING INFECTIOUS VIRUSES CARRIED BY MOSQUITOES
   REMOTELY SENSED SATELLITE CLIMATE & ENVIRONMENTAL DATA TO DETECT ELEVATED POPULATIONS OF MOSQUITO VECTORS OF EMERGING ARBOVIRUSES IN THE US
   MODELING AND PREDICTION OF ATTRACTANTS AND INHIBITORS
   DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF DIGITAL THERMOMETER/RELATIVE HUMIDITY RECORDING DEVICES WITH REMOTE DOWNLOADING CAPABILITIES
 
 
Last Modified: 11/05/2008
ARS Home | USDA.gov | Site Map | Policies and Links 
FOIA | Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Nondiscrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House