Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans, Florida: Tampa
Bay Area Maintenance Plan Update
[Federal Register: March 29, 2004 (Volume 69, Number 60)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 16167-16172]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr29mr04-3]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[FL-90-200322(a); FRL-7640-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans, Florida: Tampa
Bay Area Maintenance Plan Update
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The EPA is approving revisions to the State Implementation
Plan (SIP) submitted by the Florida Department of Environmental
Protection (FDEP) on December 20, 2002. This SIP revision satisfies the
requirement of the Clean Air Act (CAA) as amended in 1990 for the
second 10-year update for the Tampa Bay area (Hillsborough and Pinellas
Counties) 1-hour ozone maintenance plan. For transportation purposes,
EPA is also finalizing its adequacy determination of the new Motor
Vehicle Emissions Budgets (MVEBs) for the year 2015. EPA has determined
that the MVEBs for the year 2015 contained in this SIP revision are
adequate for transportation conformity purposes.
DATES: This direct final rule is effective May 28, 2004, without
further notice, unless EPA receives adverse comment by April 28, 2004.
If adverse comment is received, EPA will publish a timely withdrawal of
the direct final rule in the Federal Register and inform the public
that the rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by mail to: Sean Lakeman,
Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides
and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Comments
may also be submitted electronically, or through hand delivery/courier.
Please follow the detailed instructions described in sections V.B.1.
through 3. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Lakeman, Air, Pesticides & Toxics
Management Division, Air Planning Branch, Regulatory Development
Section, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4, Atlanta Federal
Center, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Mr.
Lakeman's phone number is (404) 562-9043. He can also be reached via
electronic mail at lakeman.sean@epa.gov or Lynorae Benjamin, Air,
Pesticides & Toxics Management Division, Air Planning Branch, Air
Quality Modeling & Transportation Section, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region 4, Atlanta Federal Center, 61 Forsyth Street,
SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Ms. Benjamin's phone number is (404)
562-9040. She can also be reached via electronic mail at
benjamin.lynorae@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The air quality maintenance plan is a requirement of the 1990 CAA
for nonattainment areas that come into compliance with the national
ambient air quality standard (NAAQS). The Tampa Bay area (Hillsborough
and Pinellas Counties) was not in compliance with the 1-hour ozone air
quality standard until 1990, when air quality measurements showed
compliance with the standard. The State subsequently requested that EPA
redesignate these counties as
[[Page 16168]]
attainment/maintenance for the 1-hour ozone standard. Included with
this request was a 10-year air quality maintenance plan covering the
years 1995 to 2005. This plan was developed in accordance with the
appropriate guidelines. The EPA published approval of this plan on
December 7, 1995, with an effective date of February 6, 1996 (60 FR
62748).
Subsequent revisions to this maintenance plan have been made. The
current plan was approved by EPA on August 15, 2002, and became
effective on October 15, 2002 (66 FR 53314). FDEP revised the original
plan to update emissions inventories reflecting more accurate emission
estimates, to define specific MVEBs, and to remove emissions reduction
credits attributable to the motor vehicle inspection program (MVIP) (67
FR 53314).
II. Analysis of State's Submittal
On December 20, 2002, the FDEP submitted revisions to Florida's SIP
to provide a 10-year update to the maintenance plan as required by
section 175A(b) of the CAA as amended in 1990. The underlying strategy
of the maintenance plan is to maintain compliance with the 1-hour ozone
standard by assuring that current and future emissions of Volitile
Organic Compound (VOC) and Nitrogen Oxide (NOX) remain at or
below attainment year emission levels. The estimated emissions of ozone
precursors (i.e., VOC and NOX) for the two counties for the
Tampa Bay area during the 1990 ozone season are provided in the
following table. Projected VOC and NOX emissions for 2005
and 2015 are also provided.
Volatile Organic Compounds
[tons per day]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1990 base
VOC Category year 2005 2015
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hillsborough.............................. Stationary Point............. 11 9.3 10.7
Stationary Area.............. 49.4 67.4 79.1
On-Road Mobile............... 100.8 42.9 23.6
Non-Road Mobile.............. 28.7 21.4 16.5
Biogenic..................... 165.2 165.2 165.2
--------------
Total................................. n/a.......................... 355.1 306.2 295.1
Safety Margin............................. Calculated as 1990 base-year n/a 48.9 60
minus projected year total.
Pinellas.................................. Stationary Point............. 6.7 3.6 4.4
Stationary Area.............. 50.8 44.6 51.8
On-Road Mobile............... 76.9 24.6 12.3
Non-Road Mobile.............. 24.1 17.9 13.9
Biogenic..................... 25.9 25.9 25.9
--------------
Total................................. n/a.......................... 184.4 116.6 108.3
Safety Margin............................. Calculated as 1990 base-year n/a 67.8 76.1
minus projected year total.
--------------
Overall Total......................... n/a.......................... 539.5 422.8 403.4
==============
Total Safety Margin............... n/a.......................... n/a 116.7 136.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nitrogen Oxide
[tons per day]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1990 base
NOX Category year 2005 2015
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hillsborough.............................. Stationary Point............. 300.7 40.4 40.7
Stationary Area.............. 1.3 3.2 3.6
On-Road Mobile............... 89 73.4 30.3
Non-Road Mobile.............. 38.2 43.4 35.5
Biogenic..................... 1.6 1.6 1.6
--------------
Total................................. n/a.......................... 430.8 162 111.7
Safety Margin............................. Calculated as 1990 base-year n/a 268.8 319.1
minus projected year total.
Pinellas.................................. Stationary Point............. 19.1 22.4 24.5
Stationary Area.............. 8.7 3.5 3.8
On-Road Mobile............... 67.9 42 15.8
Non-Road Mobile.............. 20.3 24.2 19.8
Biogenic..................... 0.2 0.2 0.2
--------------
Total................................. n/a.......................... 116.2 92.3 64.1
Safety Margin............................. Calculated as 1990 base-year n/a 23.9 52.1
minus projected year total.
--------------
Overall Total......................... n/a.......................... 546.9 254.3 175.8
==============
Total Safety Margin............... n/a.......................... n/a 292.7 371.2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 16169]]
This SIP revision satisfies the requirement of the CAA for the
second 10-year update for the Tampa Bay area 1-hour ozone maintenance
plan. Changes to the current maintenance plan include revisions to the
emissions inventory for both on-road and non-road mobile sources,
reflecting improved methodologies contained in the MOBILE6 and NONROAD
emission models. New emissions data for both the base year (1990
attainment year) and the projected years (2005 and 2015) are
calculated.
III. Finalization of MVEBs Adequacy Determination for Transportation
Conformity Purposes
The second 10-year update for the Tampa Bay area 1-hour ozone
maintenance plan also contains updated MVEBs in support of the
transportation conformity process. These updated MVEBs are defined for
VOC and NOX for each county in the Tampa Bay maintenance
area. The updated budgets for 2005 replace the previous MVEBs contained
in the first maintenance plan, which were based on an older emissions
estimate using MOBILE5 emission factors for on-road motor vehicles.
Additionally, this maintenance plan update provides new MVEBs for the
year 2015.
The availability of the SIP with MVEBs for 2015 was placed on EPA's
adequacy web page on January 7, 2003. No request for this SIP submittal
or adverse comments were received by the end of the public comment
period on February 7, 2003. In this action, EPA finds the 2015 MVEBs
adequate for transportation conformity, and is approving the MVEBs for
2005 and 2015. Note, since the 2005 MVEB are replacing existing 2005
MVEBs, these budgets are not subject to EPA's adequacy process. This is
because EPA generally will not review the adequacy of a budget from a
submitted SIP that revises an existing approved SIP with budgets for
the same year and CAA requirement because as a matter of law, a
submitted SIP may not supersede an approved SIP for the same CAA
requirement, year, and pollutant (68 FR 38974).
Under the CAA, States are required to submit, at various times,
control strategy SIPs and maintenance plans in ozone areas. These
control strategy SIPs (e.g., reasonable further progress SIPs and
attainment demonstration SIPs) and maintenance plans create MVEBs for
criteria pollutants and/or their precursors to address pollution from
cars and trucks. The MVEBs are the portion of the total allowable
emissions that is allocated to highway and transit vehicle use and
emissions. The MVEBs serve as a ceiling on emissions from an area's
planned transportation system. The MVEB concept is further explained in
the preamble to the November 24, 1993, transportation conformity rule
(58 FR 62188). The preamble also describes how to establish the MVEBs
in the SIP and revise the MVEBs.
Under section 176(c) of the CAA, new transportation projects, such
as the construction of new highways, must ``conform'' to (e.g., be
consistent with) the part of the State's air quality plan that
addresses pollution from cars and trucks. ``Conformity'' to the SIP
means that transportation activities will not cause new air quality
violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of
the national ambient air quality standards. If a transportation plan
does not ``conform,'' most projects that would expand the capacity of
roadways cannot go forward. Regulations at 40 CFR part 93 set forth by
EPA policy, criteria, and procedures for demonstrating and assuring
conformity of such transportation activities to a SIP.
When reviewing submitted ``control strategy'' SIPs or maintenance
plans containing MVEBs, EPA must affirmatively find the MVEBs budget
contained therein ``adequate'' for use in determining transportation
conformity before they can be used for such purposes. Once EPA
affirmatively finds the submitted MVEB is adequate for transportation
conformity purposes, that MVEB can be used by the state and federal
agencies in determining whether proposed transportation projects
``conform'' to the state implementation plan as required by section
176(c) of the Clean Air Act. EPA's substantive criteria for determining
``adequacy'' of MVEBs is set out in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4).
EPA's process for determining ``adequacy'' consists of three basic
steps: public notification of a SIP submission, a public comment
period, and EPA's adequacy finding. This process for determining the
adequacy of submitted SIP MVEBs is set out in EPA's May 14, 1999
guidance, ``Conformity Guidance on Implementation of March 2, 1999,
Conformity Court Decision.'' This guidance is incorporated into EPA's
June 30, 2003, proposed rulemaking entitled ``Transportation Conformity
Rule Amendments: Response to Court Decision and Additional Rule
Changes'' (68 FR 38974). EPA follows this guidance in making its
adequacy determination.
Specific emissions budgets are defined for VOC and NOX
for the Tampa Bay area in the Florida submittal. Pursuant to 40 CFR
93.124(d), Tampa Bay has elected to allocate subarea budgets for each
of the counties for the purpose of transportation conformity. The
specific MVEBs for Hillsborough County in 2005 and 2015 are 53.6 tpd
for VOC and 91.8 tpd for NOX. Pinellas County's MVEBs for
2005 and 2015 are 30.8 tpd for VOC and 52.5 tpd for NOX.
With this allocation, each county must demonstrate conformity to the
county-specific subarea budgets. The chart below provides a summary of
the county-specific subarea budgets.
MVEB
[tons per day]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
County Pollutant 2005 2015
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hillsborough..................... VOC................ 53.6 53.6
NOX................ 91.8 91.8
Pinellas......................... VOC................ 30.8 30.8
NOX................ 52.5 52.5
Total........................ VOC................ 84.4 84.4
NOX................ 144.3 144.3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The MVEBs are defined for each Tampa Bay county, for 2005 and 2015,
in the State's submittal. The values, for both years, are equal to the
2005 on-road mobile source projected level of emissions plus a buffer
of 25 percent. This buffer, which is an allocation from the safety
margin, accounts for uncertainty in the projections and is available
because of significant reductions of VOC and NOX that have
occurred, and are projected to occur, primarily from mobile sources.
The MVEBs are constrained in each of the budget years to assure that
the total emissions (i.e., all source categories) do not exceed the
1990 attainment year emissions. In no case are the projected total
emissions from mobile sources for any year, greater than the attainment
year emissions totals for either VOC or NOX.
Under 40 CFR 93.101, the term safety margin is the difference
between the attainment level (from all sources) and the projected level
of emissions (from all sources) in the maintenance plan. The attainment
level of emissions is the level of emissions during one of the years in
which the area met the air quality health standard. The safety margin
credit can be allocated to the transportation sector, however the total
emission level must stay below the attainment level.
[[Page 16170]]
Safety Margins
[tons per day]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOC 2005 2015 NOX 2005 2015
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hillsborough
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Safety Margin............................... 48.9 60 Safety Margin................. 268.8 319.1
Allocation to MVEB.......................... 10.7 30 Allocation to MVEB............ 18.4 76
Remaining Safety Margin after partial 38.2 30 Remaining Safety Margin after 250.4 243.1
allocation. partial allocation.
---------------------------------------------
Pinellas
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Safety Margin............................... 67.8 76.1 Safety Margin................. 23.9 52.1
Allocation to MVEB.......................... 6.2 18.5 Allocation to MVEB............ 10.5 36.7
Remaining Safety Margin after partial 61.6 57.6 Remaining Safety Margin after 13.4 15.4
allocation. partial allocation.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving the second 10-year update for the Tampa Bay 1-hour
ozone maintenance plan. In this action, EPA also finds the 2015 MVEBs
adequate for transportation conformity purposes and is approving the
MVEBs for 2005 and 2015. EPA's adequacy determination for the 2015
MVEBs is based on EPA's finding that the substantive criteria for
determining adequacy of a MVEB, under 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4), have been
met. The MVEBs will be available for use upon the effective date of
this action. The MVEBs, based on the on-road mobile sources, are to be
used by the local metropolitan planning organizations and
transportation authorities to assure that transportation plans,
programs, and projects are consistent with, and conform to, the long
term maintenance of acceptable air quality in the Tampa Bay area.
The EPA is publishing this rule without prior proposal because the
Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no
adverse comments. However, in the proposed rules section of this
Federal Register publication, EPA is publishing a separate document
that will serve as the proposal to approve the SIP revision should
adverse comments be filed. This rule will be effective May 28, 2004,
without further notice unless the Agency receives adverse comments by
April 28, 2004.
If the EPA receives such comments, then EPA will publish a document
withdrawing the final rule and informing the public that the rule will
not take effect. All public comments received will then be addressed in
a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. The EPA will not
institute a second comment period. Parties interested in commenting
should do so at this time. If no such comments are received, the public
is advised that this rule will be effective on May 28, 2004, and no
further action will be taken on the proposed rule. Please note that if
we receive adverse comment on an amendment, paragraph, or section of
this rule and if that provision may be severed from the remainder of
the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are
not the subject of an adverse comment.
V. General Information
A. How Can I Get Copies of This Document and Other Related Information?
1. The Regional Office has established an official public
rulemaking file available for inspection at the Regional Office. EPA
has established an official public rulemaking file for this action
under FL-90. The official public file consists of the documents
specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received,
and other information related to this action. Although a part of the
official docket, the public rulemaking file does not include
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public rulemaking
file is the collection of materials that is available for public
viewing at the Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch,
Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia
30303-8960. EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the
contact listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's official hours of
business are Monday through Friday, 9 to 3:30, excluding Federal
holidays.
2. Copies of the State submittal and EPA's technical support
document are also available for public inspection during normal
business hours, by appointment, at the State Air Agency. Florida
Department of Environmental Protection, Twin Towers Office Building,
2600 Blair Stone Road, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400.
3. Electronic Access. You may access this Federal Register document
electronically through the Regulation.gov Web site located at http://
www.regulations.gov
where you can find, review, and submit
comments on Federal rules that have been published in the Federal
Register, the Government's legal newspaper, and are open for comment.
For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA's policy is
that public comments, whether submitted electronically or on paper,
will be made available for public viewing at the EPA Regional Office,
as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing
copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in
the version of the comment that is placed in the official public
rulemaking file. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted
material, will be available at the Regional Office for public inspection.
B. How and To Whom Do I Submit Comments?
You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand
delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the
appropriate rulemaking identification number by including the text
``Public comment on proposed rulemaking FL-90'' in the subject line on
the first page of your comment. Please ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after
the close of the comment period will be marked ``late.'' EPA is not
required to consider these late comments.
1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as prescribed
[[Page 16171]]
below, EPA recommends that you include your name, mailing address, and
an e-mail address or other contact information in the body of your
comment. Also include this contact information on the outside of any
disk or CD-ROM you submit, and in any cover letter accompanying the
disk or CD-ROM. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. EPA's policy is that EPA
will not edit your comment, and any identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will be included as part of the
comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made
available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
i. E-mail. Comments may be sent by electronic mail (e-mail) to
lakeman.sean@epa.gov. Please include the text ``Public comment on
proposed rulemaking FL-90'' in the subject line. EPA's e-mail system is
not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an e-mail comment
directly without going through Regulations.gov, EPA's e-mail system
automatically captures your e-mail address. E-mail addresses that are
automatically captured by EPA's e-mail system are included as part of
the comment that is placed in the official public docket, and made
available in EPA's electronic public docket.
ii. Regulation.gov. Your use of Regulation.gov is an alternative
method of submitting electronic comments to EPA. Go directly to
Regulations.gov at http://www.regulations.gov,
then select
Environmental Protection Agency at the top of the page and use the go
button. The list of current EPA actions available for comment will be
listed. Please follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
The system is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not
know your identity, e-mail address, or other contact information unless
you provide it in the body of your comment.
iii. Disk or CD-ROM. You may submit comments on a disk or CD-ROM
that you mail to the mailing address identified in section 2, directly
below. These electronic submissions will be accepted in WordPerfect,
Word or ASCII file format. Avoid the use of special characters and any
form of encryption.
2. By Mail. Send your comments to: Sean Lakeman, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Please include the
text ``Public comment on proposed rulemaking FL-90'' in the subject
line on the first page of your comment.
3. By Hand Delivery or Courier. Deliver your comments to: Sean
Lakeman, Regulatory Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air,
Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, 12th floor, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. Such deliveries are only accepted during
the Regional Office's normal hours of operation. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 9 to 3:30,
excluding Federal holidays.
C. How Should I Submit CBI to the Agency?
Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI
electronically to EPA. You may claim information that you submit to EPA
as CBI by marking any part or all of that information as CBI (if you
submit CBI on disk or CD-ROM, mark the outside of the disk or CD-ROM as
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD-ROM the
specific information that is CBI). Information so marked will not be
disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes
any information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not
contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion
in the official public regional rulemaking file. If you submit the copy
that does not contain CBI on disk or CD-ROM, mark the outside of the
disk or CD-ROM clearly that it does not contain CBI. Information not
marked as CBI will be included in the public file and available for
public inspection without prior notice. If you have any questions about
CBI or the procedures for claiming CBI, please consult the person
identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
D. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
You may find the following suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as possible.
2. Describe any assumptions that you used.
3. Provide any technical information and/or data you used that
support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or costs, explain how you
arrived at your estimate.
5. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns.
6. Offer alternatives.
7. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline
identified.
8. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate
regional file/rulemaking identification number in the subject line on
the first page of your response. It would also be helpful if you
provided the name, date, and Federal Register citation related to your
comments.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175
(59 FR 22951, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various
[[Page 16172]]
levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132
(64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by May 28, 2004. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: March 17, 2004.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
? Part 52 of chapter I, title 40, Code of Federal Regulations, is amended
as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
? 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42.U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart K--Florida
? 2. Section 52.520 (e), is amended by revising the entry for ``Revision
to Maintenance Plan for the Tampa, Florida Area'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.520 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA--Approved Florida Non-Regulatory Provisions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA approval Federal Register
Provision State EPA date date notice Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Revision to Maintenance Plan for 12/20/02 3/29/04 [Insert citation 10 year update.
the Tampa, Florida Area. of publication].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 04-6824 Filed 3-26-04; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P