September 23, 2008 DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection |
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR CASE NO. 81-ERA-4
In the Matter of
GEORGE E. STEIN
v. WALLACE-SUPERIOR Respondent
George E. Stein filed a complaint alleging that he was discriminatorily discharged from him employment by the respondent because of activities to carry out the purposes of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended, in violation of Section 210 of the Act (92 Stat. 2951; 42 U.S.C. 5851). After a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge, the Judge issued a recommended decision in which he found that Stein had not shown any discrimination against him by his employer within the meaning of the Act and that no violation of Section 210 of the Act was committed. The Judge therefore recommended that the complaint be dismissed. On the basis of the entire record, it is my conclusion that the findings of fact and conclusions of law contained in the Administrative Law Judge's recommended decision, dated April 27, 1981, are supported by the evidence in the record, are in accordance with applicable law, and are proper, and I adopt such decision as my own. Accordingly, I conclude that the respondent did not violate Section 210 of the Act as alleged, and the complain is hereby dismissed.
Date at Washington, D.C.
RAYMOND J. DONOVAN
|
||||||||
|