[NIFL-ESL:9337] Accept English-Only Donation?

From: Jillian (zazee27@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Aug 29 2003 - 18:23:38 EDT


Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h7TMNc706369; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 18:23:38 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 18:23:38 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <20030829222050.4968.qmail@web40303.mail.yahoo.com>
Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov
Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov
Precedence: bulk
From: Jillian <zazee27@yahoo.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov>
Subject: [NIFL-ESL:9337] Accept English-Only Donation?
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Status: O
Content-Length: 4182
Lines: 98

It's invigorating to see a spirited discussion going
on again here.  Must be the tang of Autumn in the air
(though I am sad, as usual, to think of dreamy summer
ending).

Anyhow, the instigation for said discussion was a
moral dilemma:  should one accept money from a group
whose aims or stances one opposes, when accepting the
donation might well imply agreement with the group's
stance and aims?  There is only one morally defensible
response to such a dilemma: refusal.  However, one
would want, before rejecting any gift, to ascertain
precisely what the group stands for and advocates, to
be certain that it is, indeed, in moral opposition to
one's own outlook.

The discussion then proceeded to the wider question of
whether governments (at various levels) and other
social entities ought to promote or enable the use of
first languages by immigrants by offering
tax-supported items, such as government publications
and public education, in the languages most commonly
used by immigrants, or offer these only in English?

I think Joe was rather brave in expounding a position
which he must have known would be instantly rejected
by the majority of members here.  So far as I
understand his position, however, I seem to share it. 
Here are my concerns:

1.  Fairness.  No matter how effective some teaching
method, namely (here) bilingual education, may be
proven to be, it will never be FAIR, as it will not be
available to all who need it.  Immigrants living in a
location without qualified bilingual teachers, as well
as immigrants who speak a language for whom there are
no, or not enough, bilingual teachers, will not enjoy
whatever benefits come from this education and will
thus be at a disadvantage.  (If they are NOT going to
be at a disadvantage, then there is no point in
promoting and paying for the bilingual education
classes.) To say that all students cannot have
something does not, of course, mean it should not
exist. It does, however, mean that when one speaks of
the need for a program (such as bilingual ed) one must
remember that not all immigrants will be allowed to
participate.  Therefore such programs are not
democratic (favoring social equality) but on the
contrary, create a favored group--those immigrants,
chiefly Spanish-speaking, who are offered such
programs.  

2.  Since a great many of the Spanish-speaking
children in public schools are from families that are
here illegally, surely you can see why offering
special courses to this particular group strikes many
people as wrong.  

3.  Andres, with his usual astuteness, has provided us
a miniature history chapter on how immigrants have
assilmilated over the centuries without publicly
supported bilingual education--for better or worse. 
Immigrants who came to North America in the past did
not expect any linguistic concessions.  

4.  The majority of Americans, in my experience, react
to any dilemma as if it only occurred in the USA. 
However, other nations also have immigrants.  What do
they do in regards to language and education?  It is
true that throughout Europe you will see signs and
instructions in English, but this hardly results from
a particular nation's desire to assist its
English-speaking immigrants--it is because English has
become the universal means of communication.  I would
like to know
  a.  how various countries deal with public
communication--in what languages do they publish
driver's license manuals and census forms, etc. (not
for indiginous languages, but for immigrants)?
  b.  how various countries deal with bilingual
education.  There are many immigrants in Spain, where
I lived, but I never heard of bilingual education for
them.  However, it is quite likely that there might be
such a thing in northern European countries.  Does
anyone know?
  c.  Several states have passed laws allowing the
children of illegal immigrants to attend public
colleges and pay in-state tuition, if they have
graduated from an American high school.  Does anyone
know how other countries have dealt with this
situation?



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:16:20 EST