Return-Path: <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> Received: from literacy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by literacy.nifl.gov (8.10.2/8.10.2) with SMTP id h8OLH9V13993; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 17:17:09 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 17:17:09 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <BAY8-F90RTYBK1CRwFR00017118@hotmail.com> Errors-To: listowner@literacy.nifl.gov Reply-To: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Originator: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Sender: nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov Precedence: bulk From: "Kelly Castle" <kellyc636_6@hotmail.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> Subject: [NIFL-ESL:9504] Re: reading X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Status: O Content-Length: 1958 Lines: 70 The version being circulated in England claims that it came from Cambridge University. >From: "Jennifer Morrow" <jmorrow@jcplin.org> >Reply-To: nifl-esl@nifl.gov >To: Multiple recipients of list <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> >Subject: [NIFL-ESL:9500] Re: reading >Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:57:30 -0400 (EDT) > >I have gotten this exercise from four different sources so far. Where did >it come from? Who did this study? Where is it published? Any info would >be appreciated. >Jennifer > >-----Original Message----- >From: Dottie Shattuck [mailto:dottie@shattuck.net] >Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 3:31 PM >To: Multiple recipients of list >Subject: [NIFL-ESL:9485] Re: reading > > >This might be a fun exercise for upper level students & get their "take" on >whether it's true or not. __ >| \ >|__ / ottie dottie@shattuck.net >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Andres Muro" <AndresM@epcc.edu> >To: "Multiple recipients of list" <nifl-esl@literacy.nifl.gov> >Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 2:19 PM >Subject: [NIFL-ESL:9483] Re: reading > > >| This is cool. I am sure that the phonics advocates will not be able to >| read >this. >| >| Andres >| >| >>> dottie@shattuck.net 09/16/03 12:07PM >>> >| My daughter just sent this to me (forwarded to her). I thought some >| of you >would >| find it interesting. >| >| >| Aoccdrnig to rscheearch at an Elingsh uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in >| waht >oredr >| the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is that frist and >| lsat ltteer is at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and >| you can >sitll >| raed it wiuthoit a porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae we do not raed ervey >| lteterby it >slef >| but the wrod as a wlohe. pttrey azamnig Dottie ShattuckCharlotte, NC >| dottie@shattuck.net >| >| >| >| >| > > _________________________________________________________________ Stay in touch with absent friends - get MSN Messenger http://www.msn.co.uk/messenger
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Mar 11 2004 - 12:16:26 EST