Reviving Propargyl Bromide, A Chemical From the Past As
the January 1, 2001, deadline for the ban on methyl bromide looms nearer,
scientists from around the world intensify their search for viable
alternatives. Scott R. Yates is reviving interest in propargyl
bromide, a chemical used with chloropicrin and methyl bromide in Trizone,
a fumigant developed in the l960s. Yates is a soil scientist with the
Agricultural Research Service's U.S. Salinity Laboratory in
Riverside, California. He reported this research at the Annual
International Research Conference on Methyl Bromide Alternatives and
Emissions Reductions held in San Diego, November 35, 1997.
"The
increasing popularity of methyl bromide back in the '60s is one reason
that propargyl bromide was
never commercialized," Yates reported. "Since the compound is not
currently registered by the Environmental Protection Agency as a
pesticide, its
environmental behavior is essentially unknown." In tests, Yates and
colleagues at Riverside found that under typical
agricultural conditions, this chemical appears to pose no serious
environmental
risk. "It degrades quickly in the soil. This would help limit the amount
of the chemical that reaches groundwater or escapes into the atmosphere,"
he said. Since virtually no information exists on propargyl bromide,
Yates
concentrated research efforts on basic parameters such as solubility,
saturated
vapor density, and the ease with which the chemical moves through the soil
and
escapes into the atmosphere. This knowledge is critical before a decision
can
be made on whether the chemical should be used as a soil fumigant, Yates
said.
The data are also needed to design methods that minimize application rates
and
optimize control of target organisms. Yates compared the solubility
of propargyl bromide (3BP) with that of
methyl bromide and 1,3dichloropropene (1,3D), a potential methyl
bromide alternative. Solubility determines how quickly a chemical is
transported with water moving through porous substances. "At low
temperatures, the solubility of propargyl bromide increases
rapidly as temperatures rise, and then levels off. We found that this
chemical
dissolves into water at a rate comparable to methyl bromide," Yates said.
"And
under high leaching conditions, more propargyl will move with water than
1,3D,
since 1,3D is less soluble." According to Yates, since it is
important that a chemical move rapidly
through the soil, all agricultural fumigants generally have high saturated
vapor
density. The saturated vapor density gives an indication of the tendency
of a
chemical to prefer the vapor phase. In soil tests, 3BP degraded at a
rate similar to 1,3D, but much
faster than methyl bromide. In theory, Yates said, that part of a
chemical
applied to the soil which doesn't degrade will eventually enter
groundwater or
the atmosphere. Since 3BP degrades rapidly in soil, it will have lower
volatilization and is less likely to leach into groundwater than methyl
bromide. "Because of its easy movement through and low retention rate in
the
soil, 3BP should provide a fairly uniform fumigation," said Yates.
"Unless
the soil is covered with a barrier like an impermeable plastic film, most
agricultural fumigants will have a high rate of emission into the air. In
fact,
very high emission rates are reported for both methyl bromide and 1,3D in
field and lab tests.
"On one hand, high emission rates would reduce phytotoxicity and
possible groundwater contamination. But on the other hand, air emissions
could
produce undesirable health effects on people living or working near
treated
fields. Since propargyl bromide is highly degradable, little would reach
the
atmosphere or groundwater, compared to methyl bromide," he
reported. Propargyl bromide has characteristics which suggest that
it would be
environmentally safe and, therefore, warrants consideration as a methyl
bromide
alternative, Yates said. "However, further research is needed to
determine
its effectiveness in controlling pests and to further study its fate and
transport behavior under typical farming conditions."
[January 1998 Table of Contents] [Newsletter Issues
Listing] [Methyl
Bromide Home Page] [ARS Home
Page] [USDA Home
Page]
Last Updated: January 22, 1998
|
|
|