Botanical Extracts Reduce Populations of Soil
Pathogens
Principal Investigators: James C. Locke and John
H. Bowers, Research Plant Pathologists, Floral
and Nursery Plants Research Unit, U.S. National Arboretum, USDAARS,
Beltsville, MD 20705
There
are a number of soilborne fungal pathogens that are of concern in the
production of ornamental crops. To combat these pathogens, methyl bromide
has been used to fumigate soil prior to planting many of these crops. One
such example is Fusarium wilt of chrysanthemum, a widespread and
destructive disease of this major horticultural crop. Symptoms of this
disease may not become evident until near the time of flower production,
although infection takes place early in the crop cycle. The overall
goal of this research project is to develop and evaluate new or existing,
biologically based alternative control methods that can be integrated into
cropping systems which currently use methyl bromide. Environmentally safe
alternatives such as natural plant products, biological control agents,
and cultural methods are being investigated. Major soilborne
pathogens, Fusarium, Rhizoctonia, Verticillium, and
Phytophthora are being used in bioassays designed to determine
impact on soil populations and disease reduction in selected crops. This
report focuses on the effect of several formulated plant extracts in
reducing soil populations of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.
chrysanthemi (F.o.c.). Artificially infested soil samples
were treated with several rates of the botanical materials, incubated
under standardized conditions, and assayed periodically to determine
survival of the pathogen. The materials evaluated included the following
formulations: 70 percent clove oil, 90 percent neem oil, pepper extract
plus oil of mustard (4.94 percent capsaicin, 4.43 percent allyl
isothiocyanate), cassia tree extract (Abion M), and the standard
soil-drench fungicide Banrot 40W. Fusarium population
determinations were made at 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, and 21 days after soil
treatment. The natural product formulations were applied as 1, 5, and 10
percent aqueous emulsions at 5 ml per 150 cubic centimeters of
soil. Neither Banrot nor 1 percent applications of any of the
botanical extracts reduced the population of F.o.c. compared to the
untreated control. However, the 5 and 10 percent applications of the
botanical extracts resulted in significant differences in the surviving
F.o.c. populations at each assay date. Treatment with the neem oil
material actually resulted in increased F.o.c. populations. Soil
populations of F.o.c. were lowest after 3 to 7 days of incubation with the
pepper extract. In addition, populations of other soil microbes were also
reduced to the greatest degree when treated with the pepper extract. The
F.o.c. populations did rebound over time, showing a steady increase
beginning 7 days after treatment. This increase could be the result of
either breakdown of the pepper extract in soil or the lack of microbial
competition which allows any surviving F.o.c. propagules to rapidly
recolonize the treated soil. This may also occur with the clove oil and
cassia extract but to a lesser extent. Further research will address
these population dynamics questions. The ability of these natural
products to reduce soil populations of these pathogens coupled with their
environmentally friendly composition makes these materials attractive
candidates for use in biologically based management strategies. In the
highly intense management of high value ornamental crops, these materials
may be part of the answer to the quest for an alternative to methyl
bromide fumigation. However, to fully develop an alternative cultural
practice, these materials may need to be integrated with other practices
such as the use of beneficial or biocontrol agents. Additional
research needs to be completed to scale-up these findings to actual
production systems. Application rates and methods, pre-plant incubation
periods, tolerance of various crop plants, and impact on soil microbial
systems are being addressed. Whether this technology could be adapted for
use with agronomic crops remains to be determined.
[January 1998 Table of Contents] [Newsletter Issues
Listing] [Methyl
Bromide Home Page] [ARS Home
Page] [USDA Home
Page]
Last Updated: January 22, 1998
|
|
|