[Accessibility Information]
Welcome Current Issue Index How to Subscribe Archives
Monthly Labor Review Online

Related BLS programs | Related articles

EXCERPT

August 1997, Vol. 120, No. 8

Coal mining in the U.S. West: price and employment trends

David McDermott


Coal produced in the Western1 States has increased in price relative to coal from other regions of the Nation. At the same time, employment in coal mining has been virtually unchanged in the Western States, while it has declined in most other parts of the country. Appalachia is still the country’s largest coal producer and employer, but a clear westward shift of coal mining is underway. Much of both the increased price for western coal and the stability of employment in western coal mining results from the low sulfur content of the area’s coal, which has increased its desirability, environmentally speaking.

Legislative initiatives, including the New Source Performance Standards of 19712 and the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,3 created incentives for electric utilities to burn low-sulfur coal. The Nation’s largest source of such coal is in the West: the Powder River Basin of Wyoming.4 While other factors (relative freight costs, labor costs, production costs, regional variation in demand for electricity, competing energy sources) undoubtedly contribute to both the increase in prices received by western coal mines and the stability of mining employment in some Western States, much of the impact can be attributed to the demand for coal with low sulfur content.


This excerpt is from an article published in the August 1997 issue of the Monthly Labor Review. The full text of the article is available in Adobe Acrobat's Portable Document Format (PDF). See How to view a PDF file for more information.

ArrowRead abstract   ArrowDownload full text in PDF (93K)


Footnotes
1 Producer Price Index (PPI) data for coal are published by Bureau of Mines (BOM) districts. Coalbeds do not always respect State boundaries, so some districts cross State lines. The publication categories for PPI’s and the approximate State equivalents are as follows: West (BOM 16–23)—Colorado, New Mexico, Arizona, California, Idaho, Wyoming, Utah, North Dakota, South Dakota, Montana, Alaska, Oregon, Washington; Midwest (BOM 9–12, 14, 15)—Oklahoma, Texas, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri; South Appalachia (BOM 7, 8, 13)—Virginia, West Virginia, Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, North Carolina; North Appalachia (BOM 1–6)—Maryland, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan.

2 Bruce Ackerman and William Hassler, Clean Coal/Dirty Air (New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 1981).

3 US Coal Reserves: An Update by Heat and Sulfur Content (U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, 1993).

4 The Changing Structure of the US Coal Industry (U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, 1993), pp. 27–28.


Related BLS programs
Producer Price Indexes
State and Area Current Employment Statistics

Related Monthly Labor Review articles
No other articles related to this topic currently are available through Monthly Labor Review Online. Search our index for other articles of potential interest.

Within Monthly Labor Review Online:
Welcome | Current Issue | Index | Subscribe | Archives

Exit Monthly Labor Review Online:
BLS Home | Publications & Research Papers