BJS home page
Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2004 - Statistical Tables
Previous
Next
Related pages:
Courts and sentencing --
· Pretrial release & detention
· Criminal case processing
· Criminal sentencing
|
Felony Defendants in Large Urban Counties, 2004 - Statistical Tables
Download
spreadsheet version (.csv file)
Appendix table E. Felony defendants released before or detained until case disposition, by SCPS jurisdiction, 2004
| County (State) |
Percent of felony defendants |
|
| |
| |
Released before case disposition |
|
Detained until
case disposition |
|
| Total |
Financial release |
|
Nonfinancial release |
| |
|
|
| Total financial |
Surety bond |
Deposit bond |
Full cash bond |
Property bond |
Total non-financial |
Recognizance |
Conditional |
Unsecured bond |
Total |
Held on bail |
Denied bail |
| |
| Total |
58 |
% |
32 |
% |
23 |
% |
5 |
% |
1 |
% |
1 |
% |
|
26 |
% |
15 |
% |
9 |
% |
2 |
% |
|
42 |
% |
36 |
% |
7 |
% |
| Jefferson (AL) |
82 |
% |
45 |
% |
18 |
% |
0 |
% |
-- |
% |
27 |
% |
|
37 |
% |
0 |
% |
23 |
% |
15 |
% |
|
18 |
% |
18 |
% |
-- |
% |
| Maricopa (AZ) |
63 |
|
15 |
|
11 |
|
3 |
|
2 |
|
0 |
|
|
48 |
|
19 |
|
29 |
|
0 |
|
|
37 |
|
11 |
|
26 |
|
| Pima (AZ) |
65 |
|
15 |
|
11 |
|
0 |
|
5 |
|
-- |
|
|
49 |
|
33 |
|
16 |
|
0 |
|
|
35 |
|
35 |
|
0 |
|
| Alameda (CA) |
40 |
|
29 |
|
28 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
|
11 |
|
11 |
|
-- |
|
0 |
|
|
60 |
|
50 |
|
10 |
|
| Contra Costa (CA) |
37 |
|
21 |
|
20 |
|
0 |
|
-- |
|
0 |
|
|
17 |
|
16 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
|
63 |
|
60 |
|
3 |
|
| Los Angeles (CA) |
31 |
|
18 |
|
18 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
14 |
|
14 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
69 |
|
68 |
|
1 |
|
| Orange (CA) |
33 |
|
18 |
|
17 |
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
-- |
|
|
15 |
|
15 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
|
67 |
|
66 |
|
1 |
|
| Riverside (CA) |
37 |
|
27 |
|
27 |
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
|
10 |
|
10 |
|
-- |
|
0 |
|
|
63 |
|
61 |
|
3 |
|
| San Bernardino (CA) |
43 |
% |
17 |
% |
17 |
% |
0 |
% |
0 |
% |
0 |
% |
|
26 |
% |
24 |
% |
2 |
% |
0 |
% |
|
57 |
% |
55 |
% |
2 |
% |
| San Diego (CA) |
41 |
|
25 |
|
25 |
|
0 |
|
-- |
|
-- |
|
|
16 |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
-- |
|
|
59 |
|
21 |
|
38 |
|
| San Mateo (CA) |
34 |
|
28 |
|
27 |
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
|
6 |
|
3 |
|
3 |
|
0 |
|
|
66 |
|
39 |
|
27 |
|
| Santa Clara (CA) |
49 |
|
32 |
|
32 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
17 |
|
6 |
|
11 |
|
0 |
|
|
51 |
|
29 |
|
22 |
|
| Broward (FL) |
77 |
|
66 |
|
64 |
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
0 |
|
|
11 |
|
8 |
|
3 |
|
0 |
|
|
23 |
|
18 |
|
5 |
|
| Miami-Dade (FL) |
65 |
|
35 |
|
34 |
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
... |
|
|
30 |
|
5 |
|
26 |
|
0 |
|
|
35 |
|
30 |
|
5 |
|
| Palm Beach (FL) |
67 |
|
37 |
|
32 |
|
0 |
|
5 |
|
0 |
|
|
30 |
|
4 |
|
26 |
|
0 |
|
|
33 |
|
24 |
|
9 |
|
| Pinellas (FL) |
61 |
|
41 |
|
38 |
|
0 |
|
3 |
|
0 |
|
|
20 |
|
14 |
|
6 |
|
-- |
|
|
39 |
|
37 |
|
2 |
|
| Fulton (GA) |
63 |
% |
25 |
% |
23 |
% |
0 |
% |
-- |
% |
2 |
% |
|
38 |
% |
13 |
% |
22 |
% |
3 |
% |
|
37 |
% |
24 |
% |
14 |
% |
| Honolulu (HI) |
57 |
|
30 |
|
30 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
27 |
|
2 |
|
25 |
|
0 |
|
|
43 |
|
43 |
|
0 |
|
| Cook (IL) |
45 |
|
21 |
|
0 |
|
21 |
|
-- |
|
0 |
|
|
24 |
|
-- |
|
7 |
|
17 |
|
|
55 |
|
54 |
|
-- |
|
| Marion (IN) |
73 |
|
22 |
|
20 |
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
51 |
|
44 |
|
8 |
|
0 |
|
|
27 |
|
25 |
|
2 |
|
| Baltimore (MD) |
75 |
|
49 |
|
45 |
|
0 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
27 |
|
23 |
|
2 |
|
2 |
|
|
25 |
|
14 |
|
10 |
|
| Montgomery (MD) |
70 |
|
28 |
|
16 |
|
8 |
|
0 |
|
4 |
|
|
42 |
|
15 |
|
21 |
|
6 |
|
|
30 |
|
25 |
|
6 |
|
| Wayne (MI) |
58 |
|
23 |
|
0 |
|
23 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
35 |
|
0 |
|
20 |
|
15 |
|
|
42 |
|
41 |
|
1 |
|
| Essex (NJ) |
83 |
|
26 |
|
17 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
|
0 |
|
|
57 |
|
57 |
|
-- |
|
0 |
|
|
17 |
|
15 |
|
1 |
|
| Bronx (NY) |
72 |
% |
23 |
% |
… |
% |
… |
% |
… |
% |
… |
% |
|
49 |
% |
… |
% |
… |
% |
… |
% |
|
28 |
% |
23 |
% |
5 |
% |
| Kings (NY) |
82 |
|
25 |
|
… |
|
… |
|
… |
|
… |
|
|
57 |
|
… |
|
… |
|
… |
|
|
18 |
|
17 |
|
1 |
|
| Nassau (NY) |
62 |
|
44 |
|
… |
|
… |
|
… |
|
… |
|
|
18 |
|
… |
|
… |
|
… |
|
|
38 |
|
0 |
|
38 |
|
| Queens (NY) |
74 |
|
31 |
|
… |
|
… |
|
… |
|
… |
|
|
43 |
|
… |
|
… |
|
… |
|
|
26 |
|
22 |
|
4 |
|
| Westchester (NY) |
… |
|
… |
|
… |
|
… |
|
… |
|
… |
|
|
… |
|
… |
|
… |
|
… |
|
|
… |
|
… |
|
… |
|
| Franklin (OH) |
71 |
|
53 |
|
41 |
|
10 |
|
2 |
|
0 |
|
|
18 |
|
2 |
|
8 |
|
8 |
|
|
29 |
|
29 |
|
1 |
|
| Montgomery (PA) |
76 |
|
39 |
|
27 |
|
11 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
37 |
|
7 |
|
0 |
|
30 |
|
|
25 |
|
25 |
|
0 |
|
| Philadelphia (PA) |
79 |
|
63 |
|
0 |
|
63 |
|
0 |
|
-- |
|
|
16 |
|
5 |
|
11 |
|
1 |
|
|
22 |
|
22 |
|
0 |
|
| Shelby (TN) |
59 |
% |
47 |
% |
47 |
% |
0 |
% |
0 |
% |
0 |
% |
|
12 |
% |
3 |
% |
9 |
% |
-- |
% |
|
41 |
% |
41 |
% |
0 |
% |
| Dallas (TX) |
59 |
|
58 |
|
58 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
0 |
|
|
1 |
|
-- |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
|
41 |
|
40 |
|
-- |
|
| El Paso (TX) |
69 |
|
59 |
|
58 |
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
|
10 |
|
-- |
|
9 |
|
-- |
|
|
31 |
|
27 |
|
4 |
|
| Harris (TX) |
46 |
|
46 |
|
44 |
|
0 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
|
-- |
|
0 |
|
-- |
|
0 |
|
|
54 |
|
39 |
|
15 |
|
| Tarrant (TX) |
65 |
|
63 |
|
62 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
|
2 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
-- |
|
|
35 |
|
26 |
|
9 |
|
| Travis (TX) |
41 |
|
21 |
|
20 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
0 |
|
|
20 |
|
6 |
|
14 |
|
1 |
|
|
59 |
|
53 |
|
6 |
|
| Salt Lake (UT) |
67 |
|
19 |
|
19 |
|
0 |
|
-- |
|
0 |
|
|
48 |
|
13 |
|
35 |
|
0 |
|
|
33 |
|
17 |
|
16 |
|
| Fairfax (VA) |
91 |
|
55 |
|
46 |
|
0 |
|
4 |
|
5 |
|
|
36 |
|
1 |
|
7 |
|
29 |
|
|
9 |
|
5 |
|
4 |
|
| |
--Less than 0.5%.
...Data were not available for these jurisdictions. |
| |
Source: State Court Processing Statistics (SCPS)
See also Methodology. |
