Home About ATSDR Press Room A-Z Index Glossary Employment Training Contact Us CDC  
ATSDR/DHHS Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry Department of Health and Human Services ATSDR en Español

Search:

Toxic Substances and Health
 
Report Contents
 
Charge to the Panel
Panel Members
 
Fate & Biomonitoring
 
Sampling Methodologies
Health Endpoints
Susceptible Populations
Exposure Evaluation
Biomonitoring
 
Correlation of Data
 
Risk Management
 
Relocation Criteria
 
Reference Doses
 
Decontamination
 
Recommendations
 
Clinical Evaluation
 
Appropriate Triggers
Health Status
Environmental Medicine
 
Evaluation Protocol
 
Standardizing Lab Data
Treatment
Neurobehavioral Effects
Acute Poisoning
Suggested Evaluation
 
Overarching Issues
 
Recommendations
Field Survey
7-day Study
Dermal Absorption
Subchronic Toxicity
Pilot Study
Cohort Study
 
Selected References
 
Risk Communication
 
Workgroup
Recommendations
Operating Procedures
Management & Planning
Limitations of Strategies
Planning Steps
Identifying Populations
Preventing Exposures
Research Needs
Conclusions
 
Risk Documents
 
Cancer Policy
Risk Assessment
Communication Primer
Evaluation Primer
Psychologial Responses
 
ATSDR Resources
 
Case Studies (CSEM)
Exposure Pathways
GATHER (GIS)
HazDat Database
Health Assessments
Health Statements
Interaction Profiles
Interactive Learning
Managing Incidents
Medical Guidelines
Minimal Risk Levels
Priority List
ToxFAQs™
ToxFAQs™ CABS
Toxicological Profiles
Toxicology Curriculum
 
External Resources
 
CDC
eLCOSH
EPA
Healthfinder®
Medline Plus
NCEH
NIEHS
NIOSH
OSHA
 

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
Methyl Parathion Expert Panel Report
Health Education and Risk Communication Strategies


Conclusions

In less than 2 days, it is impossible for us to consider many other aspects of communication regarding MP exposure. However, we hope the above provides further fodder for agency thinking and action. The following are our key :

  1. Plan for proactive communication.
  2. Do not design materials without knowing audience concerns firsthand.
  3. Integrate planning for risk management and communication.
  4. Involve community organizations and affected individuals from the beginning.
  5. Planning needs to be targeted to three audiences: those identified as affected, those who are exposed but do not yet know it, and those who might expose themselves to contamination in the future.
  6. To accomplish the above will require research.
  7. The agencies will need to conduct follow-up forums and develop institutional coordination to plan communication.
  8. Consult communication specialists before implementing a communication strategy.
  9. Integrate communication efforts within the technical assessment of the risk management program.
  10. Pretest materials developed to the extent possible.

Top of Page