Search Options | ||||
Index | Site Map | FAQ | Facility Info | Reading Rm | New | Help | Glossary | Contact Us |
December 14, 2001 Dr. William D. Travers
Dear Dr. Travers: During the 488th meeting of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, December 5-7, 2001, we reviewed the latest revision to Nuclear Energy Institute document, "Steam Generator Program Guidelines" (NEI 97-06), and the associated Steam Generator Program Generic License Change Package. Our Materials and Metallurgy Subcommittee reviewed these documents on November 29, 2001. During our reviews, we had the benefit of discussions with representatives of the staff and NEI. We also had the benefit of the documents referenced. Conclusions
Background In the early 1990s, the regulations required licensees to repair steam generator tubes having flaws deeper than 40 percent through-wall. Since the nondestructive examination (NDE) methods were unable to characterize the dimensions of a crack with sufficient accuracy and reproducibility, licensees repaired tubes with identified cracks. In 1995, the staff issued Generic Letter 95-05, which, in certain specific situations, allowed steam generator tubes with cracks to remain in service, in part, on the basis of data from voltage-based NDE methodologies. Since that time, the staff and NEI have worked to develop a regulatory framework to ensure steam generator tube integrity. The staff considered developing a rule, but it failed to pass the regulatory analysis test. In 1997, affected licensees committed to follow NEI 97-06 that defined performance criteria for structural integrity and leakage under accident and normal operating conditions. These criteria were implemented by tube integrity assessment guidelines defined in a series of evolving Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) reports. In addition, NEI proposed an industry Steam Generator Program Generic License Change Package, which provided templates for licensees to amend plant-specific technical specifications. The staff and NEI are now in general agreement concerning the content of NEI 97-06 and the degree of regulatory control offered by the Generic License Change Package. Of particular note is the fact that the program is adaptable and that the supporting technology is evolving. Investigations sponsored by the industry and the NRC staff are ongoing. Discussion Our discussions with the staff and NEI addressed wide-ranging technical issues, including the following:
An unresolved technical issue is the appropriate length of inspection intervals. The NEI position on inspection intervals is contained in draft revision 6 of the EPRI document, "PWR Steam Generator Examination Guidelines," in which NEI proposes that the intervals for Alloy 600TT and 690TT tubing be extended beyond the interval permitted by current regulations. Although the domestic operating experience justifies increasing the inspection intervals for these alloys, there have been reported incidents of cracking of Alloy 600TT tubes in foreign plants. These identified cracks have been discounted by industry due to different construction and operating conditions. However, there were no controlled data presented to explain the validity of this position and whether the differences in stress, environment, or material conditions, which govern cracking susceptibility, are sufficient to ensure an adequate resistance in domestic plants. There is a need to review the relevant global operating and laboratory databases. The steam generator management program was originally intended to be primarily performance based. If the Generic License Change Package is approved, a greater degree of performance-based capability will have been achieved. Full implementation of a performance-based approach for determining plant-specific inspection intervals will depend on evolving developments in inspection techniques, and quantification of the stochastic aspects of stress corrosion cracking. Dr. William J. Shack did not participate in the Committee's deliberations regarding this matter.
References
|