Search Options | ||||
Index | Site Map | FAQ | Facility Info | Reading Rm | New | Help | Glossary | Contact Us |
September 17, 1999
MEMORANDUM TO: | William D. Travers Executive Director for Operations |
FROM: | Annette Vietti-Cook, Secretary /s/ |
SUBJECT: | STAFF REQUIREMENTS - SECY-99-200 - FEDERAL REGISTER NOTICE RESPONDING TO PUBLIC COMMENTS RECEIVED ON AN EMERGENCY FINAL RULE FOR FISSILE MATERIAL SHIPMENTS |
The Commission has approved the proposed Federal Register notice (FRN) subject to the following comments and the changes noted in the attachment.
The staff should take the following actions to address the potentially significant unintended economic impact on the shipment of fissile material without special moderators (the unintended impact issue) that was imposed by the emergency rule :
Revise the FRN to indicate that the unintended impact issue will be addressed as part of the rulemaking to make Part 71 compatible with IAEA transportation standards.
Revise the FRN to note the NRC need for data to document the unintended impact of the emergency rule. This approach will place the industry on notice that the data is needed.
(EDO) | (SECY Suspense (items 1.a & 1.b): 10/22/99) |
Prepare an overall rulemaking plan for Part 71 that addresses the need for changes to make NRC regulations compatible with IAEA transportation standards and also addresses the unintended impacts of the emergency rule. This should be completed by May 31, 2000. If the rulemaking activities associated with IAEA compatibility are delayed, the staff should prepare a separate plan that addresses the unintended economic impacts of the emergency rule. This should also be completed by May 31, 2000.
If, based on further analysis of the unintended economic impact of the emergency rule, the staff concludes that those impacts are far less than characterized in SECY 99-200, the staff should inform the Commission, with some description of the supporting basis, that rulemaking is not warranted, in lieu of preparing a rulemaking plan for this issue.
On page 16 of the FRN, a commenter stated that the wording of the rule is not clear with respect to application of a limit to deuterium. The staff response clarifies the intent of the rule but does not state whether staff intends to amend the existing rule language to remove the ambiguity. The response should be modified to indicate that this will be done at the time the corrective amendment is proposed.
(EDO) | (SECY Suspense (items 1.c, 1.d, & 2): 5/31/00) |
Attachment: | Editorial Changes to the FRN in SECY-99-200 |
cc: | Chairman Dicus Commissioner Diaz Commissioner McGaffigan Commissioner Merrifield OGC CIO CFO OCA OIG OPA Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLBP (via E-Mail) PDR DCS |