skip navigation links 
 
 Search Options 
Index | Site Map | FAQ | Facility Info | Reading Rm | New | Help | Glossary | Contact Us blue spacer  
secondary page banner Return to NRC Home Page

Morning Report for September 20, 1999

                       Headquarters Daily Report

                         SEPTEMBER 20, 1999

***************************************************************************
                    REPORT             NEGATIVE            NO INPUT
                    ATTACHED           INPUT RECEIVED      RECEIVED

HEADQUARTERS        X                                      
REGION I                               X                   
REGION II                              X                   
REGION III                             X                   
REGION IV                              X                   
PRIORITY ATTENTION REQUIRED  MORNING REPORT - HEADQUARTERS SEP. 20, 1999

MR Number: H-99-0086

                           NRR DAILY REPORT ITEM
                            SIGNIFICANT EVENTS



Subject: Scram on Loss of Condenser Vacuum
         and Recovery with Complications

On August 24, 1999, the NRR Events Assessment, Generic Communications and
Non-Power Reactors Branch classified this event as a Significant Event   
for the NRC Performance Indicator Program. The basis for this            
classification is the number of complications that resulted and produced 
unnecessary burdens on licensee personnel.                               
                                                                         
On June 15, 1999, the Hatch licensee manually scrammed Unit 2 in         
anticipation of receiving an automatic scram signal on a turbine trip due
to loss of condenser vacuum (Licensee Event Report 50-366/99-06). Several
factors complicated recovery from the event: (1) failure of automatic    
realignment of two Unit 2 4160-volt buses because a transfer blocking    
relay was out of calibration; (2) an arcing ground fault on a 600-volt   
bus fed from Unit 1, tripping several safety-related Unit 1 600-volt     
circuit breakers, which actuated some Unit 1 engineered safeguards       
features but did not otherwise interfere with Unit 1 operation; (3) loss 
of Unit 2 main feedwater pumps requiring use of the Unit 2 reactor core  
isolation cooling system to maintain reactor level; (4) failure of a Unit
2 inboard main steam isolation valve to close due to an alternating      
current solenoid valve being stuck in the energized position; and (5) a  
leak in the Unit 2 residual heat removal service water system because of 
a broken 3/4-inch vent line. The licensee complied with the required     
limiting condition for operation 3.6.2.1 and brought Unit 2 to cold      
shutdown about 36 hours after the manual scram.                          
                                                                         
The NRC Region II Office conducted a special inspection of the           
circumstances of this event (NRC Special Team Inspection Report          
50-321(366)/99-10). The inspectors concluded that the licensee missed two
opportunities to improve early detection of loss of condenser vacuum     
following similar events at this unit in 1995 and 1997.                  
                                                                         
The licensee took several corrective actions for this event, adding level
instruments in the circulating water pump pits, promulgating an operating
order on condenser operating parameters, repairing the grounded          
conductor, replacing the 4160-volt fast transfer blocking relay,         
shortening the broken vent line, and instituting the checking of all MSIV
solenoid valves for audible buzzing, an indication of undesirable        
presence of debris.                                                      
                                                                         
The risk assessment for this event is low in spite of the number of      
complications, which were generally related to balance of plant          
equipment. All emergency core cooling systems were operable and the scope
of the event remained within plant design parameters. A calculation using
the conservative simplified plant analysis risk model indicated that the 
conditional core damage probability is less than 1E-6.                   
                                                                         
A review of 1998-1999 event notifications using the search string        

HEADQUARTERS      MORNING REPORT     PAGE  2          SEP. 20, 1999
MR Number: H-99-0086 (cont.)

"vacuum" disclosed ten reports with similar initiating conditions but    
with no similar complications. Consequently, the Hatch 2 event appears to
be an isolated occurrence.                                               
                                                                         
The susceptibility to electrical noise of breaker trip devices, similar  
to ones that tripped some of the breakers in this event, is addressed in 
Information Notices 96-62 and 93-75. On 18 Aug 99, this event was briefed
to senior NRC management because of the number of factors that were      
confusing to licensee operators.                                         
                                                                         
Contact:  C. Vernon Hodge, NRR                                           
          301-415-1861                                                   
          Email:                                            
_