|
|
Safety and Effectiveness of Granulocyte Transfusions in Resolving Infection in People With Neutropenia (The RING Study)
Basic Trial Information Trial Description Summary Further Trial Information Eligibility Criteria Trial Contact Information
Basic Trial Information
|
Phase
|
|
|
|
Type
|
|
|
|
Status
|
|
|
|
Age
|
|
|
|
Sponsor
|
|
|
|
Protocol IDs
|
|
|
|
Phase III
|
|
|
|
Supportive care
|
|
|
|
Active
|
|
|
|
Not specified
|
|
|
|
NHLBI
|
|
|
|
557 U01 HL072305-01, HL072268, HL072291, HL072196, HL072248, HL072191, HL072305, HL072028, HL072072, HL072355, HL072283, HL072346, HL072331, HL072290, NCT00627393
|
|
|
Trial Description
Summary Neutropenia, a condition characterized by an abnormally low number of infection-fighting white blood cells called neutrophils, commonly develops in people who have undergone chemotherapy or hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation. The severely reduced immunity of those with neutropenia can put them at risk of entry of life-threatening infections, making the implementation of treatments that increase white blood cell numbers important. Several studies have shown that the transfusion of donor granulocytes, a type of white blood cell that includes neutrophils, is effective in promoting the recovery of adequate numbers of granulocytes. However, granulocyte transfusions can cause side effects, and it is not known whether the success of the therapy outweighs the health risks of the side effects. This study will evaluate the safety and effectiveness of granulocyte transfusions in treating people with a bacterial or fungal infection during neutropenia. Further Study Information Thousands of people each year are hospitalized for neutropenia, which continues to cause substantial morbidity and mortality for those affected. Neutropenia is primarily caused by chemotherapy and various other cancer treatments, such as radiation therapy, biotherapy, and HSC transplantation. Signs and symptoms of neutropenia may include high fever, chills, sore throat, and diarrhea. In neutropenia, the number of neutrophils, a type of granulocyte, is greatly reduced, weakening the body's immune system and increasing the risk of infection. Therefore, a method to provide adequate numbers of functional granulocytes to people with neutropenia could be of greatest benefit for recovery. Administration of a combination of two drugs, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and dexamethasone, has been show to stimulate the body to produce a large number of granulocytes. Granulocyte transfusions obtained from donors who have received these two drugs may help people with low white blood cell counts fight infections until their own white blood cell counts recover. However, it is not clear whether the benefits of granulocyte transfusions outweigh the risks of side effects. This study will compare the safety and effectiveness of granulocyte transfusions with standard antimicrobial therapy versus the safety and effectiveness of standard antimicrobial therapy alone in increasing granulocyte numbers and in improving survival rates in people with bacterial or fungal infection during neutropenia. Participation in the research portion of this study will last about 3 months. All participants who were not previously receiving treatment with standard antimicrobial therapy will begin therapy immediately upon study entry. Participants will then be assigned randomly to receive either granulocyte transfusion plus continued antimicrobial therapy or continued antimicrobial therapy alone. All participants will be monitored for a maximum of 42 days, during which they will provide information on medical history and ongoing status of antimicrobial therapy. Daily blood samples to measure white blood cell count will be obtained from participants until samples show that participants are making their own granulocytes. Samples will then be collected weekly until Day 42. There may be additional blood draws depending on the type of infection present in participants. Granulocyte transfusions will be given daily during the 42-day treatment period, depending on granulocyte donor availability. Blood counts will be checked immediately before and after each transfusion to measure granulocyte levels. Transfusions will be stopped if participants start making their own granulocytes, experience serious side effects, or show a reduction in infection. At Month 3 after study entry, follow-up information will be collected about all participants' health status through reviewing their medical records and contacting their physicians. Participation for granulocyte donors will last 1 week from the time of donation. Participants may provide more than one granulocyte donation, but no more than one donation every 3 days and eight donations each year. Twelve hours before each donation, participants will be injected with Neupogen, which contains G-CSF, and they will take one dose of dexamethasone by mouth. Participants will then undergo a blood draw, followed by a procedure using an apheresis machine for granulocyte collection. The procedure will last 3 to 4 hours and will involve the drawing of blood from each arm, the separation of granulocytes from the red blood cells and plasma in the machine, and the return of the red blood cells and plasma to the participants. Eligibility Criteria Inclusion Criteria: - Undergone dose-intensive chemotherapy or HSC transplantation within 60 days before study entry
- Diagnosis of neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count less than 500 cells/mm3) and is expected to remain neutropenic for at least 5 days after study entry
- Must have one of the following: fungemia, bacteremia, invasive tissue bacterial infection, proven invasive tissue fungal infection, or probable invasive tissue fungal infection (Note: patients with criteria meeting only the definition for a possible invasive fungal infection are not eligible to participate)
Exclusion Criteria: - Unlikely to survive 5 days
- Previously enrolled in this study
Trial Contact Information
Trial Lead Organizations/Sponsors National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Susan F. Assmann, PhD | | Principal Investigator |
Jan McFarland, MD | | Principal Investigator |
Eliot C. Williams | | Principal Investigator |
Ellis Neufeld, MD | | Principal Investigator |
James B. Bussel | | Principal Investigator |
Christopher Hillyer, MD | | Principal Investigator |
Paul M. Ness | | Principal Investigator |
Sherrill Slichter | | Principal Investigator |
Thomas Price, MD | | Study Chair |
Ronald Strauss, MD | | Principal Investigator |
Jeffrey McCullough, MD | | Principal Investigator |
Mark Brecher, MD | | Principal Investigator |
James George, MD | | Principal Investigator |
Barbara Konkle, MD | | Principal Investigator |
Catherine Manno, MD | | Principal Investigator |
Darrell Triulzi, MD | | Principal Investigator |
Trial Sites
|
|
|
|
U.S.A. |
|
Minnesota |
|
|
Minneapolis |
|
| | | | | | | | Masonic Cancer Center at University of Minnesota |
| | Mark Reding, MD |
Ph: 612-624-0123 |
|
Email:
redin002@umn.edu |
| | Jeffrey McCullough, MD | Principal Investigator |
| | Mark Reding, MD | Sub-Investigator |
|
Oklahoma |
|
|
Oklahoma City |
|
| | | Oklahoma University Cancer Institute |
| | Jennifer Holter, MD |
Ph: 405-271-4222 |
|
Email:
jennifer-holter@ouhsc.edu |
| | James George, MD | Principal Investigator |
| | Jennifer Holter, MD | Sub-Investigator |
|
Wisconsin |
|
|
Madison |
|
| | | University of Wisconsin Paul P. Carbone Comprehensive Cancer Center |
| | Eliot Williams, MD |
Ph: 608-262-5327 |
|
Email:
williams@medicine.wisc.edu |
| | Eliot C. Williams | Principal Investigator |
|
|
Milwaukee |
|
| | Froedtert Hospital and Medical College of Wisconsin |
| | Michael Lankiewicz, MD |
Ph: 414-937-6416 |
|
Email:
michael.lankiewicz@bcw.edu |
| | Jan McFarland, MD | Principal Investigator |
| | Michael Lankiewicz, MD | Sub-Investigator |
|
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.
NLM Identifer NCT00627393 Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on September 15, 2008 Note: Information about this trial is from the ClinicalTrials.gov database. The versions designated for health professionals and patients contain
the same text. Minor
changes may be made to the ClinicalTrials.gov record to standardize the names of study sponsors, sites, and
contacts. Cancer.gov only lists sites that are recruiting patients for active trials, whereas ClinicalTrials.gov lists all sites for all trials. Questions and comments regarding the presented information should
be directed to ClinicalTrials.gov. Back to Top |
|