|
From Data to Action: Tobacco |
|
Using Surveillance To Promote Public Health
Examples from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS)
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PUBLICATION YEAR 2002
Tobacco
Cigarette smoking during pregnancy contributes to a number of adverse
birth outcomes, including spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, fetal death, low
birth weight, prematurity, and intrauterine growth retardation. Smoking is
the most important known preventable risk factor for low birth weight, a
leading cause of fetal and neonatal deaths.10-12 Postpartum
exposure to environmental tobacco smoke also puts infants at increased risk
for Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) and several other health problems,
including lower respiratory infection, ear infection, and asthma.13
Alabama
Alabama PRAMS data demonstrated higher smoking rates among pregnant women
receiving Medicaid than among pregnant women not receiving Medicaid. In
1996, the Alabama Department of Public Health, in collaboration with the
University of Alabama, Birmingham, used these data to win $2.5 million as
part of a grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. This
money was used for a program designed to stop or reduce smoking among
pregnant women who receive prenatal care in county health department clinics
in eight counties. The intervention, SCRIPT (Smoking Cessation. Reduction in
Pregnancy Trial), was a 5-year project consisting of a patient education
program using a self-help guide and video, with assistance provided by
trained staff members. Initial results from the intervention were published
in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology in 2000.14 The
authors reported that SCRIPT participants were more than twice as likely to
quit smoking as members of the control group. Because SCRIPT has been shown
to be effective, prenatal care and maternity care staff in the Alabama
Department of Public Health are being trained using SCRIPT methods as part
of a “best practice” for caring for pregnant smokers in Alabama. The free
training, which is carried out throughout the state, began in October 2001
and will continue for 2 years.
The
success of the SCRIPT program in Alabama resulted in the formation of the
Alabama Tobacco Free Families (ATOFF) Program. The Alabama Department of
Public Health and the University of Alabama, Birmingham, received $4.4
million from the National Cancer Institute to further reduce smoking in the
eight SCRIPT counties by expanding the focus to include all women of
childbearing age and their male partners. The intervention is aimed at
increasing public awareness and knowledge of tobacco risks to the mother,
fetus, and infant by targeting messages through community organizations
(schools, churches, and work sites), professional organizations (health care
organizations and providers), and mass media outlets. PRAMS data are being
used to monitor smoking rates among pregnant women in the state. The data
also serve as a resource to organizations participating in the intervention.
Florida
A
governor’s task force in Florida used PRAMS data in the 1997 Florida
lawsuit against the tobacco companies. The purpose of the lawsuit was to
recover smoking-attributable expenditures made by Florida’s Medicaid
program. The lawsuit resulted in the allocation of $11 billion in tobacco
settlement money to the state of Florida, which awarded $50,000 per year to
the Florida Department of Health for programs to prevent tobacco use. Some
of these funds have been allocated to PRAMS to support the collection of an
expanded sample of teen-aged mothers; the number of teen mothers in the
Florida PRAMS sample has increased from about 500 to nearly 1,000 per year.
The prevalence of smoking before, during, and after pregnancy among the teen
population is being examined using PRAMS data. In addition, these data are
being used to assess the impact of smoking on low birth weight and infant
mortality in the state.
Return to Table of Contents
Page last reviewed: 3/24/06
Page last modified: 3/24/06
Content source: Division
of Reproductive Health,
National Center for Chronic Disease
Prevention and Health Promotion |
|
|