|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Phase III Randomized Study of Induction and Intensification Regimens for Childhood Acute Myeloid Leukemia: IDA vs DNR with ARA-C/VP-16 for Induction in All Patients and Intensification with High-Dose ARA-C/DHAD (HAM) Before vs After Consolidation in High-Risk Patients
Alternate Title Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Children With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Objectives I. Compare the efficacy of 2 post-remission strategies for preventing relapse in children with high-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) following remission induction with cytarabine/daunorubicin/etoposide (ADE) or cytarabine/idarubicin/etoposide (AIE): a second induction with HAM (high-dose cytarabine/mitoxantrone) followed by a 6-week multi-agent consolidation regimen followed by intensification with high-dose cytarabine/etoposide vs. the same consolidation regimen followed by HAM as a first intensification followed by high-dose cytarabine/etoposide as a second intensification. II. Compare daunorubicin and idarubicin for the speed of blast reduction during remission induction in children with standard-risk and poor-risk AML randomized for remission induction to ADE vs. AIE. III. Determine whether the treatment strategies that include HAM are more advantageous in patients with high-risk disease than the treatment specified in AML-BFM-87. IV. Evaluate, in standard-risk AML children, whether reduction of the intensification phase to 1 from 2 blocks of therapy affects the event-free interval. V. Compare treatment results in high-risk patients who receive allogeneic bone marrow transplants (BMT) from HLA-identical donors with results in a non-BMT reference group using matched-pair analysis. VI. Investigate the prognostic value of such disease-specific parameters as FAB type, immunophenotype, and cytogenetic and molecular genetic characteristics. Entry Criteria Disease Characteristics: Newly diagnosed childhood acute myeloid leukemia Diagnosis based on morphologic and immunologic criteria No myelodysplastic syndrome No secondary leukemia No Down syndrome Prior/Concurrent Therapy: No more than 2 weeks of cytostatic agents Patient Characteristics: Age: Under 17 Performance status: Not specified Hematopoietic: Not specified Hepatic: Not specified Renal: Not specified Expected Enrollment About 440 patients will be entered over 4 years. Outline Randomized study. All patients are randomized for Induction on Arms I and II. Standard-risk patients are nonrandomly assigned to Regimen A for post-Induction therapy, while high-risk patients are randomized on Arms III and IV for post-Induction therapy. Standard-risk patients are defined as FAB M1/M2 with Auer rods, M3, or M4 with eosinophils who have no more than 5% blasts in the bone marrow on day 15 (excluding FAB M3); all other patients are designated high risk. Patients with testicular involvement receive additional treatment on Regimen C, and those with primary CNS disease receive additional treatment on Regimen D. High-risk patients who achieve CR and who have available identically HLA-matched sibling donors are eligible for ABMT on Regimen E following Consolidation Phase I. The following acronyms are used: ABM Allogeneic Bone Marrow ABMT ABM Transplantation ARA-C Cytarabine, NSC-63878 BU Busulfan, NSC-750 CTX Cyclophosphamide, NSC-26271 DHAD Mitoxantrone, NSC-301739 DOX Doxorubicin, NSC-123127 DNR Daunorubicin, NSC-82151 HD ARA-C High-Dose Cytarabine IDA Idarubicin, NSC-256439 IT ARA-C Intrathecal Cytarabine PRED Prednisone, NSC-10023 TG Thioguanine, NSC-752 VCR Vincristine, NSC-67574 VP-16 Etoposide, NSC-141540 INDUCTION (All Patients). Arm I: 3-Drug Combination Systemic Chemotherapy plus Single-Agent Intrathecal Chemotherapy. ADE: ARA-C/DNR/VP-16; plus IT ARA-C. Arm II: 3-Drug Combination Systemic Chemotherapy plus Single-Agent Intrathecal Chemotherapy. AIE: ARA-C/IDA/VP-16; plus IT ARA-C. POST-INDUCTION REGIMENS. REGIMEN A (Standard-Risk Patients). Consolidation Phase I: 5-Drug Combination Systemic Chemotherapy plus Single-Agent Intrathecal Chemotherapy. PRED/TG/VCR/DOX/ARA-C; plus IT ARA-C. Consolidation Phase II: 3-Drug Combination Systemic Chemotherapy plus Single-Agent Intrathecal Chemotherapy. TG/ARA-C/CTX; plus IT ARA-C. Intensification: 2-Drug Combination Systemic Chemotherapy. HD ARA-C/VP-16. CNS Prophylaxis: Single-Agent Intrathecal Chemotherapy plus Radiotherapy. IT ARA-C; plus whole-brain irradiation using megavoltage equipment. Maintenance: 2-Drug Combination Systemic Chemotherapy. TG/ARA-C. REGIMEN B (High-Risk Patients). ARM III (HAM as Second Induction). Induction II: 2-Drug Combination Systemic Chemotherapy. HAM: HD ARA-C/DHAD. Consolidation Phase I: 5-Drug Combination Systemic Chemotherapy plus Single-Agent Intrathecal Chemotherapy. PRED/TG/VCR/DOX/ARA-C; plus IT ARA-C. Consolidation Phase II: 3-Drug Combination Systemic Chemotherapy plus Single-Agent Intrathecal Chemotherapy. TG/ARA-C/CTX; plus IT ARA-C. Intensification: 2-Drug Combination Systemic Chemotherapy. HD ARA-C/VP-16. CNS Prophylaxis: Single-Agent Intrathecal Chemotherapy plus Radiotherapy. As in Regimen A. Maintenance: 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy. TG/ARA-C. ARM IV (HAM as Post-Consolidation Intensification). Consolidation Phase I: 5-Drug Combination Systemic Chemotherapy plus Single-Agent Intrathecal Chemotherapy. PRED/TG/VCR/DOX/ARA-C; plus IT ARA-C. Consolidation Phase II: 3-Drug Combination Systemic Chemotherapy plus Single-Agent Intrathecal Chemotherapy. TG/ARA-C/CTX; plus IT ARA-C. Intensification I: 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy. HAM: HD ARA-C/DHAD. Intensification II: 2-Drug Combination Systemic Chemotherapy. HD ARA-C/VP-16. CNS Prophylaxis: Single-Agent Intrathecal Chemotherapy plus Radiotherapy. As in Regimen A. Maintenance: 2-Drug Combination Chemotherapy. TG/ARA-C. REGIMEN C (Testicular Leukemia): Radiotherapy. Bilateral testicular irradiation using megavoltage equipment. REGIMEN D (CNS Leukemia at Presentation): Single-Agent Intrathecal Chemotherapy plus Radiotherapy. IT ARA-C; plus whole-brain irradiation using megavoltage equipment. REGIMEN E: 2-Drug Combination High-Dose Marrow-Ablative Chemotherapy followed by ABMT. BU/CTX; followed by ABM.Published Results Lehrnbecher T, Kaiser J, Varwig D, et al.: Antifungal usage in children undergoing intensive treatment for acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of the multicenter clinical trial AML-BFM 93. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 26 (10): 735-8, 2007.[PUBMED Abstract] Lehrnbecher T, Varwig D, Kaiser J, et al.: Infectious complications in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of the prospective multi-institutional clinical trial AML-BFM 93. Leukemia 18 (1): 72-7, 2004.[PUBMED Abstract] Mann G, Reinhardt D, Ritter J, et al.: Treatment with all-trans retinoic acid in acute promyelocytic leukemia reduces early deaths in children. Ann Hematol 80 (7): 417-22, 2001.[PUBMED Abstract] Reinhardt D, Pekrun A, Lakomek M, et al.: Primary myelosarcomas are associated with a high rate of relapse: report on 34 children from the acute myeloid leukaemia-Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster studies. Br J Haematol 110 (4): 863-6, 2000.[PUBMED Abstract] Creutzig U, Hermann J, Gadner H, et al.: Comparison of equipotential doses of daunorubicin and idarubicin during induction: first results of the randomized trial BFM 93 in children with AML. [Abstract] Blood 90 (10 suppl 1): A-2597, 584a, 1997. Related PublicationsCreutzig U, Büchner T, Sauerland MC, et al.: Significance of age in acute myeloid leukemia patients younger than 30 years: a common analysis of the pediatric trials AML-BFM 93/98 and the adult trials AMLCG 92/99 and AMLSG HD93/98A. Cancer 112 (3): 562-71, 2008.[PUBMED Abstract] Creutzig U, Reinhardt D, Zimmermann M, et al.: Prognostic relevance of risk groups in the pediatric AML-BFM trials 93 and 98. Ann Hematol 83 (Suppl 1): S112-6, 2004.[PUBMED Abstract] Creutzig U, Zimmermann M, Reinhardt D, et al.: Early deaths and treatment-related mortality in children undergoing therapy for acute myeloid leukemia: analysis of the multicenter clinical trials AML-BFM 93 and AML-BFM 98. J Clin Oncol 22 (21): 4384-93, 2004.[PUBMED Abstract] Vormoor J, Boos J, Stahnke K, et al.: Therapy of childhood acute myelogenous leukemias. Ann Hematol 73 (1): 11-24, 1996.[PUBMED Abstract] Trial Lead Organizations Klinik und Poliklinik fuer Kinder und Jugendmedizin - Universitaetsklinikum Muenster
Note: The purpose of most clinical trials listed in this database is to test new cancer treatments, or new methods of diagnosing, screening, or preventing cancer. Because all potentially harmful side effects are not known before a trial is conducted, dose and schedule modifications may be required for participants if they develop side effects from the treatment or test. The therapy or test described in this clinical trial is intended for use by clinical oncologists in carefully structured settings, and may not prove to be more effective than standard treatment. A responsible investigator associated with this clinical trial should be consulted before using this protocol. |
NCI Home |
Images Version |
Contact Us |
Policies |
Accessibility |
Viewing Files |
FOIA |
Site Help |
Site Map
|
A Service of the National Cancer Institute |