By the early 1800's, the Atlantic salmon runs in New England had been severely depleted, greatly reducing the species' distribution in the southern half of its range. The earliest impacts were from fishing, water quality degradation, and barriers to migration caused by waste disposal and waterpower development associated with the Industrial Revolution. Restoration efforts were initiated in the mid-1800's, but had little success due to the presence of dams and the inefficiency of early fishways (Stolte 1981). Natural Atlantic salmon runs had disappeared from southern New England Rivers by 1865. There was a brief period in the late 19th Century when limited runs were reestablished in the Merrimack and Connecticut Rivers by artificial propagation, but these runs were extirpated by the end of the century (USFWS 1989). Salmon runs in the large rivers south of the Kennebec River, Maine, disappeared during this same period (Atkins 1874; Kendall 1935). By the end of the 19th Century, three of the five largest salmon populations in New England (in the Connecticut, Merrimack, and Androscoggin Rivers) had been eliminated, shifting the southern extent of the species' distribution approximately 2o north in latitude and 4o east in longitude.
River | CT | PW | MK | SMC | SA | AN | KB | SH | CMC | DT | PB | UN | EMC | NG | PL | MC | EM | DE | SC | SJRW |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accessible | 89,250 | 167 | 251 | 586 | 12,540 | 8,500 | 1,000 | 2,845 | 502 | 800 | 125,000 | 8,360 | 1,022 | 6,015 | 1,085 | 6,685 | 2,145 | 2,415 | 29,260 | 66,175 |
Historic | 173,250 | 8,611 | 83,349 | 24,996 | 18,152 | 62,560 | 113,700 | 2,845 | 3,260 | 800 | 125,000 | 8,360 | 233 | 6,015 | 1,085 | 6,685 | 2,145 | 2,415 | 29,260 | 5,435 |
Connecticut River (CT) | Saco River (SA) | Sheepscot River (SH) | Union
River (UN) | Machias River (MC) | St. Croix River (SC) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pawtucket River (PW) | Androscoggin
River (AN) | Ducktrap River (DT) |
Narraguagus River (NG) | East Machias River (EM) | |
Merrimack River (MK) | Kebbebec River (KB) | Penobscot River (PB) | Pleasant
River (PL) | Dennys River (DE) | |
Southern Maine Coastal (SMC): Salmon Falls, Mousam, Kennebunk,
Presumscot and
Royal Rivers | Central Maine Coastal (CMC): Pemaquid, Medomak, St. George, Little, and Passagassawaukeag Rivers | ||||
Eastern Maine Coastal (EMC): Indian, Chandler, Orange, and Pennamaquan Rivers; Tunk, Hobart and Boyden Streams | St. John River watershed (SJRW): Aroostook and Meduxnekeag Rivers; Prestile stream |
The Penobscot River continued to support a substantial wild population during the late 1800's, with a reported commercial catch of over 10,000 salmon in 1880 (Baum 1997). In subsequent years, a new artificial propagation program initiated in Maine influenced population abundance and distribution. However, the abundance of Atlantic salmon generally continued to decline in all remaining rivers with salmon populations through the last half of the 19th Century and first half of the 20th Century. By the mid 20th Century, the total adult run of Atlantic salmon to U.S. rivers had declined from hundreds of thousands of fish in the early part of the previous century to a probable range of 500-2000 fish, mostly in rivers in eastern Maine (estimated from data reported in the Maine Atlantic Sea-Run Salmon Commission's River Management Report series published in 1983). One of the best years for angling harvest during the period from 1948 through 1970 was 1959 when a total recreational catch of 479 salmon was reported. Of these, 450 (94%) were caught in five rivers in Washington County (Baum 1997). The recreational catch reported for the Penobscot that year was only 2 fish. The primary distribution of Atlantic salmon in the U.S. by the mid-20th Century was, except for a few remnant populations, limited to the eastern third of Maine's coast.
Artificial salmon propagation in Maine continued to use Penobscot-origin fish purchased from commercial trap-netters as the source of eggs into the 20th Century, when declining runs and pricing disputes resulted in a decline in availability of Penobscot salmon for brood stock. Canadian salmon stocks were increasingly used as a source of eggs for the Craig Brook Hatchery in East Orland, Maine, with the Miramichi and Gasp‚ Rivers becoming the primary sources in the 1920's and 1930's. The use of Canadian eggs declined in the 1940's when the Machias River and, for a brief time, the Penobscot again became a source of brood stock. During the 1950's and 1960's, the lack of Penobscot River fish resulted in Canadian salmon again providing a major source of eggs, supplemented with eggs from Machias and Narraguagus brood stock. Hatchery-produced juveniles were stocked as fry and parr, with poor results. The stocking of hatchery-reared smolts of mostly Miramichi and Narraguagus stock origin in the late 1960's brought about the successful rebuilding of the salmon run in the Penobscot (Baum 1997). The resultant adult returns enabled the Penobscot River propagation program to become self-sufficient for eggs and to support the egg needs of all artificial propagation in Maine by the 1970's. Later, this same stock of fish were transplanted into the Union River and comprised essentially the entire source of brood stock for the contemporary (post-1970) Atlantic salmon stocking program in Maine, until the advent of the river-specific propagation program in 1992. This same contemporary Penobscot stock is also the foundation of essentially all Atlantic salmon stocks now used for artificial propagation in the restoration of runs in historic salmon rivers outside of Maine.
The stocking strategy from the start of the artificial propagation program in the 1870's through the 1930's in the United States depended heavily on releasing fry. Most records indicate that early fry stocking methods were dominated by cluster stocking of large numbers of fry in limited areas of a river. Numbers released through artificial propagation programs prior to 1970 were greatest during the 40-year period from 1896 through 1936. These fish were released predominantly as fry. After a 60-year period of predominantly fry releases, the strategy shifted to focus on releasing parr and remained so through the 1950's. By the mid-1960's, the production and stocking of smolts replaced parr as the basic strategy of enhancement and conservation stocking programs (Baum 1997).
Numbers produced and stocked changed greatly, undoubtedly out of logistic necessity, when the target life stage for release changed from fry to parr or smolt. Fry production in the millions annually was common when fry were the focus. Numbers declined by an order of magnitude when hatcheries started to retain fry for rearing to the parr stage. The annual stocking of 1-3 million fry fell to 100,000-300,000 parr during and after the transitional decade of the 1930's. The artificial propagation program had only just started to focus on smolt production prior to the initiation of the contemporary salmon restoration program circa 1970. The production of smolts was on the same general level of numbers as parr at the only major facility in the U.S. producing Atlantic salmon at that time, Craig Brook National Fish hatchery in East Orland, Maine.
Table 4.2.2
. Summary of historic Atlantic salmon stocking (1872-1969) for each U.S. coastal river basin currently known to support wild Atlantic salmon populations. "Contributing Stocks" Code: D= Dennys R.; M= Machias R.; N= Narraguagus R.;P= Penobscot R.; NB= New Brunswick; ON= Ontario; Q= Quebec.
KENNEBEC RIVER
Period |
Number (1,000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1899 (29 Yrs.) |
Fry 87.5 Parr Smolt |
P |
1 |
100 |
No Stocking |
Fry Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
SHEEPSCOT RIVER
Period |
Number (1,000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1899 (29 Yrs.) |
Fry 1.5 Parr Smolt |
ON |
1 |
100 |
Decade of 1900 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1910 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1920 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1930 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1940 |
Fry 30.4 Parr Smolt |
P,NB |
2 |
73 27 |
Decade of 1950 |
Fry 173.8 Parr Smolt |
N,M,NB |
8 |
23 77 |
Decade of 1960 |
Fry 136.5 Parr 65.7 Smolt |
NB,Q |
8 |
100 |
DUCKTRAP RIVER
Period |
Number (1,000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1969 |
NO KNOWN STOCKING OF ATLANTIC SALMON IN DUCKTRAP |
PENOBSCOT RIVER
Period |
Number (1,000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1899 (29 Yrs.) |
5,465.2 Fry 532.8 Parr Smolt |
P |
13 |
100 |
Decade of 1900 |
12,225.8 Fry 1,861.6 Parr Smolt |
P |
10 |
100 |
Decade of 1910 |
20,787.7 Fry 232.9 Parr Smolt |
P |
10 |
100 |
Decade of 1920 |
7,384.6 fry 104.0 Parr Smolt |
P,Q,NB |
10 |
26 74 |
Decade of 1930 |
1,592.5 Fry 677.4 Parr Smolt |
P,NB |
8 |
<1 99+ |
Decade of 1940 |
112.5 Fry 435.5 Parr Smolt |
P,NB |
10 |
94 6 |
Decade of 1950 |
Fry 501.3 Parr Smolt |
M,NB |
7 |
14 86 |
Decade of 1960 |
Fry 73.1 Parr 189.0 Smolt |
M,N,NB |
6 |
65 35 |
NARRAGUAGUS RIVER
Period |
Number (1,000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1899 (29 Yrs.) |
NO Fry STOCKING Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1900 |
NO Fry STOCKING Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1910 |
662.5 Fry Parr Smolt |
P |
2 |
100 |
Decade of 1920 |
463.7 Fry Parr Smolt |
NB,Q |
6 |
100 |
Decade of 1930 |
85.0 Fry Parr Smolt |
NB |
1 |
100 |
Decade of 1940 |
29.3 Fry 56.5 Parr Smolt |
M,P, NB |
4 |
66 34 |
Decade of 1950 |
35.0 Fry 536.0 Parr Smolt |
N,M,P,NB |
10 |
7 7 86 |
Decade of 1960 |
Fry 124.9 Parr 256.1 Smolt |
N,M,NB |
10 |
34 12 54 |
PLEASANT RIVER
Period |
Number (1000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1899 (29 Yrs.) |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1900 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1910 |
437.5 Fry Parr Smolt |
P |
1 |
100 |
Decade of 1920 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1930 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1940 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1950 |
Fry 48.9 Parr Smolt |
N,M,NB |
5 |
20 80 |
Decade of 1960 |
Fry 42.8 Parr 13.6 Smolt |
N,M,NB |
5 |
8 92 |
MACHIAS RIVER
Period |
Number (1000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1899 (29 Yrs.) |
73.3 Fry Parr Smolt |
P |
4 |
100 |
Decade of 1900 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1910 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1920 |
50.0 Fry Parr Smolt |
NB |
1 |
100 |
Decade of 1930 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1940 |
Fry 204.1 Parr Smolt |
P,M,NB |
6 |
35 53 12 |
Decade of 1950 |
100.2 Fry 359.1 Parr Smolt |
P,N,M,NB |
7 |
30 65 5 |
Decade of 1960 |
Fry 130.2 Parr 370.0 Smolt |
N,M,NB |
10 |
22 38 40 |
EAST MACHIAS RIVER
Period |
Number (1,000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1899 (29 Yrs.) |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1900 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1910 |
30.0 Fry Parr Smolt |
P |
1 |
100 |
Decade of 1920 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1930 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1940 |
Fry 7.0 Parr Smolt |
D |
1 |
100 |
Decade of 1950 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1960 |
Fry Parr 24.9 Smolt |
NB |
1 |
100 |
DENNYS RIVER
Period |
Number (1,000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1899 (29 Yrs.) |
191.4 Fry Parr Smolt |
P |
8 |
100 |
Decade of 1900 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1910 |
648.0 Fry Parr Smolt |
P |
2 |
100 |
Decade of 1920 |
Fry 40.0 Parr Smolt |
NB |
9 |
100 |
Decade of 1930 |
360.0 Fry 30.0 Parr Smolt |
NB |
2 |
100 |
Decade of 1940 |
Fry 31.2 Parr 3.2 Smolt |
P,M |
4 |
100 |
Decade of 1950 |
Fry 227.1 Parr Smolt |
NB |
8 |
100 |
Decade of 1960 |
Fry 201.1 Parr Smolt |
N,M,NB |
6 |
43 57 |
Table 4.2.2
. Summary of historic Atlantic salmon stocking (1872-1969) for each U.S. coastal river basin currently known to support wild Atlantic salmon populations. "Contributing Stocks" Code: D= Dennys R.; M= Machias R.; N= Narraguagus R.;P= Penobscot R.; NB= New Brunswick; ON= Ontario; Q= Quebec.
KENNEBEC RIVER
Period |
Number (1,000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1899 (29 Yrs.) |
Fry 87.5 Parr Smolt |
P |
1 |
100 |
No Stocking |
Fry Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
SHEEPSCOT RIVER
Period |
Number (1,000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1899 (29 Yrs.) |
Fry 1.5 Parr Smolt |
ON |
1 |
100 |
Decade of 1900 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1910 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1920 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1930 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1940 |
Fry 30.4 Parr Smolt |
P,NB |
2 |
73 27 |
Decade of 1950 |
Fry 173.8 Parr Smolt |
N,M,NB |
8 |
23 77 |
Decade of 1960 |
Fry 136.5 Parr 65.7 Smolt |
NB,Q |
8 |
100 |
DUCKTRAP RIVER
Period |
Number (1,000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1969 |
NO KNOWN STOCKING OF ATLANTIC SALMON IN DUCKTRAP |
PENOBSCOT RIVER
Period |
Number (1,000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1899 (29 Yrs.) |
5,465.2 Fry 532.8 Parr Smolt |
P |
13 |
100 |
Decade of 1900 |
12,225.8 Fry 1,861.6 Parr Smolt |
P |
10 |
100 |
Decade of 1910 |
20,787.7 Fry 232.9 Parr Smolt |
P |
10 |
100 |
Decade of 1920 |
7,384.6 fry 104.0 Parr Smolt |
P,Q,NB |
10 |
26 74 |
Decade of 1930 |
1,592.5 Fry 677.4 Parr Smolt |
P,NB |
8 |
<1 99+ |
Decade of 1940 |
112.5 Fry 435.5 Parr Smolt |
P,NB |
10 |
94 6 |
Decade of 1950 |
Fry 501.3 Parr Smolt |
M,NB |
7 |
14 86 |
Decade of 1960 |
Fry 73.1 Parr 189.0 Smolt |
M,N,NB |
6 |
65 35 |
NARRAGUAGUS RIVER
Period |
Number (1,000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1899 (29 Yrs.) |
NO Fry STOCKING Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1900 |
NO Fry STOCKING Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1910 |
662.5 Fry Parr Smolt |
P |
2 |
100 |
Decade of 1920 |
463.7 Fry Parr Smolt |
NB,Q |
6 |
100 |
Decade of 1930 |
85.0 Fry Parr Smolt |
NB |
1 |
100 |
Decade of 1940 |
29.3 Fry 56.5 Parr Smolt |
M,P, NB |
4 |
66 34 |
Decade of 1950 |
35.0 Fry 536.0 Parr Smolt |
N,M,P,NB |
10 |
7 7 86 |
Decade of 1960 |
Fry 124.9 Parr 256.1 Smolt |
N,M,NB |
10 |
34 12 54 |
PLEASANT RIVER
Period |
Number (1,000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1899 (29 Yrs.) |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1900 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1910 |
437.5 Fry Parr Smolt |
P |
1 |
100 |
Decade of 1920 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1930 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1940 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1950 |
Fry 48.9 Parr Smolt |
N,M,NB |
5 |
20 80 |
Decade of 1960 |
Fry 42.8 Parr 13.6 Smolt |
N,M,NB |
5 |
8 92 |
MACHIAS RIVER
Period |
Number (1,000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1899 (29 Yrs.) |
73.3 Fry Parr Smolt |
P |
4 |
100 |
Decade of 1900 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1910 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1920 |
50.0 Fry Parr Smolt |
NB |
1 |
100 |
Decade of 1930 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1940 |
Fry 204.1 Parr Smolt |
P,M,NB |
6 |
35 53 12 |
Decade of 1950 |
100.2 Fry 359.1 Parr Smolt |
P,N,M,NB |
7 |
30 65 5 |
Decade of 1960 |
Fry 130.2 Parr 370.0 Smolt |
N,M,NB |
10 |
22 38 40 |
EAST MACHIAS RIVER
Period |
Number (1,000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1899 (29 Yrs.) |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1900 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1910 |
30.0 Fry Parr Smolt |
P |
1 |
100 |
Decade of 1920 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1930 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1940 |
Fry 7.0 Parr Smolt |
D |
1 |
100 |
Decade of 1950 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1960 |
Fry Parr 24.9 Smolt |
NB |
1 |
100 |
DENNYS RIVER
Period |
Number (1,000's) and Life Stage |
Contributing Stocks |
# Years |
STOCK ORIGIN (% of Total Stocked) Home Other ME. Canadian River River Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
1872-1899 (29 Yrs.) |
191.4 Fry Parr Smolt |
P |
8 |
100 |
Decade of 1900 |
NONE Fry STOCKED Parr Smolt |
|
|
|
Decade of 1910 |
648.0 Fry Parr Smolt |
P |
2 |
100 |
Decade of 1920 |
Fry 40.0 Parr Smolt |
NB |
9 |
100 |
Decade of 1930 |
360.0 Fry 30.0 Parr Smolt |
NB |
2 |
100 |
Decade of 1940 |
Fry 31.2 Parr 3.2 Smolt |
P,M |
4 |
100 |
Decade of 1950 |
Fry 227.1 Parr Smolt |
NB |
8 |
100 |
Decade of 1960 |
Fry 201.1 Parr Smolt |
N,M,NB |
6 |
43 57 |
The BRT acknowledges that historic stocking practices may have had an adverse effect upon the genetic integrity of local stocks. However, the capabilities of these early programs were limited in technology, distribution capabilities, and knowledge of stocking strategies. Available evidence suggests that these efforts resulted in only negligible adult returns from stocking. In fact, some reports document an increase in small salmon returns during stocking (Kendall 1935) that quickly reversed after broodstock were changed to native stocks. Poor hatchery return rates coupled with remnant natural stocks led the BRT to conclude that while some negative effects upon the genetic integrity of these stocks are possible, introgression could not have supplemented native genotypes within the Gulf of Maine DPS.