 |
 |
| 10.579 CHILD NUTRITION DISCRETIONARY GRANTS LIMITED AVAILABILITY |
| FEDERAL AGENCY |
| FOOD AND NUTRITION SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE |
| AUTHORIZATION |
| Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 1751, 1758, 1759a,1761, 1765, 1766, 1769, 1772, 1773, 1779; School Breakfast Program (SBP); Child Nutrition Act of 1966, as amended, Public Laws 108-265, 104-193, 100-435, 99-661, 97-35; Special Milk Program (SMP); Child Nutrition Act of 1966, as amended; Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP); 89 Stat. 522-525, Summer Food Service Program (SFSP). |
| OBJECTIVES |
| NSLP: To assist States, through cash grants and food donations, in making the school lunch program available to school children and to encourage the domestic consumption of nutritious agricultural commodities. SBP: To assist States in providing a nutritious nonprofit breakfast service for school children, through cash grants and food donations. SMP: To provide subsidies to schools and institutions to encourage the consumption of fluid milk by children. CACFP: To assist States, through grants-in-aid and other means, to initiate and maintain nonprofit food service programs for children, elderly or impaired adults in nonresidential day care facilities and children in emergency shelters. SFSP: To assist States, through grants-in-aid and other means, to conduct nonprofit food service programs for low-income children during the summer months and at other approved times, when schools are out of session or are closed for vacation. |
| TYPES OF ASSISTANCE |
| Project Grants (Discretionary). |
| USES AND USE RESTRICTIONS |
| Determined by the legislation providing the grants. Examples of grants in this category include the Child Nutrition and WIC Reauthorization Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-265) which authorized funds for State agencies to perform administrative reviews and training of selected local education agencies participating in the NSLP. The purpose of these funds is to improve program integrity and administrative accuracy by decreasing administrative errors in those local education agencies identified by the States as having problems or where problems are likely to arise. The funds cannot be used to replace or augment funding allocated for existing review requirements and they cannot be used for local level expenses associated with administrative reviews or training activities. In addition, P.L. 108-265 authorized funding for grants under the SFSP to increase participation at congregate feeding sites through innovative approaches for overcoming limited transportation resources in rural areas. These multi-year grants were awarded in December 2005 on a competitive basis to Mississippi (6 sponsors), New York (7 sponsors), Oregon (8 sponsors), Texas (2 sponsors), and West Virginia (7 sponsors). The projects may not comprise pre-award costs associated with the development of a grant application or the cost of obtaining food. Over the course of 3 years, $4 million will be available to the 5 States. Additional examples of grants in this category include the Consolidated Appropriations Resolution for Fiscal Year 2003 (Public Law 108-7) which provided funds for eligible schools to cover costs associated with implementing the SBP. The purpose of these grants was to increase the number of schools participating in the SBP, particularly those serving low-income children. The grants were used for State level costs associated with the administration of the SBP grant activities and local level costs that were allowable, reasonable, and necessary for an approved school to implement the SBP. The State agency could retain no more than 17.5% of the grant award for State level costs associated with the administration of the grant activities. |
| Applicant Eligibility |
| Determined by the legislation providing the grants. |
| Beneficiary Eligibility |
| Determined by the legislation providing the grants. |
| Credentials/Documentation |
| Determined by the legislation providing the grants. For example, the SBP Grants under Public Law 108-7 earmarked funds for a specific State, with the remaining funds to be awarded competitively. Eleven States were identified that had less than 60 percent of their NSLP Schools participating in the SBP over the past 3 years. These States received an Application for SBP Start-up Grant Funds. |
| Preapplication Coordination |
| Instructions provided in Request for Application. This program is excluded from coverage under E.O. 12372. |
| Application Procedure |
| Application package should be sent to FNS Headquarters, Charles Okal, Chief, Grant Management Branch Food and Nutrition Service, Grants Management Division, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 738, Alexandria, VA 22302 or submitted electronically via www.grants.gov http://.grants.gov. |
| Award Procedure |
| A grant review technical panel objectively reviews all complete applications according to established review criteria provided in the Request for Applications and makes recommendations to Agency officials, who make final award decisions. |
| Deadlines |
| Provided in Request for Application. |
| Range of Approval/Disapproval Time |
| Determined by the legislation providing the grants. |
| Appeals |
| Determined by the legislation providing the grants. |
| Renewals |
| Determined by the legislation providing the grants. For example, a due date was established for the SBP and grants were awarded after review of all submissions by a selection panel from FNS and receipt of a Letter of Intent from the selected States. All State and local level SBP Grant funds had to be obligated by September 30, 2005 and expended by December 15, 2005. |
| Formula and Matching Requirements |
| None. |
| Length and Time Phasing of Assistance |
| Determined by the legislation providing the grants. |
| Reports |
| Instructions provided in Request for Application. |
| Audits |
| In accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular No. A-133, "Audits of States, Local Governments, and Nonprofit Organizations," State governments that expend Federal financial assistance of $500,000 or more within any fiscal year shall have either a single audit or (in certain cases) a program specific audit made for that year. Audits may be conducted less frequently under conditions specified in A-133. |
| Records |
| State agencies must maintain records as necessary to support the use of Grant funds in accordance with the Grant Agreement. Such records must be retained for a period of 3 years after the date of submission of the final report for the fiscal year to which the records pertain, except that if audit findings have not been resolved, the records shall be retained beyond the three year period as long as required for the resolution of the issues raised by the audit. |
| Account Identification |
| 12-3539-0-1-605. |
| Obligations |
| (Grants) FY 07 $2,997,672; FY 08 est not available; and FY 09 est not reported. (NOTE: Availability limited based on eligibility requirements or duration by current year appropriations or authorizing legislation language and Agency priorities, determined by the legislation providing the grants.) |
| Range and Average of Financial Assistance |
| Provided in Request for Application. |
| PROGRAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS |
| Determined by the legislation providing the grants. |
| REGULATIONS, GUIDELINES, AND LITERATURE |
| 7 CFR Part 3016, 7 CFR Part 3017, 7 CFR Part 3018. |
| Regional or Local Office |
| See the Food and Nutrition Service Regional Offices listed in Appendix IV of the Catalog. |
| Headquarters Office |
| Headquarters Office Grants Management Division, Food and Nutrition Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Alexandria, VA 22302. Contact: Charles Okal, Chief, Grants Management Branch, Grants Management Division at (703) 305-2854. |
| Web Site Address |
| http://www.fns.usda.gov |
| RELATED PROGRAMS |
| None. |
| EXAMPLES OF FUNDED PROJECTS |
| None. |
| CRITERIA FOR SELECTING PROPOSALS |
| None. |
|
General Services Administration Office of Chief Acquisition Officer Regulatory and Federal Assistance Division (VIR) |
|