The State of the Laboratory -- 1986
Text of the annual State-of-the-Laboratory address, delivered by Alan
Schriesheim, Argonne director and chief executive officer, November 20, 1986, in
Argonne-East's Building 213 cafeteria.
This is an historic occasion.
I don't say that because this state of the laboratory report falls in the 40th
anniversary year of our laboratory. This is a notable occasion more in the
perspective of recent history. This is the first time since we started having
these reports some six years ago that laboratory management can make the
following prediction: "We have every confidence that our budget for the fiscal
year we have just started will be higher than the fiscal year we just
completed."
As always, we must accompany this prediction with warnings. Much of the
funding that we expect to flow to this laboratory is not specifically
designated in the congressional appropriations bills as Argonne's. The
Department of Energy must still apportion the monies that Congress has
appropriated. There could still be variations between what we've been told to
expect and what finally comes down to us. Nevertheless, our best estimate
indicates clearly that our budget for 1987 will be up over that of 1986. There
could be changes in staffing levels from division to division. But our overall
employment total for the current year should at least remain level.
Last year at this time, I described to you how our new initiatives had enabled
us to avoid a 1,400-person employment cut and bring our funding about level
with the previous year. At that time, we were estimating a fiscal 1986 budget
of about $224 million. In the course of the year, total funding that came to
the laboratory rose to $231 million.
A promising fiscal year
As we start fiscal 1987, we are conservatively estimating our budget at about
$235 million. It is possible that during the year our funding could rise,
possibly approaching $250 million. But we can't count on that increase without
risking precipitous cutbacks in employment should that optimistic assumption
prove wrong.
What accounts for this historic turnaround? Why, for the first time in six
years, are we going to get enough money to offset inflation and perhaps some
more that represents real program growth? The answer is hard work and
dedication in every corner of the laboratory. Most important, we have
successfully advanced our new initiatives so that they received increased
funding, or increased recognition, or both. Let me explain what I mean.
IFR is "flagship of DOE program"
One of our most important initiatives is the Integral Fast Reactor. Last year
it was funded at about $13.5 million. In 1987, we expect about $20 million.
But the increase in recognition of the IFR exceeds even the increase in the
appropriation. This Argonne concept is recognized within the nuclear community
and increasingly in Congress as a leader in the competition for an advanced
breeder reactor design for the nation. A nuclear official at DOE called it
"the flagship of our program" on network TV.
The emergence of the IFR resulted largely from the publicity that was generated
around two landmark tests carried out at Experimental Breeder Reactor II in
April. While the reactor was running at full power, the accident prevention
devices that normally protect it were blocked out and the cooling was
deliberately cut off. Without human or mechanical intervention, the reactor
shut itself down safely.
Three weeks later, the Russian reactor at Chernobyl provided a disastrous real
life contrast to Argonne's experimental demonstration. Broad national press
coverage thrust the IFR into the leadership role which the nuclear community
had been waiting cautiously to have filled. Gerry Golden and Pete Planchon
deserve the credit for leading this team effort on the EBR-II safety tests.
Of course we are not the only ones working on an advanced reactor concept. But
even Rockwell International and General Electric, who have won government
contracts to develop advanced reactor designs, have adopted Argonne's metallic
fuel and the concept of pool cooling from EBR-II. We are doing work here for
both firms on their advanced concepts.
Clearly, Argonne has reconfirmed its rank as the nation's preeminent reactor
development laboratory.
Synchrotron light source
Or let's take the Argonne synchrotron light source. I should explain that last
year at this time we called it the 6 GeV Synchrotron Light Source. Then, when
the energy range in which it was to be built came under reconsideration, we
called it the "GXS" or Giga X-ray Source. Finally a third working handle was
assigned to it, the "Advanced Photon Source" or the APS. That will be the name
unless and until we can find a better one.
In fiscal 1986, we received about $2 million to do advanced work on the light
source. In the 1987 budget, $3 million was designated to Argonne. Even more
important than this 50 percent increase, the synchrotron light source has been
publicly designated by DOE officials to be built at Argonne. We now have DOE
backing. In fact, since this is an occasion to give personal credit for some
of the accomplishments of this year, we ought to acknowledge the key role that
Al Trivelpiece, DOE's director of energy research, is playing in supporting the
Argonne light source as part of his master plan for much needed national
research facilities.
The emergence of our laboratory as the chosen site for this big accelerator
project is directly due to an energetic and expert blitz by a series of teams
under Yang Cho and Gopal Shenoy. They gave Argonne the lead in competition
with other laboratories. Then they quickly cleared a series of inspections and
evaluations by DOE and the Office of Management and Budget, which traditionally
have taken much longer to satisfy.
Now, unless there is a total reversal in DOE's approach to this project, the
question is not if the light source will be built at Argonne, but
when. Our current assignment is to accomplish the pre-construction
R&D as quickly and efficiently as we can, and to be ready for a start of
construction.
Meanwhile, a light source team is doing an excellent job in developing user
support as evidenced by the 291 people who attended the first annual users
meeting last week. We have demonstrated the competence within our own team.
We have seen the enthusiasm of the users. And we have the approval of DOE.
Clearly, Argonne's synchrotron light source represents a major victory
contributing to a healthy state of the laboratory in fiscal 1987.
Chemistry of energy processes
A third major initiative, which was launched last year, was the study of the
fundamental chemistry of energy processes. Funding went from $7.8 million in
1986 to roughly $8.5 million in fiscal 1987. The budget for that initiative
has increased $1.8 million over the last two years.
Fostering that funding growth has been the high quality of science already
conducted by this new center. Particularly significant has been research on
how electron transfers are made to store solar energy through chemical bonds,
and the chemical reactivity of extremely small clusters of metallic atoms.
Leading the teams that conduct those studies are Jim Norris and Stephen
Riley.
Funding for our advanced computing initiative totals about $1.5 million this
year compared to $3 million last year. Actually, this constitutes about level
operating budget. Last year we spent a great deal for equipment, specifically
five new parallel computer systems with diverse architectures. They were
installed in our Advanced Computing Research Facility, a unique users
laboratory with a national clientele.
Argonne teams already have used this center to obtain a new algorithm for
Eigenvalue computation, and the development of new techniques for measuring
performance of parallel programs. Development of parallel logic programming
has put Argonne at the center of an international effort to create a high
performance parallel logic programming system. Among the leaders in those
efforts are Jack Dongarra, Dan Sorensen, Ken Dritz, Ewing Lusk, and Ross
Overbeek.
Industrial initiatives
Two of our major initiatives in the area of improving America's industrial
competitiveness are undergoing the happy transition from largely verbal support
to fiscal support.
Last year, the steel initiative was funded at a level of $250,000. In the 1987
budget, $5.2 million has been designated for use over two years at Argonne.
Working on an extremely tight budget, the Argonne researchers have, with their
industrial counterparts, developed significant ideas for which patents have
been applied, so we cannot discuss them in detail. Currently, the Department
of Energy is trying to develop the system through which industry will
contribute an additional $1.6 million. Similarly, an initiative in
biotechnology has gone from the discussion and planning stage with no funding
last year to $300,000 provided by the state of Illinois to Argonne this year.
Two areas of research that have been most threatened by cuts at the
congressional level have been fossil and conservation. But this year,
Argonne's programs were protected by specific congressional language that
directed that funding for Argonne should be at a level equivalent to 1986.
That is about $15.2 million for the two programs.
$51 million in work for others
One of the areas of fastest growth in the Argonne budget has been in work for
others. It rose from $40.8 million in 1986 to an estimated $51 million in
1987. Roughly half of that is in defense work, which increased from $20
million to $26 million. A representative success story from this general area
is in the neutral particle beam funded by the Strategic Defense Initiative. By
using an existing accelerator, the first leg of the Intense Pulsed Neutron
Source, we have been able to conduct high-quality science, save the taxpayers
millions of dollars, and provide money that has helped to support our basic
research at IPNS.
There is always the temptation in reports like this one to focus on the new
initiatives and the big projects. But it is important also to recognize that
Argonne's growth depends on the high quality of research conducted in
established programs -- some of them big, some of them little.
ATLAS accelerator
Certainly the ATLAS accelerator falls into that category. A little more than a
year ago, ATLAS, the world's first superconducting heavy-ion accelerator, was
completed and immediately went into service as a national user facility.
Hardly had Lowell Bollinger finished sweeping up the confetti from the
dedication ceremony than Ken Shepard was busy on an upgrade project that will
make the ATLAS beam current 100 times more intense and extend the mass range of
projectiles up to uranium. This is being accomplished through the development
of a new class of superconducting accelerator structures.
Intense Pulsed Neutron Source
Similarly, the Intense Pulsed Neutron Source has been undergoing almost
constant upgrade. By installing an enriched-uranium booster target, we are
tripling the neutron flux, which permits more experiments, more difficult
experiments and new areas of research. In 1986, although operating for only 22
weeks, the Intense Pulsed Neutron Source, operating under its new director,
Bruce Brown, set records for number of experiments performed, 212; and number
of visitors who came to Argonne for at least one experiment, 182.
Research excellence
Examples of such excellence abound in many corners of the laboratory, and other
labs as well.
Most Argonne people are not aware of the important work of the High Energy
Physics Division in international collaboration at the CDF detector at
Fermilab's collider, and the Zeus detector at the Hera collider in Hamburg,
Germany.
Gian Felcher of the Materials Science Division recently won the DOE
basic-energy-science/materials-science award for using polarized neutron
reflection as a non-destructive technique to probe magnetism in the 20-500
atoms that form the surface of materials.
In September, a team of Argonne scientists headed by program manager Vassilios
Stamoudis of the Environmental Research Division, successfully demonstrated a
new portable detector weighing less than 20 pounds and operated by lantern
batteries. It is designed to detect, identify and quantify 30 of the most
common and hazardous chemicals.
A team that includes Carol Giometti, Doug Grahn and John Taylor from the
Biological and Medical Research Division has demonstrated a powerful new tool
for basic genetic research. Their work proved that two-dimensional gel
electrophoresis, combined with computerized data analysis, can detect heritable
mutations. This Argonne technique identifies changes in the protein
composition of offspring of animals treated with chemicals or radiation.
Team work between Chemical Technology and Materials and Components Technology
led by John Ackerman and Darrell Fee achieved actual operation of the first
Argonne monolithic fuel cell for about 800 hours at a high power density. In
separate experiments they generated the highest current densities -- which is
the amount of current per surface area -- ever achieved in any fuel cell.
Support excellence
Obviously scientific research and development are the core of Argonne's
mission. But without excellence in laboratory activities outside of the direct
research areas, the laboratory could not have achieved the turnaround that has
taken place in recent years.
In our support operations, for example, our program of cost control and
productivity enhancement has been praised by DOE and emulated by other
laboratories. At the same time, we are putting in place a support system that
will contribute directly to more effective scientific and technical efforts.
As any driver or pedestrian in the inner circle can testify, we are digging the
trenches and conducting the other construction involved in our own private
business exchange for voice and data communications. Under the guidance of
Larry Amiot, the new system will switch over next fall. And we enjoyed really
impressive savings in the negotiations to purchase this new state-of-the-art
technology.
The laboratory's computer capability will be increased five fold with the
installation of a high-performance computer, which is now in the bidding
process. Overall, the laboratory has about $40 million of construction work in
progress. We completed and occupied the new security building and the
electronics/motion picture/graphic arts building, along with the new Visitors'
Reception Center and main entrance for the laboratory.
Stronger communication channels
We have also strengthened our institutional channels for outreach to the
industrial and academic community. Our Technology Transfer Center this year
has established the ASPIRE patent evaluation process to select patents for
ownership by the University of Chicago. The laboratory and the university
established the AR-CH Development Corporation to take title of these patents
and license them to form new ventures. Just recently, Steven Lazarus, an
exceptionally qualified industry executive, became the president of AR-CH. At
the same time, the state of Illinois identified and funded Argonne as one of
the state's 14 technology commercialization centers.
The Division of Educational Programs has fostered several hundred collaborative
research projects involving about 1,000 staff and university faculty members.
New collaborations developed during last year include a joint program that
enables the University of Wisconsin to offer a special program in accelerator
physics. A similar collaboration is being developed in nuclear engineering at
Iowa State. DEP expects to sponsor the first annual Argonne Science Bowl for
competing high school teams in science and mathematics.
Communications and marketing
Finally, there is one pervasive development at Argonne that has contributed
significantly to our health: There is a praiseworthy general improvement in the
ability of both scientists and support staff to communicate their activities
and to market them. The improvement is evident in Washington among our program
sponsors. It is noticeable when we have important visitors touring the lab.
It was clearly evident at the recent very successful open house.
I am not talking about "hard sell." Argonne people have simply become better
at seeing the world in the terms of other people's needs, and presenting what
we do or want to do in terms of those needs. That is one reason we are
enjoying increased support. Our support is also enhanced by the help we get
from our friends -- the University of Chicago, the various governing boards
over Argonne, the congressional delegation -- especially from Illinois and from
Idaho -- and even from our neighboring communities, who have organized into an
organization called the Argonne Regional Consortium.
If I sound proud of these achievements, I will have to say I am. All of us
should be proud of them. But if I sound satisfied, I certainly am not. None
of us can afford to be.
Deliverance from the wilderness
Fiscal 1987 should represent the deliverance of Argonne out of the wilderness.
The end of that period when, whatever we did, our reward seemed to be further
cuts in our budget and threats to our programs. But we can only continue our
progress by continuing to run scared and run hungry. If we don't, we could
lose the competitive edge that we have earned with such difficulty over recent
years.
When we score a success, we need to follow it up with another success as we
have with ATLAS and with IPNS. That is why in 1987 we will be adding a
sophisticated new $2 million 300-KeV high-spatial-resolution analytical
electron microscope to our evolving microscopy center in the Materials Science
Division, which already includes the High Voltage Electron Microscope.
Anticipating needs and initiatives
We need to continue generating new initiatives that not only reflect DOE energy
policy, but anticipate it. That is what we did with the IFR, and in our
industrial competitive initiatives like the steel project. We saw a national
need and got a little ahead of the crowd in starting to develop an answer to
that need.
So in addressing our future, we have to ask ourselves what are the new areas of
national need and the ones that will emerge over the next few years? Clearly
one of those areas is toxic waste. That is an area that deserves and is
getting our attention. In the future, we also have to keep examining our own
organization and programs. That is why we re-organized to create a separate
Associate Laboratory Director's post for head of the synchrotron light source.
That is why we combined Components Technology and Materials Technology.
This year we must face up to a major organizational problem. We have a cluster
of about 70 small programs in fossil and conservation. Harvey Drucker and his
associates are working to consolidate them into five or six programs, each of
which will have a critical mass, will have an identity that we can establish in
Washington, and have a size that we can sustain through specific funding.
Finally and above all, we need to keep encouraging top performance.
Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes my report on the state of the laboratory.
It has been a pleasure -- both because of the achievements of the laboratory
and because for the first time in a long time, the hard work that all of you
put in over recent years is being rewarded with greater security in funding for
the new year.
|