skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 21, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > OFCCP Collection
USDOL/OALJ Reporter

OFCCP v. Burlington Industries, Inc., ARB No. 01-008, ALJ No. 1990-OFC-10 (ARB Dec. 21, 2000)


U.S. Department of LaborAdministrative Review Board
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210
DOL
Seal

ARB CASE NO. 01-008
ALJ CASE NO. 90-OFC-10
DATE: December 21, 2000

In the Matter of:

OFFICE OF FEDERAL CONTRACT
COMPLIANCE PROGRAMS, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
    PLAINTIFF,

   v.

BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC.,
    DEFENDANT.

BEFORE: THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD

Appearances:

For the Plaintiff:
   Debra A. Millenson, Esq., Gary M. Buff, Esq., Henry L. Solano, Esq.,
      U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, DC

For the Defendant:
   William P. H. Cary, Esq.,
      Brooks, Pierce, McLendon, Humphrey & Leonard, Greensboro, North Carolina

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

   This case arose when the U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) filed a complaint against Burlington Industries alleging that Burlington had violated Executive Order 11246. A Department of Labor Administrative Law Judge issued a recommended decision and order from which both parties filed exceptions with the Administrative Review Board pursuant to 41 C.F.R. §60-30.28. Subsequent to a recent Board order granting OFCCP's request for supplemental briefing, the parties have filed a Joint Motion to Dismiss.


[Page 2]

   In support of the Motion to Dismiss the parties assert:

Since the date of the Board's Order, the parties have exchanged information concerning the matters at issue in the case and current hiring practices at the Pioneer I plant. As a result of those discussions, the parties have concluded that justice would best be served by dismissing this action. By this motion, each of the parties therefore withdraws the exceptions that it has filed in this matter and respectfully respects [sic] that the underlying action be dismissed.

Joint Motion to Dismiss at 2. Accordingly, we GRANT the parties' joint motion and DISMISS this case.

    SO ORDERED.

       PAUL GREENBERG
       Chair

       CYNTHIA L. ATTWOOD
       Member

       RICHARD A. BEVERLY
       Alternate Member



Phone Numbers