skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
October 4, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > USDOL/OALJ Reporter
USDOL/OALJ Reporter

   Murphy v. Internal Revnue Service , No. 05-5139 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 22, 2006)
   (vacating Aug. 22, 2006 judgment)
   (related to Leveille v. New York Air National Guard, ARB No. 98-079, ALJ Nos. 1994-TSC-3 and 4)


   


United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT

No. 05-5139

September Term, 2006
                  03cv02414
Filed On: December 22, 2006

[1012659]

   

Marrita Murphy and Daniel J. Leveille,
      Appellants

   v.

Internal Revenue Service and United States of
America,
      Appellees

   BEFORE: Ginsburg, Chief Judge, and Rogers and Brown, Circuit Judges

O R D E R

   It is ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that this case be scheduled for oral argument before the above-named panel at 9:30 a.m. on Monday, April 23, 2007. It is

   FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment filed August 22, 2006, be vacated. It is

   FURTHER ORDERED, on the court’s own motion, that the following briefing schedule apply in this case:

Brief and Appendix for Appellant

January 22, 2007

Brief for Amicus for Appellant

January 22, 2007

Brief for Appellee

February 21, 2007

Reply Brief for Appellant

March 7, 2007

   Appellant must raise all issues and arguments in the opening brief. The court ordinarily will not consider issues and arguments raised for the first time in the reply brief.

   Parties are strongly encouraged to hand deliver their briefs to the Clerk's office on the date due. Filing by mail could delay the processing of the brief. Additionally, parties are reminded that if filing by mail, they must use a class of mail that is at least as expeditious as first-class mail. See Fed. R. App. P. 25(a). All briefs and appendices United States Court of Appeals


Page 2

must contain the date that the case is scheduled for oral argument at the top of the cover. See D.C. Cir. Rule 28(a)(8). Because the briefing schedule is keyed to oral argument, the court will grant requests for extensions of time limits for briefs only for extraordinarily compelling reasons.

            FOR THE COURT:
            Mark J. Langer, Clerk

         BY:

            Cheri Carter
            Deputy Clerk

-->



Phone Numbers