Office of Administrative Law Judges 50 Fremont Street, Suite 2100 San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 744-6577 (415) 744-6569 (FAX)
Issue Date: 27 June 2003
CASE NO.'s 2003-AIR-0019, 0020
In the Matter of:
CRAIG FRIDAY,
Complainant,
vs.
NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC.,
Respondent.
ORDER DENYING FURTHER DISCOVERY AND GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Introduction
Mr. Craig Friday filed two complaints against his former employer, Northwest Airlines, Inc., on April 30 and November 18, 2002 under Section 519 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century, 49 U.S.C. § 42121. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration ("OSHA") found that Complainant did not make the necessary prima facie showing required to support further investigation in either case. Complainant filed a timely request for a hearing with the Office of Administrative Law Judges ("OALJ"). Respondent answered with a Motion for Summary Judgment. Complainant moved for and I granted a continuance and a request under Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 56(f) for further discovery prior to deciding on the Motion for Summary Judgment. During the period allowed for further discovery, Complainant filed a Memorandum in Support of Discovery in Response to Second Order Pertaining to Motion for Discovery, requesting further discovery. Complainant has not filed any papers in opposition to Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment.
For the reasons set forth below, further discovery is DENIED, the Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the complaints are DISMISSED.
Background Facts
This matter arises under Section 519 of the Wendell H. Ford Aviation Investment and Reform Act for the 21st Century (AIR-21), 49 U.S.C. § 42121. AIR-21 gives employees of air carriers protection from retaliation when an employee provides information to his employer or to the government concerning any "violation or alleged violation of any order, regulation, or standard of the Federal Aviation Administration or any other provision of Federal law relating to air carrier safety... ." The Procedural Regulations for handing complaints under AIR-21 are found in Title 29 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 1979.
Northwest Airlines, Inc. (hereafter "Northwest") is an "air carrier" falling under the statute. 49 U.S.C. § 42121(a); 29 C.F.R. § 1979.101. Captain Craig Friday was a pilot who formerly flew for Northwest. In late 1998, Friday was ordered by Northwest to undergo a psychiatric evaluation. After being examined by a psychiatrist, he was diagnosed with "Cognitive Disorder NOS." On December 17, 1999, Friday agreed to voluntarily terminate his employment with Northwest, under oath in an arbitration proceeding, in exchange for being offered the benefits of "Disability Retirement" as defined in the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) Collective Bargaining Agreement. The agreement includes return rights which allow Friday to return to Northwest within seven years if his condition is cured. CX F.
[Page 2]
Northwest's filings show a protracted history of disagreements and litigation between Friday and Northwest. From 1997 until his retirement in 1998, Friday filed at least thirteen labor and safety-related grievances against Northwest with the ALPA. RX 4. Friday's retirement from Northwest was also the subject of a lawsuit, alleging wrongful discharge, disability discrimination, age discrimination, retaliation, intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress, and defamation. RX 1. Chief Judge John C. Coughenour, of the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington granted Northwest's Motion for Summary Judgment on that suit on November 2, 2000. RX 5. The Ninth Circuit affirmed. Friday v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 31 Fed. Appx. 391 (9th Cir. 2002) (unpublished opinion).
Captain Friday has been a prolific writer of letters expressing his concerns about safety at Northwest. In response to a letter written by Friday in 1997, the FAA investigated weight and balance safety procedures at Northwest and issued a detailed report. RX 14. The report noted that while the investigation uncovered some "isolated problems" -- which were being adequately addressed by Northwest -- Northwest's weight and balance system was not in the "failure mode" alleged by Friday. Since then, Friday has written letters to, inter alios, Northwest CEO Richard Anderson, Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao, U.S. Representative Jennifer Dunn, Senator Maria Cantwell, Senator Ernest Hollings, various FAA and DOL officials, and Presidents Clinton and Bush expressing his continued concern for airline safety and decrying what he sees as Northwest's attempts to silence him. RX 25, 27, 29, 30, CX A, C, J, K, Q.
1Friday's first complaint also alleged a violation of Section 11(c) of the Occupational Health and Safety Act, 29 U.S.C. § 660(c). See C.F.R. § 1979.103(e). 29 U.S.C. § 660(C)(2) provides that , "[If] the Secretary determines that the provisions of this subsection have been violated, he shall bring an action in any appropriate United States district court against such person. In any such action, the United States district courts shall have jurisdiction... ." Thus, I do not address this claim here since jurisdiction appears to be exclusively in the U.S. district courts.
2Delegation of Authority and Assignment of Responsibility to the Assistant Secretary For Occupational Health and Safety, 65 Fed. Reg. 50017 (August 16, 2000).
3Specifically, he alleges that ex parte communications between Northwest and OSHA led to improper dismissals. These communications appear to be explicitly authorized by the statute. 42 U.S.C. §42121 ("...affording the [Respondent] an opportunity to submit to the Secretary of Labor a written response to the complaint and an opportunity to meet with a representative of the Secretary to present statements from witnesses... ").
4This fact is unverified. The copy of the Travel Authority Card in Exhibit L was undated, as there was no image of the front side. The additional cards were not attached as evidence.
5Note that if the property ban had prevented Friday from appearing as a witness at Robinson's arbitration, the aggrieved party would be Robinson, not Friday. This is a moot issue as Northwest was willing to hold the arbitration elsewhere.
6The coding "DRP" appears next to Friday's name in the 2002 roster.
7 If, for instance, Friday had reached a point where his reinstatement efforts required an examination by a doctor on company property or the use of a flight simulator in a Northwest facility and Northwest prevented him from doing so, Friday might properly allege unfavorable personnel action.