skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
October 3, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
Legislative History of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1367, S. Rep. No. 92-414


(S. Rep. No. 92-414, reprinted in 1972 U.S. Code Cong. & Admin. News 3668,3748-49)

Section 507--Employee Protection

This section offers protection to employees who believe they have been fired or discriminated against as a result of the fact that they may have testified or brought suit under this Act. The employee may apply to the Secretary of Labor for review of his case. The Secretary of Labor can issue an order for the employee to be rehired, or otherwise compensated, if the employee's case is justified. The section does not apply to an employee who acts outside the direction of his employer.

Section 507 of the bill is patterned after the National Labor Management Act and a similar provision in Public Law 91-173 relating to the health and safety of the Nation's coal miners. Under this section employees and union officials could help assure that employers do not contribute to the degradation of our environment.

Any worker who is called upon to testify or who gives information with respect to an alleged violation of a pollution control law by his employer or who files or institutes any proceeding to enforce a pollution control law against an employer may be subject to discrimination.

The section would prohibit any firing or discrimination and would provide an administrative procedure under which the employee or his representative could seek redress for any violation of this prohibition. The Secretary of Labor would investigate such charges and issue findings and a decision which would be subject to judicial review. If the Secretary of Labor would investigate such charges and issue findings and a decision which would be subject to judicial review. If the Secretary should find a violation, he would issue orders to abate it, including where appropriate, the rehiring of the employee to his former position with back pay. Also, the person committing the violation could be assessed the costs incurred by the employee to obtain redress.

This provision would safeguard the rights of employees, but it should not encourage employees to frivolously allege violations since the employee would have to pay the costs of the proceedings unless the violation is proved.

In order to avoid abuse of the protection afforded under this Section the Committee has added a provision which would deny its applicability to any Employee who, without direction from his employer, deliberately violates or wilfully contributed to a violation of any standard, requirement or regulation under the Act.



Phone Numbers