skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 25, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Gergans v. Edward Hines Jr., Hospital North Chicago Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 94-ERA-26 (Sec'y Dec. 7, 1994)


DATE:  December 7, 1994
CASE NO. 94-ERA-26


IN THE MATTER OF

GREGORY A. GERGANS, M.D.,

          COMPLAINANT,

     v.

EDWARD HINES, JR., HOSPITAL 
NORTH CHICAGO, VETERANS 
AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER,

          RESPONDENT.


BEFORE:   THE SECRETARY OF LABOR


                         FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

     On September 27, 1994, the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ)
issued a [Recommended] Order of Dismissal in this case arising
under the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended (ERA),
42 U.S.C. § 5851 (1988).  The ALJ concluded that the case
should be dismissed based on Complainant's written request for
withdrawal, dated September 23, 1994.  
     I agree with the ALJ's ruling to grant Complainant's request
for voluntary dismissal.  Where a complainant in a case arising
under 29 C.F.R. Part 24 (1993) has sought a voluntary dismissal,
Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has been
applied.  See Haymes v. D.P. Associates, Inc., Case
No. 94-SDW-00001, Sec. Ord., Aug. 16, 1994; Hendrix v. Duke
Power Co., Case No. 90-ERA-32, Sec. Ord., Sept. 25, 1990,
citing Nolder v. Raymond Kaiser Engineers, Inc., Case No.
84-ERA-5, Sec. Dec., June 28, 1985, slip op. at 6-8.  Since here,
Respondent did not file the functional equivalent of either an
answer to the 

[PAGE 2] complaint or a motion for summary judgment, Rule 41(a)(1)(i) is the applicable rule. Haymes, supra; Hendrix, supra. Accordingly, this case IS DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(i). [1] SO ORDERED. ROBERT B. REICH Secretary of Labor Washington, D.C. [ENDNOTES] [1] I note that under the regulations implementing the ERA, disposition of complaints, including Rule 41(a)(1)(i) dismissals, can be effected only by final order of the Secretary. 29 C.F.R. § 24.6 (1993); see Brock v. Tennessee Valley Authority, Case No. 90-ERA-19, Sec. Ord., June 28, 1993, slip op. at 2; Avery v. B & W Commercial Nuclear Fuel Plant, Case No. 91-ERA-8, Sec. Ord., Oct. 21, 1991, slip op. at 3; Hendrix, slip op. at 1 n.1.



Phone Numbers