skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 25, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Zinn v. University of Missouri, 93-ERA-34 (Sec'y June 20, 1994)

DATE:  June 20, 1994
CASE NOS. 93-ERA-34
          93-ERA-36 


IN THE MATTER OF

KURT R. ZINN,

          COMPLAINANT,

     v.

UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI,

          RESPONDENT,

     and

STEVEN J. MORRIS,

          COMPLAINANT,

     v.

UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI,

          RESPONDENT.


BEFORE:  THE SECRETARY OF LABOR


                             PRELIMINARY ORDER

     Before me for review is the Recommended Decision and Order
(R.D. and O.) of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in these
consolidated cases arising under the employee protection
provision of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended
(ERA), 42 U.S.C. § 5851 (1992).  The ALJ found that
Respondent's 

[PAGE 2] failure to consider Complainant Zinn for promotion was retaliatory and that Complainant Morris' demotion also was in violation of the ERA. Accordingly, the ALJ recommended ordering that the procedures for establishing a promotion committee for Complainant Zinn should be initiated within 10 days of the Secretary's final order, and that Complainant Morris should be reinstated to his former positions within 10 days of the Secretary's final order. A briefing schedule was issued on June 6, 1994, providing the parties an opportunity to file briefs in support of or in opposition to the ALJ's R.D. and O. The ERA was amended in 1992 to, among other things, require the Secretary to order interim relief as soon as an ALJ issues a recommended decision finding that the complaint has merit. Comprehensive National Energy Policy Act § 2902, Pub. L. No. 102-486, 106 Stat. 2776 (Oct. 24, 1992). Because the complaint in each of these cases was filed after the effective date of the ERA amendments, October 24, 1992, the amendments are applicable in these consolidated cases. Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 5851(b)(2)(A), therefore, I must at this time issue "a preliminary order providing the relief prescribed. . . but may not order compensatory damages pending a final order." Accordingly, I reject the ALJ's recommended order of remedies to the extent that he delayed implementation until up to 10 days after the Secretary's final order, and Respondent is ordered to comply with the remedies as described in the ALJ's R.D. and O. without further delay. SO ORDERED. ROBERT B. REICH Secretary of Labor Washington, D.C.



Phone Numbers