skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 25, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Martin v. Detroit Edison, 94-ERA-4 (ALJ Aug. 18, 1995)


DATE:      August 18, 1995

CASE NO:   94-ERA-00004

In The Matter of

Jimmy Martin
               Complainant

     v.

Detroit Edison
               Respondent


                     RECOMMENDED DECISION AND ORDER

     This matter is before me after numerous delays
occasioned by the parties' joint request to defer scheduling a
hearing.  Finally, on August 11, 1995 a settlement agreement has
been tendered to one for consideration.

     I have reviewed the premises of the agreement and find them
to be reasonable to the parties.  I note that one of the
provisions is entitled "Non-Disclosure".  Its provision only
restricts the Complainant and his wife from certain types of
disclosures.  In view of the limited scope of the provision I see
no public interest that is contravened and that there are no FOIA
implications that would be involved.

     Therefore, I recommend that the Secretary of Labor adopt and
approve of the agreement executed on July 25 and August 7, 1995.

     SO ORDERED.



                                                               
 
                                   Ainsworth H. Brown
                                   Administrative Law Judge

NOTICE:  This Recommended Decision and Order and the
administrative file in this matter will be forwarded for review
by the Secretary of Labor to the Office of Administrative 

[PAGE 2] Appeals, U.S. Department of Labor, Room S-4309, Frances Perkins Building, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210. The Office of Administrative Appeals has the responsibility to advise and assist the Secretary in the preparation and issuance of final decisions in employee protection cases adjudicated under the regulations at 29 C.F.R. Parts 24 and 1978. See 55 Fed. Reg. 13250 (1990).



Phone Numbers