skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 25, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Fullmer v. Arizona Public Service Co., 92-ERA-56 (ALJ Nov. 13, 1992)


U.S. Department of Labor
Office of Administrative, Law Judges
800 K Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C 20001-8002

NOV 13 1992
Case No. 92-ERA-56

ROBERT P. FULLMER
    Complainant,

    v.

ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO., AND
ARIZONA NUCLEAR POWER PROJECT,
    Respondents,

David Colapinto, Esq.
    For the Complainant

Rebecca Winterscheidt
    For the Respondents

Before: AARON SILVERMAN
    Administrative Law Judge

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

WITHOUT PREJUDICE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED

    The Complainant filed1 his Notice of Voluntary Dismissal via fascimile transmission at 1:12 p.m. on Monday, November 2, 1992. Earlier that day, at 7:32 a.m., the Respondent filed its


[Page 2]

answer to the Complainant's complaint.

    The Notice was submitted pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(i) and the order of the Secretary of Labor which govern the procedure for voluntary dismissal of a claim brought under Section 210 of the Energy Reorganization Act, 42 U.S.C. §5851. see e.g. Mosbaugh v. Georgia Power Company, 90-ERA-58 (Sec. Dec. September 23, 1992).

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) provides that a plaintiff has the right to a voluntary dismissal of an action without order of court by way of filing a notice of dismissal prior to an adverse party's filing of an answer or a motion for summary judgment.

    The Complainant contends that at the time of its submission, no answer or motion for summary judgment had been filed. However, the Respondent's answer was received in this Office the morning of November 2, 1992, and, therefore, filed prior to the Notice that afternoon. Thus, the Complainant is not entitled to a dismissal without prejudice in the absence of a court order.

    Voluntary dismissal without prejudice may be granted under Fed. R. Civ. P 41(a)(2) by order of court if the complainant has not had an action based on the same set of facts previously dismissed in another United States or state court.

    Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

    The Complainant:

    1) affirm to this Court that an action based on the facts of this case has not been previously dismissed in any other United States or State court; and

    2) set forth the reason(s) and supporting facts as to why he requests a voluntary dismissal at this time, and why this court should order this matter be voluntarily dismissed without prejudice.

    The Respondent:

    1) show cause why this matter should not be voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. Specifically, Respondent should set


[Page 3]

forth reason(s) and supporting facts to show in what way it will be substantially prejudiced by the entry of dismissal without prejudice; and

    2) show cause whether this matter should be dismissed with prejudice: and

    3) provide the reason why it submitted its answer more than forty-five days (45) days after the complaint was filed with this office.

    The parties are given ten(10) days from the date of this order in which to comply. All other matters or issues will be held in abeyance until this order is complied with

       AARON SILVERMAN
       Administrative Law Judge

[ENDNOTES]

1 A document is deemed filed upon receipt by the Chief Clerk of the Office of Administrative Law Judges. 29 C.F.R. § 518.5(c)(5).



Phone Numbers