September 17, 2008 DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection |
USDOL/OALJ Reporter Pickett v. Tennessee Valley Authority, ARB No. 00-076, ALJ Nos. 1999-CAA-25 and 2000-CAA-9 (ARB Nov. 16, 2000)
ARB CASE NO. 00-076 In the Matter of:
DAVID W. PICKETT,
v.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY (TVA),
BEFORE: THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD Appearances:
For the Complainant:
For the Respondent:
AND VACATE (OR CLARIFY) ORDER AND MOTION TO HOLD HEARING ON MOTION On November 2, 2000, the Administrative Review Board issued an Order striking the Complainant's opening brief and permitting the Complainant to refile a brief consistent with the Board's order postmarked no later than November 16, 2000. Complainant subsequently filed a Motion to Reconsider and Vacate (or Clarify) Order and Motion to Hold Hearing on Motion. [Page 2] The Motion is DENIED. Counsel for Complainant argues that our order violates Complainant's right to free expression. Counsel misapprehends our order, in which we stated,
Although Complainant has not requested additional time in which to resubmit his brief as
provided in our November 2nd Order, we extend the date on which the brief must be postmarked
until November 17, 2000.1
SO ORDERED.
PAUL GREENBERG
E. COOPER BROWN
CYNTHIA L. ATTWOOD
1 This order will be served on
Complainant's counsel by facsimile to the facsimile number listed on documents filed with the Board in this
case.
|
||||||||
|