skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 25, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
USDOL/OALJ Reporter

Erickson v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,, 1999-CAA-2 (ALJ Feb. 14, 2002)


U.S. Department of LaborOffice of Administrative Law Judges
Heritage Plaza Bldg. - Suite 530
111 Veterans Memorial Blvd
Metairie, LA 70005

(504) 589-6201
(504) 589-6268 (FAX)

DOL Seal

Issue date: 14Feb2002

CASE NUMBER: 1999 - CAA - 2
    2001 - CAA - 8
    2001 - CAA - 13
    2002 - CAA - 3

IN THE MATTER OF

SHARYN A. ERICKSON,
    Complainant

       v.

U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION IV, ATLANTA, GEORGIA,
KAROL SMITH & EPA INSPECTOR GENERAL,
    Respondents

ORDER DENYING COMPLAINANT'S MOTIONS FOR RESCHEDULING RESPONSE TO TRIAL & SUMMARY JUDGMENT, TO VACATE DICTA FOR ZEALOUS ADVOCACY, TO RECONSIDER REFUSAL TO DISQUALIFY EPA COUNSEL UNDER LAWYER-WITNESS RULE DUE TO ROLE OF EPA LAWYERS IN SPARKING RETALIATORY CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF COMPLAINANT, AND FOR ADVERSE INFERENCES, PRECLUSION ORDERS AND SANCTIONS AGAINST EPA ATLANTA

    In light of the Amended Pre-Hearing Order, dated February 6, 2002, Complainant's Motions for Rescheduling Response to Trial and Summary Judgment, for Adverse Inferences, Preclusion Order and Sanctions Against EPA Atlanta are DENIED.

   Complainant's Motion to Vacate Dicta for Zealous Advocacy is without merit and is DENIED.

   Complainant's Motion to Reconsider Refusal to Disqualify EPA Counsel Under Lawyer-Witness Rule is DENIED for the reasons stated in the Court's January 24, 2002 Order. Neither Ms. Harris nor Ms. Bell are advocating for the EPA at hearing and I find an insufficient basis to impute disqualification to Ms. Smith and the EPA legal department.

       CLEMENT J. KENNINGTON
       Administrative Law Judge



Phone Numbers