September 24, 2008 DOL Home > OALJ Home > USDOL/OALJ Reporter |
USDOL/OALJ Reporter Thibault v. The Top Shop, 2004-STA-8 (ALJ Jan. 7, 2004)
Issue Date: 07 January 2004 CASE NO.: 2004-STA-00008 In the Matter of
CRAIG R. THIBAULT
v.
THE TOP SHOP
At the hearing on January 5, 2004 in this proceeding which arises under the provisions of section 405 of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act, 49 U.S.C. § 31105 (the .STAA.), the parties entered into the following settlement agreement:
The STAA and its implementing regulations provide that a proceeding under the STAA may be ended prior to entry of a final order by a settlement agreement between the parties. 49 U.S.C. § 31105(b)(2)(C); 29 C.F.R. § 1978.111(d)(2) (2001). The Administrative Law Judge's role in reviewing the parties. settlement agreement is limited to ascertaining whether the terms of the agreement fairly, adequately and reasonably settle the Complainant.s allegations that the Respondent violated the STAA. Ass't Sec'y & Zurenda v. Corporate Express Delivery Systems, Inc., ARB No. 00-041, ALJ No. 1999-STA-30 (ARB March 31, 2000). [Page 2] Pursuant to the requirements of the STAA and implementing regulations, I have carefully reviewed the terms of the parties. settlement agreement, and I have determined that it constitutes a fair, adequate and reasonable settlement of the complaint. Accordingly, the following order is entered:
SO ORDERED.
DANIEL F. SUTTON
Boston, Massachusetts
NOTICE: This Recommended Decision and Order and the administrative file will be forwarded for review to the Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor, Room S-4309, Frances Perkins Building, 200 Constitution Ave., Washington D.C. 20210. 29 C.F.R.
|
||||||||
|