skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 24, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
England v. Tennessee Valley Authority , 91-ERA-22, 53 and 92-ERA-39 (ALJ June 17, 1993)


BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINSTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

Case Nos. 91-ERA-22
91-ERA-53
92-ERA-39

IN THE MATTER OF

MURRELL D. ENGLAND
    Complainant

    v.

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
and EBASCO CONSTRUCTORS, INC.
    Respondents

RECOMMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
    The above case came on to be heard, and it appearing that the parties have agreed that the matters in controversy in this proceeding have been fully conciliated; that the parties have further agreed that this proceeding should be dismissed with full prejudice; and that the conciliation agreement, having been reviewed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 5851(b)(2)(A) (1988), is fair to all parties and consistent with the provisions of law;     It is hereby RECOMMENDED that this proceeding be dismissed with full prejudice.

       RICHARD K. MALAMPHY
       Administrative Law Judge

We agree to the terms of
this Order and hereby request
that it be entered:

Brent R. Marquand
Senior Litigation Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Tennessee Valley Authority
400 West Summit Hill Drive
Knoxville, Tennessee 37902-1499

    Attorney for Respondent
    Tennessee Valley Authority

Donald M. Lasley
8857 Dayton Pike, Suite D
Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee 37379

    Attorney for Complainant
    Murrell D. England

Karen C. Geraghty
EBASCO Constructors, Inc.
Two World Trade Center
New York, New York 10048

    Attorney for Respondent
    EBASCO Constructors, Inc.

2265g



Phone Numbers