September 24, 2008 DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection |
USDOL/OALJ Reporter UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR Case No. 91-ERA-10 IN THE MATTER OF
JIMMIE L. BUCK v.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
During a telephone conference on October 9, 1991, complainant Jimmie L. Buck requested that this proceeding be dismissed. Ms. Buck was advised that the statute of limitations would preclude her from bringing the same claims in the future. Counsel for respondent Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) stated that TVA has no objection to complainant's voluntary dismissal of this proceeding. Since no settlement is involved in this case and both parties have stipulated, as evidenced by the signatures below, that this proceeding should be dismissed, it is hereby recommended that this proceeding be dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii), Fed. R. Civ. P., and 29 C.F.R. § 18.1(a) (1990). See Denayer v. Tennessee Valley Authority, No. 91-ERA-32 (July 22, 1991) (copy attached); Nunn v. Duke Power Co., No. 84-ERA-27 (Sept. 29, 1989); Hooks v. Transportation Servs., Inc., No. 88-STA-7 (June 24, 1988). The hearing scheduled for October 22, 1991, is hereby cancelled. It is so Ordered.
MICHAEL P. LESNIAK
We agree to the terms of Jimmie L. Buck Complainant
Brent R. Marquand Attorney for Respondent Dated: November 5 1991 1806g |
||||||||
|