|
|
|
 |
 |
||||||||||||||
 |
| September 24, 2008 DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection |
|
USDOL/OALJ Reporter Office of Administrative Law Judges 1111 20th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 CASE NO. 90-ERA-24 In the Matter of
G. RICHARD HOWARD, v.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY,
TO COMPEL DISCOVERY By letter dated January 18, 1991, addressed to the Chief Administrative Law Judge, Complainant, pro se, filed copies of interrogatories and requests for production of documents served on Respondent, together with a motion for an order compelling discovery. As Respondent's counsel points out in his letter of February 7, 1991, a recommended order of dismissal was entered in this case on September 4, 1990, and the matter is now before the Secretary of Labor. For this reason, Complainant's motion to compel discovery must be, and is hereby, denied. The materials submitted by both parties will be forwarded to the Secretary of Labor.
NICODEMO DE
GREGORIO
DATED: Feb 21 1991
NDG/bac
|
||||||||
| ||||||||
