skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 24, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Artrip v. Ebasco Services, Inc., 89-ERA-23 (ALJ Mar. 15, 1996)


Date: March 15, 1996

CASE NO.: 89-ERA-23

In the Matter of:

NOAH JERRY ARTRIP,
    Complainant,

    v.

ESICORP, INC., formerly known
as EBASCO SERVICES, INC.,
    Respondent.

ORDER RECOMMENDING THE GRANTING
OF COMPLAINANT'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

    Upon consideration of Complainant's Motion for Reconsideration of Recommended Decision and Order on Damages, any opposition thereto, and the record herein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Recommended Decision and Order on Damages in this matter, dated January 26, 1996, be amended as follows:

    1. The third full paragraph on page 7 of the Recommended Decision and Order shall be amended to read:

Also considered in the back pay calculation is the amount of interim earnings made by Complainant during the back pay period. Interim earnings in replacement employment should be deducted from a back pay award. Blackburn, 86-ERA-4, Sec. Dec., Oct. 30, 1991. The employer, and not the complainant bears the burden of proving a deduction from back pay on account of interim earnings. Hadely v. Southeast Coop. Serv. Co., 86-STA-24, Sec. Dec., June 28, 1991. Here, the only evidence of interim earnings has been presented by the Complainant in the form of Complainant's tax returns. The problem presented is how to calculate which interim earnings were earned during the 10 month period that Complainant would have been working for Texas Utilities. Of Complainant's 1989 adjusted gross income was $18,913.00, $5,009.00 qualifies as interim earnings. This figure does not reflect what amount of work Complainant did during the


[PAGE 2]

time he would have worked for Texas Utilities. Since Complainant would have worked 10 months out of the year, or 83.3% of the year, then Complainant will only have 83.3% of his interim earnings offset against his back pay. The offset interim earnings will be $5,009.00 x .833 = $4,172.00. The total amount of back pay due Complainant is $34,549.00 - $4,172.00 = $30,377.00.

    2. The first paragraph of the ORDER section on page 8 shall be amended to read:

    1. Respondents shall pay to Complainant back pay in the amount of $34,549.00 less interim earnings of $4,172.00 for a total of $30,377.00, plus the appropriate interest at the IRS rate, computed until the date of date of payment to Complainant.

       RICHARD D. MILLS
       Administrative Law Judge

RDM/ea



Phone Numbers