skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 24, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Ruud v. Westinghouse Hanford Co., 88-ERA-33 (ALJ Aug. 3, 1988)


 1                      DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
 2
 3
 4  In the Matter of               )
 5                                 )     CASE NO. 88-ERA-00033
 6  CASEY RUDD,                    )
 7                                 )     ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH
 8                Claimant,        )     PREJUDICE
 9                                 )
10              v.                 )
11                                 )
12   WESTINGHOUSE HANFORD COMPANY, )
13                                 )
14                 Employer.       )
15                                 )
16
17     This matter coming on for hearing and the parties having
18   stipulated to entry of this order and having agreed that all
19   matters pending herein have been fully compromised and
20   settled, now, therefore, it is hereby
21     ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
22     1.   This appeal is dismissed with prejudice and without
23   costs to either party.
24     DATED this, 3rd day of  August, 1988.
25  
26                                    EDWARD C. BURCH
27                                    Administrative Law Judge 
28   LARRY W. McCORMACK
29   Senior Labor Counsel for Westinghouse Hanford Co.
30  
31   JAMES P. HUTTON
32   Velikanje, Moore & Shore, Inc., P.S.
33   Attorneys for claimant  
34   ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 
35   2789tr



Phone Numbers