skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 23, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Ass't Sec'y & Lee v. Western Commercial Transport, 93-STA-40 (Sec'y Jan. 24, 1994)




DATE:  January 24, 1994
CASE NO. 93-STA-40


IN THE MATTER OF

ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF LABOR
FOR OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH,

          PROCESCUTING PARTY,

     and

ROBERT LEE,

     v.

WESTERN COMMERCIAL TRANSPORT,

          RESPONDENT.


BEFORE:   THE SECRETARY OF LABOR


                     FINAL ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT 
                         AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

     This case arises under Section 405 of the Surface
Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (STAA), 49 U.S.C. §
2301 
et seq.  Before me for review is the Administrative
Law Judge's (ALJ's) [Recommended] Decision and Order Approving
Settlement Agreement dated November 3, 1993.
     A hearing had been scheduled on the matter of Complainant's
discriminatory termination complaint for October 13, 1993. 
However, prior to the hearing, the parties submitted a Settlement
Agreement in resolution of their dispute.  The ALJ found the
parties' agreement to be "fair and equitable and in the public 

[PAGE 2] interest"; approved it and incorporated the agreement into his decision and order. Under the regulations which implement the STAA, either an ALJ or the Secretary of Labor may approve a settlelment agreement and dismiss a case. 29 C.F.R. § 1978.111(d)(2) (1992); see Ratliff v. Airco Gases, Case No. 93-STA-00005, Sec. Fin. Order Approving Settlement Agreement, June 25, 1993, slip op. at 1. In this matter however, the [incorporated] Settlement Agreement, at paragraph 3, contains a release, on Complainant's part, aquiting and discharging the Respondent company "from any and all claims, damages and causes of action of any kind whatsoever arising from or in any way related to his employment with WCT or the termination thereof." By this language, the agreement's release clause appears to envision and encompass the settlement of matters arising under various laws other than the STAA. For the reasons set forth in Poulos v. Ambassador Fuel Oil Co., Inc., Case No. 86-CAA-1, Sec. Ord. Nov. 2, 1987, slip op. at 2, I have limited my review of the agreement to determining whether its terms are a fair, adequate and reasonable settlement of Complainant's allegation that Respondent violated the STAA. Upon review of the terms of the agreement, including the release language referenced above, and the record in this case, I find the agreement to be fair, adequate and reasonable. As explained herein, I approve it. Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. SO ORDERED. ______________________________ Secretary of Labor Washington, D.C.



Phone Numbers