skip navigational linksDOL Seal - Link to DOL Home Page
Images of lawyers, judges, courthouse, gavel
September 20, 2008         DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Ass't Sec'y & Swank v. Four Winds Inc., 1998-STA-4 (ARB Jan. 29, 1999)


U.S. Department of Labor
Administrative Review Board
200 Constitution Ave, NW
Washington, DC 20210

ARB CASE NO. 99-029
ALJ CASE NO. 98-STA-4
DATE: January 29, 1999

In the Matter of:

ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND
HEALTH, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
    PROSECUTING PARTY

    and

DOUGLAS SWANK,
    COMPLAINANT,

    v.

FOUR WINDS, INC. d/b/a
PEOPLE'S CHOICE
TRANSPORTATION, INC.,
    RESPONDENT.

BEFORE: THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD

Appearances:

For the Complainant:
    Douglas Swank, pro se

For the Department of Labor:
   Henry L. Solano, Esq., Joseph M. Woodward, Esq., Donald G. Shalhoub,
    Esq., Daniel J. Mick, Esq., Mark J. Lerner, Esq., Peter J. Vassalo, Esq.,
    U.S. Department of Labor, Washington, D.C.

For the Respondent:
    Bradley N. Shefrin, Esq.
    Hayes, Phillips & Maloney, P.C., Denver, Colorado

FINAL ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT
AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

   This case arises under the employee protection provision of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (STAA), as amended, 49 U.S.C. §31105 (1994). The parties submitted a "Stipulation and Settlement Agreement" to the Board seeking approval of the settlement and dismissal of the complaint.


[Page 2]

   Under rules implementing the STAA, a case may be settled at any time after the filing of objections to the Assistant Secretary's findings "if the participating parties agree to a settlement and such settlement is approved by the Administrative Review Board . . . or the ALJ." 29 C.F.R. §1978.111(d)(2). The regulations direct the parties to file a copy of the settlement "with the ALJ or the Administrative Review Board as the case may be." Id. The parties reached a settlement agreement in this case after the ALJ had issued his Recommended Decision and Order and forwarded the case to this Board for consideration. Therefore, the case is before the Board, and we are the appropriate body to review the settlement agreement.

   The request for approval is based on an agreement entered into by the parties. We review it to determine whether the terms are a fair, adequate and reasonable settlement of the complaint. See, e.g., Bettner v. Daymark Foods, Inc., ARB Case No. 98-124, ALJ Case No. 97-STA-73, Final Order Approving Settlement and Dismissing Complaint, Aug. 10, 1998.

   We find that the settlement agreement is a fair, adequate, and reasonable settlement of the complaint. Accordingly, we APPROVE the agreement and DISMISS THE COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE.

   SO ORDERED.

      PAUL GREENBERG
      
Chair

      E. COOPER BROWN
      
Member

      CYNTHIA L. ATTWOOD
      
Acting Member



Phone Numbers